Externalities Flashcards

1
Q

Explain how competitive markets maximise profits

A

Competitive markets maximises profits using the marginalist principle and maximise profits where marginal revenue is equals to marginal cost of production.

Marginal revenue refers to the additional revenue that a firm makes from selling one more unit of output produced and marginal cost is the additional cost that a firm incurs from increasing output produced by one unit.

When MR > MC, the additional revenue to be obtained from selling an additional unit of output produced is greater than the additional cost of that output produced. There is still higher profit to be gained by increasing output.

When MR < MC, the additional revenue to be obtained from selling an additional unit of output produced is less than the additional cost it would incur. The firm will cut back on its output to increase profits.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Externalities

A

In their pursuit of self-interest, consumers and producers will only consider their own private costs and benefits.

Hence, these private-decision makers will not take into account any external costs or benefits on third parties.

This results in externalities when some of the costs or benefits associated with the production or consumption of a good spill over onto third parties, without directly affecting the market price, creating a divergence between private and social costs and benefits.

Externalities can be positive (underproduction/underconsumption) or negative (excessive production or consumption)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain negative externalities from consumption (e.g. market for alcohol)

A

The market for alcohol fails due to negative externality in consumption which occurs when external costs are imposed on third-parties from the consumption of a good or service by private individuals.

In pursuit of self-interest, consumers only consider their MPB when making consumption decisions, such as their utility from consuming alcohol which results in them feeling high and relieving of stress. However, they do not consider the external costs to third parties such as the possibility of drunk driving which could result in higher medical expenses for third parties. As such, there is a divergence between MPB and MSB with a difference MEC.

Assuming there are no externalities in production, MPC = MSC, the free market equilibrium occurs at Q0 where MPB=MPC, but the socially optimal output level is Q1 where MSB=MSC (4).

As such there is the overconsumption of Q0Q1 units, and a deadweight loss of area ABC as the additional costs in PRODUCING Q0Q1 units > additional benefits in CONSUMING Q0Q1 units (5). As such there is over-allocation of resources in the market for alcohol resulting in allocative inefficiency and hence market failure.

  • MEB <0, MSB < MPB, Over-consumption
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain negative externalities from production (e.g. petrol chemicals)

A

Negative externalities from production occur when external costs are imposed on third-parties from the production of a good or service by private firms. The market for petrol chemicals fails due to negative externalities from production. - In their pursuit of self-interest, private firms would only consider their own private costs such as the cost of electricity and manpower and private benefits such as the free market price they receive for the sale of their product. They ignore the external costs imposed on third parties such as fishermen who rely on nearby waters to fish and earn a living. They may have a loss in income due to lower quality and quantity of catch. These external costs result in a divergence between MPC and MSC of producing petrol-chemicals where MSC is higher than MPC.

Assuming there is no externality from the consumption of petrol chemicals and MPB = MSB, free market equilibrium output occurs where MPC = MPB but the socially optimal output level is Q1 where MSB=MSC. There is an overallocation of resources and deadweight loss of area XXX as the additional costs in producing Q0Q1 units > additional benefits in consuming Q0Q1 units. Societal welfare would increase if fewer units of the good are produced. Thus, the current level of output is allocatively inefficient and results in market failure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain positive externality from consumption (e.g. Flu Vaccine)

A

Positive externality from consumption occurs when an individual consumption confers benefits to third parties who are not directly involved but the individual is not compensated.

In the pursuit of self-interest, individuals only consider their MPB of taking the flu vaccine such as their increased immunity and lower likelihood of missing school or work due to falling ill. However, they do not consider the external benefits conferred onto third parties. These benefits include contributing to herd immunity which is achieved when a sufficient proportion of the population is vaccinated against the disease, creating a protective effect for those who have medical conditions preventing them from getting vaccinated, lower healthcare costs and increased social stability for the society as a whole. As such, there is a divergence between MPB and MSB with a difference MEC. Assuming there are no externalities in production, MPC = MSC, the free market equilibrium occurs at Q0 where MPB = MPC but the socially optimal output occurs at MSB = MSC, there is an overconsumption of QOQ1 units and deadweight loss of area ABC as the additional benefits from consuming Q0Q1 units outweighs the costs of producing Q0Q1 units, resulting in market failure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain positive externality from production (e.g. Vaccines, Organic farming, Beehives of honey producers and pollination, agricultural output)

A

When a firm’s production increases the well-being of others but the firm is not compensated by those others, resulting in an underproduction of the good.

MPC: Cost of R&D, advertisement

Requires gov intervention in the form of subsidies to incentivise private firms and parmaceutical companies to produce. Increased competition also leads to better quality vaccines. The benefits tend to outweigh the costs including distortion from taxes required to raise revenue to finance the subsidy.

