Explanations for forgetting Flashcards

proactive and retroactive interference and retrieval failure due to absence of cues

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

define interference

A

an explanation for forgetting which suggests we forget because our long term memories become disrupted by other information while it is coded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the 2 types of interference?

A

proactive and retroactive interference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

define proactive interference

A

an explanation for forgetting which suggests old information already stored disrupts the recall of new information
proactive –> forward acting –> new memories are interfered with

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

define retroactive interference

A

an explanation for forgetting which suggests new information being stored disrupts with the recall of old information
retroactive –> backwards acting –> old memories are interfered with

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

interference is more likely to occur when…

A

the two pieces of information are similar - due to response competition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

interference is less likely to occur when…

A

there is a large gap between the instances of learning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

research evidence for retroactive interference

A

Schmidt et al (2000) investigated retroactive interference using the memory of childhood street names
11-79 year-olds were sent a questionnaire containing a map of the area around their old school without street names
found that the more times an individual moved home, the fewer street names recalled - negative correlation
suggests that the process of remembering new streets names interferes with the previously stored LTM of old streets making recall of older streets harder - provides evidence for retroactive interference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

research evidence for proactive interference

A

Greenberg and Underwood (1950) asked PPs to learn 10 paired word lists and gave them 48hrs before recall - repeated 4x
found that the number of correctly recalled word pairs decreased the more word pairs had been learnt previously (65% for the 1st list –> 24% for the 4th list)
suggests that previously learnt word combinations caused confusion in the coding of later word lists, interfering with the accurate recall of these words lists - provides evidence for proactive interference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

define cue dependant forgetting

A

information in LTM is forgotten due to absence of appropriate cues/prompts encoded at the same time - encoding specificity principle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the types of retrieval cues?

A

context-dependant cues
state-dependant cues
category-dependant cues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

define context dependent cues

A

aspects of the external environment work as cues to memory (e.g. sights, sounds, smells) so being in a different place when trying to retrieve a memory would inhibit the memory as we lack environmental cues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

research evidence supporting context-dependent cues

A

Godden & Baddeley (1975) studied divers, asking them to learn new material underwater or on land then tested their recall underwater or on land
findings: recall best when context was the same
suggests being in the same environment for both learning and recall aids recall by providing context cues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

define state-dependent cues

A

aspects of our internal environment work as cues to memory (e.g. emotions, drugs) so being in a different emotional state would inhibit memory as we would lack state dependent cues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

research evidence supporting state-dependent cues

A

Overton (1972) asked PPs to learn material drunk or sober then tested them drunk or sober
findings: recall was best when in the same internal state
suggests being in the same state for learning and recall aids recall by providing state-dependent cues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

define category-dependent cues

A

providing cues that relate to the category of memories may aid recall as its easier to find a file if the draws are labelled
the most effective cues have fewer things associated with them
lack of category cues may inhibit memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

research evidence supporting category-dependent cues

A

Tulving & Pealstone (1966) asked PPs to learn 48 words using recall in any order or recall to match 12 4-word categories
findings: PPs recalled more in category condition
suggests that categories acted as cues and aided recall

17
Q

evaluations for explanations for forgetting

A

+ real practical applications in developing effective revision strategies (context cues)
+ real life application in developing effective police technique - cognitive interviews
- limited explanation as interference and cue theory may only explain a temporary loss of information
- limited as it only explains forgetting when 2 sets of info are similar or learnt close together in time - fails to explain daily examples e.g. forgetting a bday
+ lab experiments - high internal validity due to control over extraneous variables making it easy to replicate
- lab experiments - lack external validity due to artificial nature of the experiment - interference may not occur to the same extent in real-life scenarios - lack mundane realism