Express Trusts - Three Certainties Flashcards

1
Q

Three Certainties

A

Intention, Subject matter, Objects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Three Certainties case

A

Chambers v Fahey 1931

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Whether, in substance, sufficient intention to create a trust has been manifested

A

Re Kayford 1975

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Precatory words/ moral obligation - insufficient

A

Re Adams & the Kengsington Vestry 1884

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Imperative Words - sufficient

A

Paul v Constance 1977

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sham Trusts

A

Midland Bank v Wyatt 1995

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is required is common intention, but reckless indifference will be taken to constitute necessary intention

A

A v A 2007

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

If there is no intention to create a trust….

A

Absolute Gift

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Subject Matter must be ….

A

Clearly identifiable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Chattel

A

Rowe v Prance 1999

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Chose in Action

A

Paul v Constance 1977

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

s

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Trust for property and to receive a ‘reasonable income’ sufficiently defined

A

Re Golays WT 1965

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Wife to inherit ‘all other houses’ after daughter chose one

A

Boyce v Boyce 1849 not sufficiently defined

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Unregulated goods

A

Re London Wine Corp 1986
Re Goldcorp Exchange Ltd 1995

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Re Goldcorp Exchange Ltd 1995

A

‘it makes no difference what the parties intended, if what the intended is impossible’

17
Q

Re Goldcorp Exchange Ltd 1995 judge

A

Lord Musthill

18
Q

Land

A

Proprietors of Wakatu v AG 2017

19
Q

Intangible Assets

A

Hunter v Moss 1993 (shares)

20
Q

‘real property, intellectual property rights or bank debts’

A

Wilkinson v North 2018

21
Q

Objects must be

A

Identified or identifable

22
Q

Trustee must be able to administer the trust

A

IRC v Broadway Cottages 1955

23
Q

Fixed Trust

A

‘ascertained or ascertainable beneficiaries’ Re Endacott 1960 - List Certainty

24
Q

Mere powers

A

Do not have to ascertain every member of the class Re Gulbenkian’s Settlements 1970

25
Discretionary Trusts Irish Test
List Certainty
26
Discretionary Trusts Irish Test case
IRC v Broadway Cottages 1955
27
Discretionary Trusts UK Test
individual ascertainability test - If it can be said with certainty that any given individual is or is not a member of the class
28
Discretionary Trusts UK Test case
McPhail v Doulton 1971
29
List Certainty affirmed
Re Parker 1966 & O'Byrne v Davoren 1994
30
trust relied on trustees opinion of whether wife had ceased living in the property
Re Coxen - valid
31
trust relied on trustees opinion of social relationships
Re Jones - invalid
32
trust relied on trustees opinion of who had a moral claim
Re Leek - invalid
33
trust relied on Rabbis opinion of if someone was an approved wife under Jewish standards
Re Tuck - valid
34
Unworkability
R v District Auditor ex parte West Yorkshire Re Harding 2008
35
Capriciousness
Brown v Burdett 1882