Express Trusts - Three Certainties Flashcards
Three Certainties
Intention, Subject matter, Objects
Three Certainties case
Chambers v Fahey 1931
Whether, in substance, sufficient intention to create a trust has been manifested
Re Kayford 1975
Precatory words/ moral obligation - insufficient
Re Adams & the Kengsington Vestry 1884
Imperative Words - sufficient
Paul v Constance 1977
Sham Trusts
Midland Bank v Wyatt 1995
What is required is common intention, but reckless indifference will be taken to constitute necessary intention
A v A 2007
If there is no intention to create a trust….
Absolute Gift
Subject Matter must be ….
Clearly identifiable
Chattel
Rowe v Prance 1999
Chose in Action
Paul v Constance 1977
s
Trust for property and to receive a ‘reasonable income’ sufficiently defined
Re Golays WT 1965
Wife to inherit ‘all other houses’ after daughter chose one
Boyce v Boyce 1849 not sufficiently defined
Unregulated goods
Re London Wine Corp 1986
Re Goldcorp Exchange Ltd 1995
Re Goldcorp Exchange Ltd 1995
‘it makes no difference what the parties intended, if what the intended is impossible’
Re Goldcorp Exchange Ltd 1995 judge
Lord Musthill
Land
Proprietors of Wakatu v AG 2017
Intangible Assets
Hunter v Moss 1993 (shares)
‘real property, intellectual property rights or bank debts’
Wilkinson v North 2018
Objects must be
Identified or identifable
Trustee must be able to administer the trust
IRC v Broadway Cottages 1955
Fixed Trust
‘ascertained or ascertainable beneficiaries’ Re Endacott 1960 - List Certainty
Mere powers
Do not have to ascertain every member of the class Re Gulbenkian’s Settlements 1970