Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

equity > express trusts > Flashcards

express trusts Flashcards

1
Q

trustee has what title

A

legal title

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

beneficiary has what title

A

equitable title

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the 3 ways in which a settlor can constitute a trust

A

1) A makes outright gift of property to B
2) A declares him/herslef trustee of the property, to hold on trust for B, or
3) A transfers the property to C as a trustee, to hold on trust for B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what does Milroy v Lord say about when equity will not construe a valid trust

A

equity will not construe a valid trust from a failed gift

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what formality is required for an express trust (2)

A

-signed writing is required to create express trusts over land, or transfer pre-existing equitable interests in any type of property. Otherwise no formalities are required
(Law of Property Act 1925, s53)

-a formally executed deed of trust in common- but not a requirement. Oral declaration will do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what 2 cases show the problem of oral declarations of trusts

A
  • Paul v Constance

- Gold v Hill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

where settlor and trustee are the same, what must there be

A

where the settlor and trustee are the same, there must be a declaration of trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

3 cases which show declaration of trust (where settlor and trustee are the same)

A
  • Jones v Lock
  • Paul v Constance
  • Richards v Delbridge
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

where settlor and trustee are different, what must there be in place

A

there must be a transfer of property to the trustee (application of the law of gifts)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

case for where settlor and trustee are different

A

T Choithram

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

case which shows that a transfer is required (where settlor and trustee are different)

A

Milroy v Lord

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

case where the purported trust property made its way to the trustee by operation of a will

A

Re Ralli’s WT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

will trust case

A

Strong v Bird

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

3 certainties first seen in which case

A

Knight v Knight

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

which case shows that the courts will seek to resolve ambiguity in favour of validity

A

Re Hay’s ST

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what are the 3 certainties

A
  • certainty of intention
  • certainty of subject matter
  • certainty of objects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

certainty of intention

what does it concern

A

the settlor’s intention, expressed through the acts and words of the settlor as interpreted objectively

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

certainty of intention

3 cases

A
  • Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society
  • Re Sigma Finance Corpn
  • Staden v Jones
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

certainty of intention

what must there be intention for

A

an intention to create a trust not a gift ie. hold the property for the benefit of others. However, it is not necessary to use the word ‘trust’ or ‘confidence’

-we are looking for the substance of the words in order to determine what the settlor intends

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

certainty of intention

2 cases showing that there must be an intention to create a trust not a gift

A
  • Re Kayford Ltd

- Re Farepak Food and Gifts Ltd

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

certainty of intention

meaning on the word ‘trust’

A

neither does the the use of the word ‘trust’ necessarily mean a trust if that is not what it meant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

certainty of intention

case on the word ‘trust’

A

Tito v Waddell (No 2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

certainty of intention

what words must be used to express intention

A

imperative words or precatory words, expressing ‘hopes, desires, requests, wishes’ but as a whole court said words must be imperative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

certainty of intention

4 cases for imperative words

A
  • Lambe v Eames (‘in any way she may think best’)
  • Re Adams and Kensington Vestry (in full confidence that she will do what is write’)
  • Re Diggles (‘it is my desire’)
  • Re Johnson (‘I request’)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

certainty of intention

2 cases where valid trusts were created using (imperative words)

A
  • Comiskey v Bowring Hanbury (complex and included some precatory words, but as a whole was imperative
  • Re Steel’s WT (precatory words, but copied from an 1868 precedent pre-dating Lambe v Eaves)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

certainty of intention

when will there be no certainty of intention

A

there is no certainty of intention to create a trust if it is a sham or fraud

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

certainty of intention

2 cases where there was no certainty of intention because it was either a sham or fraud

A
  • Hitch v Stone

- Midland Bank v Wyatt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

certainty of intention

when will there be no intention to create a trust (settlor)

A

if the trust is so massively discretionary that the settlor effectively retains control, that is not an intention to create a trust (or not a trust)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

certainty of intention

1 case and 1 article where there is no intention to create a trust by the settlor, if the trust is so discretionary

A
  • JSC case

- Lionel Smith ‘Massively discretionary trusts’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

certainty of subject matter

the definition

A

property needs to be specified in objectively certain terms. T needs to know what to manage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

certainty of subject matter

case

A

Brudenell-Bruce v Moore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

certainty of subject matter

3 cases which failed to identify the beneficiaries’ individual shares in the subject matter

