Expert Testimony Flashcards
If the witness is not testifying as an expert, any testimony he or she gives that is an opinion or an inference must be?
Rationally based on perception. The witness must have first-hand knowledge.
What is the scope of non-expert opinions?
A layman can testify about:
- Value of one’s land
- Their emotion
- Measurements
- Physical States (intoxicated, short, fat tall, healthy)
- Sensory Descriptions
- Sanity of the testator (when probating a will).
What are the limits on layman opinions?
Opinions stated in conclusory terms are not appropriate. Legal conclusions must be avoided.
Examples of Legal Conclusions:
The plaintiff was contributorily negligent
A contract existed
Defendant assaulted victim.
What are the requirements for expert testimony?
- Qualified: an expert must have special knowledge, skill, experience, education, or training
- Relevant: Subject matter must be appropriate, and the opinion must be helpful/relevant to assist the jury.
- The discipline is reliable.
What must an expert opinion be based upon?
Reliable methods, devices, or techniques.
The reliability of scientific tests is determined by?
The trial court
What are the daubert factors for expert evidence?
Weighs:
- Whether the method has be tested
- If accepted in the relevant community
- If Peer-reviewed
- The degree of possible errors
- Standards employed.
What is the majority/minority split on factors are used to examine an expert’s theory?
Majority: Daubert Factors
Minority: Frye (general acceptance in the community standard)
What are the three bases for opinion testimony of experts?
- Personal knowledge at or before trial of expert
- Hypothetical question given to an expert at trial
- Facts given to the expert outside of court.
What is the requirement for out of court facts that are given to an expert in preparation for testimony?
The facts must be the type reasonably relied upon by experts in that particular field.
What is the consequence when out of court facts that the expert relies upon consist of evidence that is inadmissible at trial?
The facts cannot be revealed unless the proponent shows the probative value of the evidence substantially outweighs its prejudicial effect.
Does a expert have to testify to the underlying facts or data used?
No, unless the court requires or required to disclose them on cross.
Which type of witness can give an opinion on an ultimate issue?
Only Experts
List the circumstances in which an expert can pass an opinion on the ultimate issue?
- Cause of accident, illness, death
- Whether a product is unreasonably dangerous/defective
- Whether a document is forged/genuine
- Whether defendant was insane/mentally ill
Or
- The standard of care in a civil malpractice action or a crime.
When can an expert not pass an opinion on the ultimate issue?
- Legal conclusion that plaintiff was contributorily negligent
Or
- Legal conclusions regarding the content of law (e.g. defendant intended to kill the victim).