expert witness Flashcards

1
Q

what date, what lab, and what bench?

A

10th april, lab 03009, bench 1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how many packages, what were they, and who packaged them?

A

2, KG001, KG002, KEITH GRANT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what did you label them and why?

A

KG001 - a
KG012 - b, c, d, and e
because they were handed to me prepackaged by KG, 1 bag with 1 bone in it, 1 bag with 4 bones in it, so I labelled them a-e to make identification and continuity easier

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

bone a: preliminary examinations

A

morphologically smooth, small, cuboid shaped bone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

bone a: length in mm

A

27 mm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

bone a: what bone is it, and why?

A

proximal phalange, probably of the thumb as it is stout and robust, but not long enough to be a big toe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

bone a: sex?

A

unclear as to which sex at this time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

bone b: preliminary examinations

A

identified to be animal bone, texture was very smooth and was very light weight

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

bone b: length in mm

A

121 mm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

bone b: what bone is it, and why?

A

femur because:
- femoral head and greater trochanter located on the proximal side
- intercondylar fossa

not a humerus because:
- the ridge would be less deep if it were a radial fossa
- the lack of the supratrochlear foramen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

bone b: why is it animal and not human?

A

similar characteristics as a human femur, but much smaller, much lighter, and not dimpled/textured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

bone b: what animal?

A

most likely cat, but not confirmed, would need to cut into it to get a more definitive answer. could possibly be fox as the meausrement is more in range with cat but within the lower range of fox.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

bone c: preliminary examination

A

human bone, fragmented, large, long bone, heavy, smooth shaft, dimpled head

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

bone c: what bone is it and why?

A

femur becuase:
- length
- weight
- distal end characteristics (prominent intercondylar fossa)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

bone c: sex?

A

sex identification is unclear at this point due to the fragmented nature of the bone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

bone d: preliminary examination

A

medium, irregular shaped bone, dimpled and textured, fairly heavy

17
Q

bone d: length, diameter, height in mm

A

L 78 mm
D 29 mm
H 44 mm

18
Q

bone d: what bone is it, and why?

A

calcaneus because:
- 3 articular surfaces (posterior, middle, anterior talar articular surfaces)
- calcaneal sulcus
- sustenculum tali
(last two support achilles tendon and the plantar fascia)

19
Q

bone d: sex?

A

tarsal bones are not usually used to identify sex, so it is unclear.

20
Q

bone e: preliminary examination

A

iregular shaped bone, light weight

21
Q

bone e: length in mm

A

59 mm

22
Q

bone e: what bone is it, and why?

A

talus because:
- trochlea of the talus is identifieable because it is broader on the anterior plane than the posterior (hinge movement)
- lateral posterior process

23
Q

bone e: sex?

A

tarsal bones are not usually used to identify sex, so it is unclear.
However, the lateral posterior process is AKA the Stieda process is considered an anatomical variant identified in some men, but no women. Still, this is necassarily not indicative of sex.

24
Q

Final remarks RE sex

A

Due to either the size/importance, whether the bone was complete or not, and the location and type of bone, sex identification for the individual bones was not possible. However looking at the bones as a whole, they are all on the larger side of the average ranges respecitively, possibly indicating MALE, but again, this is not conclusive.