A
  • Burrough v Philcox (solved by dividing equally)
  • Boyce v Boyce (whole gift failed because condition failed)
  • Re Knapton (court intervened to save gift- a more modern approach?)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

certainty of subject matter

what are the 2 issues when it comes to shares

A
  • failing to identify the beneficiaries’ individual shares in the subject matter
  • allocating shares of property in bulk. Which elements in the bulk belong to whom?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

certainty of subject matter

4 cases about the problem of allocating shares of property in bulk

A
  • Re London Wine Shippers (choses in possession)
  • Hunter v Moss (choses in action)
  • Re Harvard Securities (approving Hunter v Moss)
  • White v Shortall
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

certainty of subject matter

which act does not apply to trusts

A

Sale of Goods Act 1979, s 20A (as inserted by the Sale of Goods (Amendment Act) 1995)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

certainty of subject matter

which 2 academics wrote about certainty of subject matter

A
  • Hayton ‘uncertainty of subject matter of trusts’

- Martin ‘certainty of subject matter: a defence of Hunter v Moss’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

certainty of objects (beneficiaries)

what does object mean

A

‘object’ means the object of the bounty, ie the beneficiary - plainly the trustee needs to know who she is holding the property for.

  • But often the objects are defined as a class rather than a list of individuals
  • moreover, the trustee may have different degrees of discretion as to who gets what
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

certainty of objects (beneficiaries)

what are the 4 matters- as defined by Emery

A

1) conceptual (or linguistic) certainty
2) evidential certainty
3) ascertainability
4) administrative workability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

certainty of objects (beneficiaries)

1) conceptual (or linguistic) certainty- meaning

A

the precision of language used by the settlor to define the classes of person whom he intends to benefit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

certainty of objects (beneficiaries)

2) evidential certainty meaning

A

evidence available enabling specific persons to be identified as members of those classes- and so as beneficiaries or potential beneficiaries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

certainty of objects (beneficiaries)

3) ascertainability - meaning

A

the extent to which ‘the whereabouts or continued existence’ of persons identified as beneficiaries or potential beneficiaries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

certainty of objects (beneficiaries)

4) administrative workability- meaning

A

the extent to which it is practicable for trustees to discharge the duties laid upon them by the settlor towards beneficiaries or potential beneficiaries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

fixed trust

what does the trustee not have

A

no discretion in carrying out the trust’s instructions. Complete conceptual and evidential certainty is therefore required since every beneficiary and non-beneficiary needs to be positively identified

44
Q

fixed trusts

a list of what is required

A

a complete list of beneficiaries is required

45
Q

fixed trusts

2 cases about complete list of beneficiaries being required

A
  • IRC v Broadway Cottages

- OT Computers Ltd v First National Tricity Finance Ltd

46
Q

fixed trusts

what words are certain and what words are not

A

terms such as ‘siblings’ or ‘employees’ are conceptually/ linguistically certain, but ‘friends’ and ‘relatives are problematic

47
Q

fixed trusts

case about certainty of the words

A

Re Gulbenkian

48
Q

fixed trusts

what would suffice if present

A

if there is just a substantial probability of evidential certainty

49
Q

fixed trusts

case about substantial probability of evidential certainty

A

Re Saxone Shoe Co Ltd’s Trust Deed

50
Q

fixed trusts

if one or more beneficiaries are missing, what 2 things may a trustee do

A
  • Trustees may follow the process in the Trustee Act 1925, s27 (advertise and wait)
  • and obtain a ‘Benjamin order’ permitting distribution to the other beneficiaries in what would otherwise be a breach of trust
51
Q

fixed trusts

case for obtaining a Benjamin order

A

Re Benjamin

52
Q

fixed trusts

what should be taken out to avoid difficulties where beneficiaries are missing

A

missing beneficiary insurance

53
Q

discretionary trusts

what is this

A

the trustee must appoint the entirety of the appropriate property to the objects, she has the discretion, within the directions, to choose how much and to whom.

-The exercise of this trust power is mandatory- which is how one identifies a discretionary trust from the trust’s terms

54
Q

discretionary trusts

originally what was required

A

a complete list

55
Q

discretionary trusts

2 cases which show that originally a complete list was required

A
  • IRC v Broadway Cottages

- Burrough v Philcox

56
Q

discretionary trusts

a complete list may be workable with .. and may not be workable for …

A

it may be workable with a small class of beneficiaries, but with a large class enumerating every member might be possible to at least unworkable

57
Q

discretionary trusts

the House of Lords adopted the test from what to what

A

the House of Lords adopted the test from fiduciary powers to discretionary trusts. It is only required that one can ascertain that an individual postulant is a member of the class or not; the ‘individual ascertainability’ or ‘in or out test’

58
Q

discretionary trusts

case for individual ascertainability or in our out test

A

McPhail v Doulton, Re Baden’s Deed Trusts (No1)

59
Q

discretionary trusts

in Re Baden’s Deed Trusts (No2), what was there a dispute about

A

there was a dispute as to how this test should be applied. In the second round of litigation, (Re Baden’s Deed Trusts (No2)) all three lords justices differed as to its interpretation

60
Q

discretionary trusts

what do you need in order to apply this test as seen in Re Baden

A

one still needs records in order to apply this test; the trust inherently fails if the records do not allow one to ask if that given postulant is in the class or not

61
Q

discretionary trusts

case for needing records to apply the test

A

Re Sayer

62
Q

discretionary trusts

how may it be possible to cure any uncertainty

A

by specifying an umpire

63
Q

discretionary trusts

specifying an umpire cases

A
  • Re Wynn (wide clause could not be cured by allowing trustee to decide)
  • Re Coxen (conditional gift depending on ‘if in the opinion of my trustees she shall have ceased permanently to reside’ in a house not void for uncertainty)
  • Re Tuck’s ST (so long as he be of the Jewish faith and living with ‘an approved wife’, not void as could be determined by the appropriate rabbi)
64
Q

fiduciary powers

how do they differ from discretionary trusts

A

the power does not have to be exercised, though the trustee must consider doing so. Thus they are very close to discretionary trusts.

65
Q

fiduciary powers

how to spot them apart from discretionary trusts

A

the way to spot them is to look for an alternative destination for the property ie. if there is the possibility go a ‘gift over’

66
Q

fiduciary powers

2 cases which show how to spot them from a discretionary trust

A

Re Gulbenkian’s Settlements

Re Gestetner’s Settlement

67
Q

a series of gifts subject to a condition precedent

how does this category have the most lenient test

A

it is only required that one can say with certainty that some person would clearly be a member of the class

68
Q

a series of gifts subject to a condition precedent

2 cases

A

Re Allen

Re Barlow

69
Q

duty to survey the field

what must the trustee do

A

the trustee must inform the beneficiaries of their rights

70
Q

duty to survey the field

case to show that the trustee must inform the beneficiaries of their rights

A

Hawkesley v May

71
Q

duty to survey the field

when is there a duty to survey the field

A

when applying discretion; the trustee must make a rational decision.

  • this varies with the type of trust.
  • this is not relevant to fixed trusts except in the most trivial sense
72
Q

duty to survey the field

in Re Baden (No1) what suggestion was given as to how the test may be framed

A

‘[The trustee] would examine the field, by class and category;
-might indeed make diligent and
careful inquiries, depending on how much money he had to give away and the means at his
disposal, as to the composition and needs of particular categories and of individuals within
them;
-decide upon certain priorities or proportions, and then select individuals according to
their needs or qualifications.

73
Q

duty to survey the field

in Re Baden (No2) what suggestion was given as to how the test may be framed (2)

A

Stamp LJ: A ‘comprehensive range of inquiry is called for.’

Sachs LJ: ‘Assessing in a businesslike way “the size of the problem”’ is what the trustees are
called on to do.

74
Q

duty to survey the field

in Re Hay’s ST what suggestion was given as to how the test may be framed

A

[W]hat is needed is an appreciation of the width of the field, and thus whether a selection is
to be made merely from a dozen or, instead, from thousands or millions.’

75
Q

duty to survey the field

for fiduciary powers, the duty appears …

A

lesser

76
Q

duty to survey the field

for fiduciary powers, the duty appears lesser Case

A

Re Gestener’s Settlement

77
Q

duty to survey the field- fiduciary powers

in Re Gestener’s Settlement what suggestion was given as to how the test may be framed

A 
T]here is no obligation on the trustees to do more than consider – from time to time, I suppose 
– the merits of such persons of the specified class as are known to them and, if they think fit, 
to give them something.
78
Q

duty to survey the field

what do all the tests clearly show

A

the tests clearly colour the duty to inform beneficiaries

79
Q

duty to survey the field

what must trustees consider with regards to trust property or fiduciary power

A

Trustees must consider whether to make appointments of trust property or exercise a
fiduciary power within a reasonable time. They must appoint the property of a
discretionary trust at some point

80
Q

duty to survey the field

3 cases which show that trustees must consider whether to make appointments of trust property or exercise a
fiduciary power within a reasonable time

A
  • Re Baden’s Trusts (No1)
  • Re Locker’s Settlement
  • Breadner v Granville-Grossman
81
Q

Administrative Unworkability

what is this and what does it apply to

A

whether, given that and the
trust’s terms, the trust is even workable.

In practice this only applies to discretionary
trusts, since for fixed trusts one needs a complete list anyway and for fiduciary powers
one may rationally decline to exercise the power

82
Q

Administrative Unworkability

case to show what it is

A

Re Hay’s ST

83
Q

Administrative Unworkability

when is Administrative Unworkability usually a problem

A

it is generally only a problem with extremely large classes of objects

84
Q

Administrative Unworkability

2 cases to show that Administrative Unworkability is a problem with large classes of objects

A

Re Gulbenkian’s Settlements: would the cost of administering the trust outweigh the benefits it would provide?

