Explanations for Forgetting: Interference Flashcards
Interference:
Forgetting because one memory blocks another, causing one or both memories to be distorted or forgotten.
Proactive Interference: PI
Forgetting occurs when older memories, already stored, disrupt the recall of newer memories memories. The degree of forgetting is greater when the memories are similar.
Retroactive Interference: RI
Forgetting occurs when newer memories disrupt the recall of older memories already stored. The degree of forgetting is again greater when the memories are similar.
Effects of Similarity: Procedure
John McGeoch and William McDonald (1931):
Studied retroactive interference by changing the amount of similarity between 2 sets of material. Learn a list of 10 words until they could remember them with 100% accuracy:
Group 1: synonyms- words with the same meanings as the originals.
Group 2: antonyms- words with the opposite meanings to the originals.
Group 3: words unrelated to the original ones.
Group 4: consonant syllables.
Group 5: 3 digit numbers.
Group 6: no new list- these participants just rested.
McGeoch and McDonald: Findings
- When the participants then recalled the original list of words, their performance depended on the nature on the second list.
- The most similar material produced the worst recall. This shows that interference is strongest when the memories are similar.
Underwood and Postman (1960) Aim and Procedure:
- Aim: Underwood and Postman (1960) investigated how retroactive interference affects learning.
- A laboratory experiment with two groups of participants (control and experimental groups).
- Both groups were given word pairs to learn e.g. dog-bread, chair-fork etc.
- The experimental group was also given a second list to learn where the second word in the pair was changed e.g. dog-cake, chair-window etc. 5. Both groups were then asked to recall the original list.
U&P Results and Evaluation:
- The recall of the control group was much better than the experimental group.
- The experimental group’s recall had been affected by retroactive interference.
- Easy to replicate.
- Practical applications for education, in particular revision.
- The results could be explained by the limited capacity of STM rather than retroactive interference.
- Interference only really explains forgetting when two pieces of information are really similar.
E: Evidence from Lab Studies
- One of the most consistently demonstrated findings in psychology, thousands of experiments into forgetting.
- Many shows that both types of interference are likely to be common ways we forget information from LTM.
- Lab experiments control the effects of irrelevant influences and thus give confidence that interference is a valid explanation for at least some forgetting.
Evaluation: Real Life Studies
- Baddeley and Hitch (1977) wanted to find out interference was a better explanation than the passage of time.
- Asked rugby players to remember the names of the teams they had played so far in that season week by week.
- Most of the players had missed games, so for them the last team was weeks ago.
- Results showed that accurate recall depended more on how many matches had taken place in the meantime not how long ago the matches were.
- Shows that interference explanations can apply to some everyday situations.
E: Artificial Materials
- There’s a greater chance that interference will be demonstrated in a lab than in real-life situations.
- The stimulus materials were often words, more realistic than learning lists of consonant syllables.
- Still quite a distance from the things we learn and try to remember everyday like faces and names.
- Limitation because the use of artificial tasks mask interference much more likely in the lab, may not be a good explanation for real life.