Express Terms Flashcards
Do all contract terms need to be stated in a written contract?
No
Terms can also be implied or agreed orally
What is a term?
A statement of fact which the parties intend to be binding
What is a representation?
It is a statement of fact or law which induce the making of the contract which the parties do not intend to be binding
How is a representation different from a term?
Unlike a term a representation is not legally binding
What is a mere puff?
A statement of no legal significance
How do the courts assess whether a statement is a representation or term?
Courts will apply an objective test - ‘what would a reasonable person understand to be the intention of the parties, having regard to all the circumstances?’
What inference arises where a statement is made during negotiation for the purpose of inducing the other party to enter into contract?
Inference that the statement was intended to be binding so a term (albeit this is rebuttable)
What will courts take into account when regarding the importance of the statement in deciding whether it is intended to be a term or a representation?
Courts will consider the importance attached to it by one of the parties.
If it can be shown the injured party considered it so important that it would not have entered into the contract if it were not for that statement, then it is likely a term.
What will courts take into account when regarding timing of the statement in deciding whether it is intended to be a term or a representation?
If the statement was made at the time of contracting, more likely to be term than if it was made early in negotiations
What will courts take into account when regarding the reduction of the contract into writing in deciding whether it is intended to be a term or a statement?
If statement is not reduced into writing but rest of contract is, then unlikely to be a term
What will courts take into account when regarding the special skill or knowledge of the parties in deciding whether it is intended to be a term or a statement?
Where the party who made the statement has special skill or knowledge in relation to the statement, this is likely to be count in favour of the party trying to rely on the statement as a term
What will courts take into account when regarding the assumption of responsibility/further checks in deciding whether it is intended to be a term or a statement?
A statement may become a term of the contract where the vendor expressly accepts the responsibility for the soundness of the sale item in question
If however defendant with statement insists the other party makes further checks to verify statement then unlikely to be term
How are the express terms of a contract ascertained?
By asking what the objective observer would think that the parties intended to be bound by
They are the essence of the agreement between the parties
What is the effect of signing the contract?
In almost all cases, signing of a contract will show the parties intended to be bound by a contract even if they did not read the contract before signing
When will a party not be bound by a contract they have signed?
If what they signed was not intended to have contractual effect as signing such a document does not show an intention to be bound