Re Baden’s Deed Trusts (No 1): if the
‘definition of beneficiaries is so hopelessly wide as not to form “anything like a class”’ such as ‘all the residents of Greater London.’

85
Q

Administrative Unworkability

which case shows discretionary trust failing for want of administrative unworkability

A

R v District Auditor, ex p West Yorkshire Metropolitan County Council: (to ‘any or all or some of the inhabitants of West Yorkshire’)

86
Q

Capriciousness

how is this a further concern for discretionary trusts and all kinds of powers

A

there is an uncertain (and rarely seen) doctrine of capriciousness that will invalidate a trust where it
is petty and useless. The line between this and administrative unworkability is blurry, but
is one example of something workable but capricious

87
Q

Capriciousness

case

A

Brown v Burdett: (testator devised house to trustees to block up most of the rooms for 20 years before final transfer).

88
Q

Capriciousness

which case is an example that would be administratively unworkable but not capricious

A

Re Hay’s ST: a trust to benefit ‘all the residents of Greater London’ would not be capricious if the settlor were, say, ‘a former chairman of the
Greater London Council’.

89
Q

Perpetuities

explain the term

A

There is a long-standing policy of the law the wealth cannot be tied up indefinitely; it should be used. Consequently there are rules governing how long money is tied up in investments before it must be applied. Failure to comply results in a trust being void.

90
Q

Effect of Failure of the Three Certainties

when will the trust fail

A

If there is insufficient certainty of any one of the three certainties, the trust will fail.

91
Q

Effect of Failure of the Three Certainties

how will the trust end up failing if there is insufficient certainty of any of the 3 certainties

A

That depends on whether the property has been transferred, whether the trust is self-declared by the settlor-trustee or whether settlor and trustee are separate, and which certainty or certainties failed.

92
Q

Effect of Failure of the Three Certainties

what can the trustee not do

A

a trustee cannot keep trust property for
herself; the settlor has tried to create an arrangement where the trustee does not take
beneficial interest in the property … unless there is no intention to create a trust!

93
Q

Preliminary Point: Resulting Trusts

case

A

Dyer v Dyer: equitable ownership ‘results to
the man who advances the purchase money’.

equity presumes, in the absence of something to rebut that presumption, that the person who provides the money intends to retain beneficial ownership of it.

94
Q

Certainty of Intention

what happens if a settlor fails to self-declare a trust

A

If a settlor fails to self-declare a trust, she remains the owner of the property

95
Q

Certainty of Intention

case to show if settlor fails to self-declare a trust, she remains owner of the property

A

Jones v Lock

96
Q

Certainty of Intention

what happens if there has been transfer of property to the would be trustee

A

If there has been a transfer of property to the would-be trustee, there is no trust but an absolute transfer; a gift.

97
Q

Certainty of Subject Matter

what happens If the property cannot be ascertained

A

If the property cannot be ascertained, similarly there is no trust and ownership remains with the settlor for self-declared trusts.

98
Q

Certainty of Subject Matter

what happens if the property has been transferred, what does it show

A

If property has been transferred, that goes some way to indicate it was well-defined

99
Q

Certainty of Subject Matter

what happens if well-defined property has been transferred but the trust does not define the part of it to be held on trust

A

But if well-defined property has been transferred but the trust declared over it does not define the part of it to be held on trust sufficiently clearly, ownership remains with the transferee

100
Q

Certainty of Subject Matter

what is the more difficult case and what happens

A

The more difficult case is where the beneficiaries’ shares cannot be identified. Then
transferred property is held on resulting trust for the settlor (or deceased testator’s estate).

101
Q

Certainty of Objects

what happens if a fixed or discretionary trust fails because the certainty of objects test fails

A

If a fixed or discretionary trust fails because the relevant certainty of objects test fails, the transferred property is again held on resulting trust.

102
Q

Certainty of Objects

what happens if a fiduciary power fails for want of certainty of objects

A

If a fiduciary power fails for want of certainty of objects, the transferred property is held for the recipient of the gift over absolutely.

103
Q

Certainty of Objects

what happens if there are different groups amalgamated into the class of discretionary trust objects and there is a want of certainty relating to only one group

A

If there are different groups amalgamated into the class of discretionary trust objects and there is a want of certainty relating to only one group, it is possible to sever that group from the class and save the trust?

104
Q

Certainty of Objects

case for different groups amalgamated into the class of discretionary trust objects

A

Re Wright’s WT

105
Q

The Beneficiary Principle

what is this principle and why does it exist

A

There is also a principle that trusts are for people, nor purposes: the ‘beneficiary principle’. This is because a trust needs an enforcer, i.e. someone to sue the trustee if he fails to comply with his duties.

equity (5 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions