Extinction Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is spontaneous recovery

A

Recovery of responding that occurs when the CS is tested some time after the conclusion of extinction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is renewal?

A

Recovery of responding when subject is tested in context different from where extinction occurred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is reinstatement>

A

Recovery of responding when subject is tested after a non-signalled US presentation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the hypotheses of extinction?

A

Associative loss hypothesis and competing memory hypothesis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does the associative loss hypothesis state?

A

It states that extinction occurs due to unlearning of CS-US association

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does the competing memory hypothesis state?

A

It states that extinction due to learning of CS-No US association, which competes with CS-US association, inhibiting it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was Gerull and Rapee’s study on?

A

It studied modelling in human toddlers, avg ~1.5 years old.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Johanson and Hall’s two experiments?

A

Pup in cup.
First experiment - Contingency learning in newborn pups.
3 groups. Rewarded group: contingency between paddle pushing and milk, Yoked group, and Non-rewarded group. 1 day old pups were able to learn contingency.

Second experiment - Olfactory learning in newborn pups.
2 groups. Rewarded group and yoked group. Rewarded group given milk every time they pushed on lemon-scented paddle, but not on clove-scented paddle.
Rewarded group learned contingency, but yoked group pushed clove-scented paddle more.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Olsson and Phelps’ vicarious learning study

A

Participants who watched another given CS-shock pairing, had EDA and neural activity comparable to those in classical conditioning condition upon testing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Matthews et al. Japanese Quails

A

2 groups of quails, 2 contexts. Equivalent context (CS), equivalent immediate access to sex (US).

Then quails from context B moved to A. Group A were quicker to make cloacal contact with female.

Above chance level 72% that group A males fertilised eggs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Akins Japanese Quails

A

2 groups of quails. 2 contexts, B is unpleasant. 1 group of quail contiguous (US: sex), the other not but still got sex. Paired group shows huge increase in preference for B after 2 trials.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is latent inhibition?

A

The reduction in effectiveness of pairing a CS with an US, as a result of prior exposure to the CS.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is blocking?

A

When one element of a compound CS has already been paired with the US previously causes a disruption in conditioning, leading to a reduction in contingency.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly