Explaining Class Differences In Achievement [Inside and Outside Of School Factors] Flashcards
Becker (1971)
Found that teachers see middle class pupils as closest to the “ideal pupil” in terms of performance, conduct, appearance and attitude. Whilst working class are furthest away from this. Interactionalists argue that labels that are applied to students shape the interactions that will be had between the student and pupil. Teachers consciously or unconsciously communicate these labels to students, the student will then react to either positively or negatively and this may create a “self fulfilling prophecy” meaning the students will internalise and conform to the label given. Therefore this could negatively affect working class students as they may be labelled as non achievers or deviant leading them to conform to this.
Keddie (1971)
Researched streaming (grouping of student based on ability) found evidence of teachers expectation being less for those in the bottom streams which undermines the quality of teaching-
- ‘A’ streamers were trusted to work with the minimum of supervision and to make a contribution to class discussion.
- ‘C’ streamers were in need of supervision and constant social control meaning they are very rarely left on their own. Studies make a link between streaming and development of anti school subcultures. Students were found students lived down to the labels and did not receive best teaching due to teachers attitudes and efforts.
Hargreaves (1967)
Carried out an influential study in 1967 comparing two streams of boys in secondary school, the selection of these streams was closely related to behaviour, top streams were rewarded well for conforming behaviour and academic achievement. The lower stream of boys felt as though they were unable to achieve highly in teachers eyes, so instead resorted to peer status by forming anti school culture.
Hargreaves identified the following processes of labelling occurring between teachers about their students.
-Speculation
-Working hypothesis
-Elaboration
-Stabilisation
Abrahams
Discussed the interconnection of several factors such as setting, labelling and subcultures as an explanation as to why students may be underachieving. He states that dominant class and gender ideologies of society are promoted in education by teacher subconsciously through labelling. He also states that streaming should be stopped all together in schools.
Mac an Ghail
Conducted a study named the “Making of Men” which examined a predominately working class inner city industrial area in the midlands. He found one subcultural group was named “Macho Lads” for these boys their ability to perform heavy, physical, manual labour work became a way for them to shape their working class identity. De-industrialisation however led to them facing a crisis of masculinity. There was now a shift to part-time roles that were office based and traditionally ‘suited the lifestyles of women’. For those that could no longer gain these traditional working class jobs, they only had the options of:
-Becoming upwardly mobile to gain the new working class, white collar jobs
-To face the prospect of low-paid work
-To face long-term unemployment
Willis
12 working class boys in a midlands secondary school in his study ‘Learning to Labour’. He argued that these lads’ (as they identified themselves) formed a distinctive “counter-school
sub-cultural grouping” characterised by opposition to the values and norms perpetuated throughout the school. This group of disaffected boys felt superior to the more conformist pupils who they disparagingly labelled as ‘ear oles’. They showed little interest in academic work, preferring instead to amuse themselves as best they could through various forms of deviant behaviour in which ‘having a laff’ became the main objective of the school day. The lads also tried to identify with the adult, non-school world, by smoking, drinking and expressing strongly sexist and racist attitudes.
The lads’ behaviour in schools relates to the behaviour they adopted in their work life later, Willis continued his study into the Lad’s workplace - the ‘shop floor’ of local factories. He found that the counter school culture helped prepare them for the boredom and monotony of the work they were to do later on, they adopted similar distraction techniques in the workplace such as joking around, only taking enough care to avoid being sacked in the workplace.
Althusser
The education system is part of the superstructure (the institutions of society) it is directly impacted by the infrastructure (the economic base of society owned by the ruling class), meaning that he suggests it is designed in a way that will ultimately benefit the Bourgeoisie. Althusser suggests that education performs two roles:
• To pass on necessary skills to create a workforce
• To pass on ruling class ideologies to ensure the working class conform
Althusser suggests that the ruling class use ideological control’ within education as a way of making sure that students conform to rules etc as a way of training them for the workplace. He states that education is part of what he calls the ‘ideological state apparatus
-This refers to how the institutions are used by the ruling class to help pass on their ideologies. He states that if physical force were used to ensure a productive workforce, the masses could resist and not conform to this.
Bowles & Gintis
Suggest that education serves to reproduce the capitalist relations of production (the hierarchy of workers from the boss down) with the appropriate skills and attitudes. They also state that education ensures that workers will unquestioningly adapt to the needs of the system - They call this the ‘correspondence principle. The correspondence principle suggests that what goes on in school corresponds directly to the world of work, for example teachers are like bosses and pupils are like workers who work for rewards.
Durkheim
claimed that education should emphasise the moral responsibilities that members of society have towards each other. It should pass on social solidarity and a value consensus i.e. shared norms and values. Durkheim also says that educations ensures people have the skills for a specialised division of labour E.g. through subject specific skills that lead onto certain vocations such as links between the sciences and health occupations. He claimed that standardised testing helps to assess skills.
Davis & Moore
Similarly to Durkheim, Davis and Moore claimed that education performs role allocation and helps to sift, sort and grade students (education helps with this For example A grades versus D grades AND Vocational versus Academic subjects) people in terms of ability which is rewarded in exam success. Those with the most ability are then rewarded in a meritocratic society in terms of economic rewards to ensure the best people fill the most functionally important roles.
Eysenck
States that IQ is largely inherited - He claims that between 60-80% of intelligence is genetically based. Eysenck also claims that What children take out of school is proportional to what they bring into the schools in terms of IQ’ and also states that class differences in intelligence largely account for class differences in educational attainment.
Smith and Noble
Discusses that some students face
‘Financial Barriers to Learning’ - due to their parents’ low income - Smith and Noble state that due to these barriers, parents are unable to afford the following:
• Unable to afford school uniforms, transport, textbooks and class materials which can lead to isolation and bullying.
Less likely to have a computer/desk/Homework area.
Marketisation of schools means the better resourced schools in affluent areas.
• Pupils more likely to work part time or care for younger siblings if parents do shift work.
Raey et al
Discusses the idea that economic capital is needed to gain cultural capital, meaning that some students miss out on this which has a negative impact on their educational attainment. Raey et al also claim that private education is another way of paying into cultural capital, meaning that those who do not have access to this face educational disadvantages. They also claim that working class students are more likely to have part time jobs and therefore more likely to work longer hours reducing their chances of attaining higher grades in education. Finally, they acknowledge that over 25% of private school students have extra tuition compared to only 10% of state school students, therefore highlighting the importance of social class on a child’s achievement.
Palmer
50% of BAME are from low income families which will impact life chances , ie , lack of economic capital to achieve in education fully. (Tutors recourses etc.)
Calendar and Jackson
Carried out surveys on 2,000 prospective HE students, and examined their attitudes towards debt, class positions and decisions for HE destinations (University).
They discuss the ‘Fear of Debt’ and found that those afraid of debt (generally the working classes) were four times less likely to apply for university. They state that this fear was greatest among the poor and explain that the thought of debt stopped them applying completely.