Alternative solutions include positive reinforcement (nudge theory in behavioural economics), fines are highly distortionary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Marginal private cost (MPC)

A

Direct cost incurred by producers of producing an additional unit of a good

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Marginal external cost (MEC)

A

Any additional costs associated with the production of the good that are imposed on others but that producers do not pay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Marginal social cost (MSC)

A

MPC + MEC

Social cost to society which includes the private marginal cost to producers plus marginal external cost in the production or consumption of the good or service.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Marginal private benefit (MPB)

A

The direct benefit to consumers of consuming an additional unit of good or service or producers from producing a good or service

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Marginal Social Benefit (MSB)

A

Social benefits are the total gains in welfare by the whole society and consists of the private and external benefits from the production or consumption of the good or service.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain the externality graph

A

Increasing MPC: Firms are using more resources so they become less efficient.

MEC = consequence imposed on society, not the producers

MSC compromises all costs societies face (MEC + MPC)

In a perfectly competitive market, firms are price takers and set price at a fixed level
where P= MR= MC as companies are rational and want to maximise profit.
At A, firms maximise profits. However, there is overproduction, leading to excessive pollution, resulting in negative externality. Firms disregard negative impacts on society, on fishermen, so we end up in A. However, the pareto efficient and socially optimal quantity would be B where price = MSC.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Private solutions to externalities

A

1) Internalise externalities
2) Coase theorem
3) Legal system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain how internalising externalities work

A

Involves forming economic units of sufficient size so that most of the consequences of any action occur within the unit (E.g. Households can collectively decide to undertake maintenance of the facilities that affect them all by forming an apartment association.)

However, there is a problem of free-riders ⇒ Must be some way of enforcing the collective agreement such as through a legal system which ensures that the terms of the agreement (how to deal with externalities imposed on each other, to provide ‘public goods’ are adhered to).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain the coase theorem

A

Refer to lecture notes and graph! Need to explain

The coase theorem states that when one party is engaged in an activity that imposes costs on a third party in the form of externalities, a negotiated settlement between the two parties may result in a Pareto-efficient allocation of resources in which the externality is internalised.

The Pareto efficient outcome is attained as long as private bargaining exhausts all potential mutual gains, and this is regardless of which party owns the property rights because externalities arise when individuals do not bear the full consequences of their actions.

The assumption behind the coase theorem is that there are well-defined property rights and costless bargaining, negotiations between the party creating the externality and the party affected.

1) Property rights: Externalities can be dealt with by the proper assignment of property rights to an individual, the right to control some assets and to receive fees for the property’s use.

2) Unitisation of production: Determination of who compensates whom makes a difference to the distributive implications of the externality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Limitations of the coase model

A

Although private bargaining does not require gov intervention, it requires a legal framework for enforcing contracts to ensure that parties abide by the bargains. There are also other problems that arise with Coasean bargaining.

1) Property rights not clearly defined especially when there are many parties on both sides of the externality (who to assign and how to compensate), holdout problem

2) Transaction costs – bargaining processes to find actual costs and benefits to each party might be too high for it to occur, hiring lawyers, there is also incentive for the harmed party to overstate negative consequences for a better deal

3) Collective action problems – difficult to find an agreement and to bring together firms under 1 corporation

4) Imperfect information – government lacks clarity to impose a fair and efficient solution as the cost imposed on each party must be measured, not just the aggregate cost. There is also a need to establish the exact origin or the pollutant to decide how much each party should receive.

5) Limited funds - party who compensates may not have enough to pay the other party to reduce output to the optimal level

6) Legal enforcement

17
Q

Polluter pays principle?

A

Suggests that the polluter should bear the cost of pollution through measures such as:

1) Taxation: The tax equal to MEC causes the after-tax price received by plantations to be lower and it now faces the full MSC and produces less.

2) Compensation: Gov can require plantations to compensate for costs imposed on fishermen and will maximise profit where P = MSC. This makes fishermen better off, improving distributive effects.

These will result in plantations having to pay the minimum acceptable offer (at least as much as the cost incurred by the fishing industry)

Depends on feasibility, cost of implementation and other normative concepts like fairness:

a) Increase in COP of the producers may be passed onto consumers, calling in the issue of fairness with regard to poorer consumers

b) Implementing a subsidy for the use of alternative technologies OR tax on the sale/use of pesticides incentivises pollutes to reduce pollution, increasing their profits. This might be more cost-effective compared to administrative and enforcement costs associated with making each individual internalise their external costs through fines etc. Profits and pollution costs will fall but both will be better off compared to if only plantations were taxed.

18
Q

Explain how the legal system aims to tackle externalities

A

The legal system can provide protections against externalities even if the property rights are not well defined. Legislation and regulation recognises the importance of existence values and the government, acting as the trustee for the country’s natural resources has the right to sue for damages.

Ex) Exxon tanker valdez oil spill in 1989 had an externality effect on fishermen whose catch was diminished, those in the tourist industry and residents nearby who enjoyed the pristine environment. Courts recognised these existence values and Exxon had to pay 1 billion dollars compensation

19
Q

Why might private solutions to tackle externalities fail?

