Extra Flashcards
What did eshel argue about sex?
Prevents rapid evolution
breaks apart favorable gene combinations more than it creates them.
PBS model of anisogamy evolution
PBS - Parker Baker Smith model
2 selection pressures on gamete production - no. gametes and fitness of zygote.
Protosperm are caused by a mutation and parasitised the investment of eggs - cheating strategy.
PBS requires zygote fitness must increase disproportionately with volume. and as adult size increases selection for anisogamy increases.
Anisogamy evolved due to sperm limitation - greater egg size gives sperm a greater target, and in sea urchin species, egg size negatively correlates with mean sperm concentration.
What is a gonochore and what does sex allocation theory explain about hermaphrodites?
Gonochore - fixed sex throughout life
Simultaneous hermaphrodites - sex allocation theory predicts optimal allocation an individual should make to m and f function.
- Sequential hermaphrodites - when and why they should change sex.
eg of hermaphrodite fish
Lythrypnus fish - Mature gametes of both sexes in gonad but functions as one sex. anatomically simultaneous hermaphrodites but functionally sequential.
Why may animals choose to change sex?
- Decision to become a primary male might be a response to local social conditions - bluehead wrasse.
- when RV of one sex is greater than the other - Size advantage theory.
- as a response to rapid demographic changes - unknown if in response to change in average size of other fish or directly demographic. eg following disappearance of largest male in harem. no change if the combined RV of all females is lower than the dominant one.
4 bidirectional - eg coral gobies when they find a mate can change sex so the bigger one is female.
which sex changes dominate in polygynous and monogamous systems?
polygynous - female to male
monogamous - male to female.
an experiment which contradicted holland and rice drosophila sexual conflict experiment.
Promislow, Smith and Pearce
sexual selection lines lives longer than monogamous lines. sexual selection leads to overall increased adult viability due to female choice of good genes.
differed in amount of time flies could interact for - Holland and Rice - 5 days, Promislow 3 hours.
2 precopulatory costs of sexual selection to females.
- risk of injury in coercive mating attempts,
2. male exploitation of female sensory preferences may result in females mating suboptimally.
Mechanisms of mate choice coevolution
- fisherian sexy sons
- Zahavi handicap principle
- Direct phenotypic effects - ornament may reflect ability to provide material advantages eg good territory, protection.
- Sensory bias - Originally evolved for other reasons but expoits female bias.
- Genetic compatibility mechanisms - eg MHC - non additive effects from choosing a mate with alleles which complement the genome of the chooser.
Methods of ‘bottom up’ genetic testing.
Identify, sequence and characterise function of a gene locus with several alleles which influence expression of an attractive trait.
DNA microarrays used to detect expression level polymorphism.
What is important in a model system
study in natural environment - to see NS and sexual selection.
conspicous sexual dimporphism strongly correlated to sexual selection.
Microevolutionary tests allowed by short gen time, small body size and known genetics.
what is a prerequisite for sperm competition?
multiple mating by females.
Cryptic female choice is post copulation.
what is the good sperm hypothesis?
M with high fertilisation success have underlying genetic quality, so if successful in sperm competition will sire offspring with high viability.
describe Immunocompetecnce handicap hypothesis
Trade off btw 2nd sexual ornaments and success in sperm competition, with future investment in immune function
indicator mechanism- males who can afford fancy displays must have a high immune function and offspring resistant to disease.
evidence in crickets.
How does Gettys model of optimal investment work?
Absolute costs increase with signal size, marginal costs decrease with increasing signaller quality.
Multiplicative model (Grafens was additive)
Fitness = fecundity x viability
- a good and bad peacock add an eyespot to feather - increased fecundity. however the good peacock has a higher viability so results in higher fitness.
Worse signallers have lower quality conversion of fitness to signal which selects against exaggeration/cheating.