existence of god-reason Flashcards

1
Q

what type of argument is used in this?

A

a priori

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Anselm’s definition of God

A

that than which nothing greater can be conceived

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does Anselm call people who don’t believe in God

A

fools
the fool says in his heart there is no God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Anselm’s analogy to show things that exist are greater than those in the mind (1st formulation)

A

painter who has an idea of a painting but it is greater once it has been painted because it now also exists in reality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Do atheists and theists have a common understanding about the definition of God?(1st formulation)

A

Yes, universal understanding of God- even if don’t accept that he exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is Anselm’s final conclusion (1st formulation)

A

it is greater to exist in reality than mind alone and God is ‘than that which nothing greater can be conceived’ so God must exist in reality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Anselm’s ontological argument justifies belief in God

A

-agreement with definition of God
-a priori-senses deceive
-valid reasoning that things existing in reality are greater than mind
-contradiction to say he doesn’t exist as he is that than which nothing greater can be conceived

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Anselm’s ontological argument doesn’t justify belief in God

A

-hard to come up with definition of God- have no knowledge and he isn’t physical
-a posteriori at least use evidence
-things can be better in mind- flying carpets

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How does Gaunilo criticise Anselm’s logic of things existing in the mind and therefore reality

A

is possible to imagine something that does not exist
island analogy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does Gaunilo accuse Anselm of doing

A

defining things into existence
e.g.unicorn

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does Gaunilo criticise Anselm’s use of reason alone?

A

can’t claim to understand God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does Russel suggest is a measure of meaningful existence?

A

if the existence refers to an ‘instance’
e.g. we see an instance of cows but not of unicorns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How does Anselm respond to Gaunilo’s criticisms?

A

God- necessary being
Island- contingent
greater to be a necessary being, God is greatest conceivable thing, God is a necessary being and because of this he must exist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does Platinga support Anselm?

A

an island has no intrinsic maxim-can always be improved(more trees)
God has an intrinsic maxim-greatest conceivable- so he exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does Kant argue all statements about existence must be?

A

synthetic- need to go outside of a concept and find external evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What example does kant use for synthetic statements?

A

Logically necessary for triangle to have 3 sides
however…
it isn’t necessary for it to exist in reality
therefore not a contradiction to reject concept of (God/triangle)

17
Q

Why does Kant say ontological arguments are invalid?

A

existence is not a real predicate

18
Q

What example does he give of existence not being a predicate?

A

100 real thalers is same amount as 100 possible thalers- concept is same whether real or not

19
Q

How can you challenge Kant’s argument about existence not being a predicate?

A

Anselm’s reply to Gaunilo-existence is a predicate as we are attributing existence in divine terms to God- perfect existence

20
Q

Who else supports existence as a predicate?

A

Norman Malcolm-contingent existence is different to necessary existence
- necessary existence does add info

21
Q

What is Descarte’s definition of God?

A

a supremely perfect being who contains supremely perfect characteristics

22
Q

what is one of God’s essential characteristics according to Descartes?

23
Q

2 examples from Descartes and how they relate to God

A

a triangle must have 3 sides- without this it isn’t a triangle
can’t separate idea of a mountain from a valley
like…
existence can’t be separated from god as it is part of the essence of god

24
Q

logical fallacies for arguments for existence of God

A

making assumptions:
-their definitions of god would be universally accepted?
-God is a special case, greatest possible being, necessary, perfect
-existence is a predicate

25
a priori are more persuasive
-rely on reason and logic- don't need senses which can deceieve(Plato, Descartes -premises have to lease to conclusion-once premise are agreed to be valid conclusion cannot be denied -don't rely on evidence
26
a posteriori are more persuasive
-rely on empiricism-everyone can experience -use synthetic evidence-probable conclusion -start from what is known to reach unknown