A

1) Public goods problem (free-riders)
2) Imperfect information
- In any bargaining situation, one party may risk the possibility of not arriving at a mutually advantageous agreement because;
- How much to compensate for the externality is unclear and;
- There is an incentive not to reveal the truth

3) Problem of unitisation:
- Bringing everything under a single unitised management and control
- Ex) Oil pool – if all but one landowners chooses not to unitise, the last owner will only join if they receive more than a proportionate share of the revenues since production on the unitised portion will be reduced, all small owers would hold out to join the unitisation agreement
- Thus, states find it necessary to pass legislation requiring unitisation.

4) Transaction costs:
- Cost of getting individuals together to internalise externalities are significant as the provision of such services constitutes a public good
- Dealing with externalities through judicial processes are problematic when the losses generated by the externalities are smaller than what it takes to justify litigation. As a result, those generating externalities are inclined to generate externalities to the point where costs to litigate is higher than the losses from externalities, leading to great inefficiencies.
- Uncertainty of lawsuit outcomes and the high costs further deters the use of judicial processes
- High costs also imply differential access to legal remedies as the poor are unable to bear the risks of litigation

20
Q

Public solutions to externalities

A

Market-based solutions
1) Fines and taxes
2) Subsidies
3) Marketable Permits

Direct Regulation
4) Regulation

21
Q

Coasian VS. Pigouvian approaches

A

Pigouvian analysis holds producers of negative externalities responsible

Coasian analysis shows this assumption is untenable:
(e.g. if you prevent me from smoking you are imposing an externality on me) – the concept of externality cannot be used on its own to decide who should pay for the externality

Coase restricts scope of application of the concept:
If costs (transaction costs or production costs) are higher than the benefits of internalising the externality then externality will not be fixed.

How do we reduce transaction costs? This requires a comparative institutional analysis of what is best - states vs market in reducing transaction costs

22
Q

Explain how taxes solve the problem of externalities

A

Corrective/Pigouvian taxes are designed to make MPC = MSC by using a tax that is equal to the MEC (e.g. marginal cost of pollution) to incentivise the firm to undertake the efficient level of output because by reducing quantity of output, MSC goes down and they can therefore pay less taxes.

Without taxes, firms produce at P = MPC where there is excessive production. By setting a tax equal to MEC, efficiency can be obtained at Qe. The area = amount of tax can be obtained by the output*MEC.

Taxes can incentivise firms to:
1) Reduce pollution by producing less
2) Change production methods

23
Q

Evalute the use of taxes

A

1) Information problem - how much should we tax?
- Overtaxation creates a problem instead of fixing it
Monitoring and enforcement costs

2) Taxing inputs reduces incentives to reduce pollution in the future

3) Blunt instrument, may need exceptions
4) Political feasibility, “tax hurts ____sector”

5) Distributive consequences
- May have to lay off some workers to pay off the tax – those workers would be unemployed and disadvantaged (consequence on the most vulnerable population)
- How about consequences on consumers who now have to pay more to afford the good due to price?

24
Q

Explain how subsidies aim to tackle externalities

A

Since firms do not receive the direct benefit from pollution abatement, there is little incentive for them to spend.

(Refer to graph!)
Before the subsidy is implemented. firms produce at P = MPC (Qm) which is greater than Qe (P = MSC before subsidy), generating an externality and inefficiency.

After subsidies, firms invest in greener technology, causing MEC to shrink and MSC to be lowered, increasing the socially optimal quantity to Qo where P = MSC (after subsidy). Thus, we are able to reach optimal pollution level but not the optimal quantity level because as a result of the subsidy, MPC also decreases and we produce at Qs where P = MPC (after subsidy).

Even though firms are producing cleaner, Qs still exceeds Qo. Although externality for each unit of good has decreased, too many resources are allocated, resulting in inefficiency.

However, it overall reduces the MSC of production due to lowered pollution. By reducing the firm’s MPC, the firm’s output also increases. Reducing pollution also reduces the magnitude of excess production which ultimately minimises distortion.

25
Q

Evaluate the use of taxes and subsidies

A

Polluters prefer subsidy over fines due to higher profits

Distributional consequences
1) Tax: Distributional consequences are not limited to the polluting firms, because output will be smaller under tax, so prices would be higher, and consumers would be worse off.

2) Subsidy: Taxpayers finances subsidy are better off under tax system.

Doesn’t generate distributive consequences like tax but there may be distributive consequences between countries as subsidies negatively affect the competitiveness of firms in other countries which do not have gov support with subsidies

However, the decision for policy is not based on distributional concern, but rather efficiency. Under subsidy, it is less efficient as polluting producers don’t face the true social costs, but in tax systems they do.

Opp cost: Subsidy financed through tax takes money from other gov investments

26
Q

Explain how marketable permits aim to tackle externalities

A

Situation in which you grant companies permits through cap and trade
More efficient firms can sell their permits to other companies, incentivising firms to innovate

27
Q

Problems with marketable permits

A

Refer to notes

28
Q

Explain how direct regulation aims to tackle externalities

A

1) Performance-based regulations

2) Input regulations

Standards (e.g. meta regulation involves assessing criteria for criteria)
Information problem
Costly monitoring and enforcement
Regulatory capture