External Factors Affecting Class Flashcards
Barry Sugarman (1970)
Working Class Subculture (contains 4 key features which act as a barrier to educational achievement):
- fatalism
- collectivism
- immediate gratification
- present-time orientation
These beliefs are internalised through the socialisation process, leading to underachievement.
Hubbs-Tait et al (2002)
When parents use language to challenge children to evaluate their own understanding or abilities, cognitive performance improves.
Feinstein (2008), found that MC parents are more likely to use language in this way.
Basil Bernstein (1975)
Speech Codes:
- Restricted code (used by the WC), features limited vocabulary and is based on short, grammatically simple and in analytical sentences.
- Elaborated code (used by the MC and schools), features a wider vocabulary and longer, grammatically complex and analytical sentences.
Douglas (1964)
Parents Education:
- WC parents place less value on education/ less encouraging/less ambitious for their children.
- WC visited schools less often and were less likely to discuss their child’s progress with teachers
Feinstein (2008)
Argued that parents’ own education is the lost important factor in affecting children’s achievement.
- Educated parents’ parenting style emphasises consistent discipline and high standards, compared to WC who’s is harsh and inconsistent.
- Educated parents are more likely to read educational books/ poems/ songs to their children/ help them with HW/ visit libraries and museums.
Bernstein + Young (1967)
Educated parents tend to have higher incomes and spend it on educational materials.
- MC mothers are more likely to buy educational toys and books which encourage reasoning skills and stimulate intellectual development.
Counter (cultural deprivation) Feinstein
Regardless of class or income, parental education has an effect on a child’s education in its own right; children who’s parents are better educated tend to do better at school.
This may explain why not all children of WC parents do equally badly, and not all children from MC families are equally successful.
Compensatory Education
Programmes which aim to tackle cultural deprivation by providing extra resources to communities in deprived areas through intervening in a child’s primary socialisation process.
E.g: “Operation Head Start: A US scheme to help underprivileged pre-schoolers in the 1960’s which included improving parenting skills, nursery classes and home visits from educational psychologists.
One example is “Sesame Street.”
Counter (cultural deprivation) Nell Keddie (1973)
Cultural deprivation is a myth and a victim blaming explanation.
She dismisses the idea of cultural deprivation arguing that WC children are culturally different, not deprived.
- WC pupils fail due to being disadvantaged because d an education system based on MC values.
Counter (Cultural Deprivation) : Troyna + Williams (1986)
Argue that the language of WC pupils is not the problem, but the schools attitude towards it.
They argue that teachers have a “speech hierarchy” with MC at the top, followed by WC and finally “black speech.”
Counter (cultural deprivation) Blackstone + Mortimore (1994)
Argues that WC parents attend fewer parents evenings not because of a lack of interest, but because they are put off by the schools MC atmosphere.
-WC parents may wish to help with their child’s progress but lack the education and knowledge to do so.
Housing
WC are more likely to live in poverty-stricken areas.
- Cramped conditions; less space to study without distractions.
- Sharing of rooms; disrupted sleep and poor concentration.
- Damp conditions; sickness and absences from school.
Marilyn Howard (2001)
Diet & Health
- WC pupils have lower intakes of energy and weaker immune systems.
- WC pupils are have poorer nutritions/ vitamins and minerals.
Support: Diet and Health: Wilkinson (1996)
- Found that among 10 year olds, the lower the social class, the higher the rate of hyper-activity, anxiety and behavioural disorders.
Financial Support and The Costs of Education: (Emily Tanner et al(2003)
- The costs of items such as transport, uniforms, textbooks, computers etc. place a heavy burden on WC families.
- WC children may have to make do with “hand-me-downs” and cheaper, unfashionable equipment, leading to stigmatisation/bullying from peers.