EXERCISE: LEARNING TO TRADE AND EDGE LIKE A CASINO’ Flashcards
The object of this exercise is to convince yourself that trading is just a simple game of
probabilities
(numbers), not much different from pulling the handle of a slot machine.
At the micro level, the
outcomes to individual edges are
independent occurrences and random in relationship to one another
At the macro level, the outcomes over a series of trades will produce
consistent results
From a
probabilities perspective, this means that instead of being the person playing the slot machine, as a
trader, you can be the casino, if:
- you have an edge that genuinely puts the odds of success in your favor;
- you can think about trading in the appropriate manner (the five fundamental truths); and
- you can do everything you need to do over a series of trades. Then, like the casinos, you will own the
game and be a consistent winner.
SETTING UP THE EXERCISE
Pick a market.
options trading
Choose a set of market variables that define an edge.
This can be any trading system you want. The
trading system or methodology you choose can be mathematical, mechanical, or visual (based on
patterns in price charts).
It doesn’t matter whether you personally design the system or purchase it from
someone else, nor do you need to take a long time or be too picky trying to find or develop the best or
right system. This exercise is not about system development and it is not a test of your analytical
abilities.
In fact, the variables you choose can even be considered mediocre by most traders’ standards,
because what you are going to learn from doing this exercise is not dependent upon whether you
actually make money.
If you consider this exercise an educational expense, it will
cut down on the amount of time and effort
you might otherwise expend trying to find the most profitable edges.
Trade Entry
The variables you use to define your edge have to be
absolutely precise
The system has
to be designed so that it does not require you to make any subjective decisions or judgments about
whether your edge is present.
If the market is aligned in a way that conforms with the rigid variables of
your system, then you have a trade; if not,
then you don’t have a trade. Period! No other extraneous or
random factors can enter into the equation.
Stop-Loss Exit.
The same conditions apply to getting out of a trade that’s not working. Your
methodology has to tell you exactly how much you need to
risk to find out if the trade is going to work.
There is always an optimum point at which the possibility of a trade not working is so diminished,
especially in relationship to the profit potential, that you’re better off
taking your loss and getting your
mind clear to act on the next edge.
Let the market structure determine where this optimum point is,
rather than
than using an arbitrary dollar amount that you are willing to risk on a trade.
In any case,
whatever system you choose, it has to be absolutely exact, requiring no
subjective decision making, Again, no extraneous or random variables can enter into the equation.
Time Frame. Your trading methodology can be in any time frame that suits you, but all your entry and
exit signals have to be done on
same time frame.
For example, if you use variables that identify
a particular support and resistance pattern on a 30-minute bar chart, then your risk and profit objective
calculations also have to be determined in a
30-minute time frame
However, trading in one time frame
does not preclude you from using other time frames as
filters.
For example, you could have as a filter a
rule that states you’re only going to take trades that are in the direction of the
major trend.
There’s an
old trading axiom that “The
trend is your friend.”
“The trend is your friend.” It means that you have
a higher probability of success
when you trade in the direction of the major trend, if there is one
“The trend is your friend.”
In fact, the lowest-risk trade, with the
highest probability of success, occurs when you are buying
dips (support) in an up-trending market or
selling rallies (resistance) in a down-trending market.
To illustrate how this rule works, let’s say that
you’ve chosen a precise way of identifying support and resistance patterns in a 30- minute time frame
as your edge. The rule is that you are only going to
take trades in the direction of the major trend.
A
trending market is defined as a series of
higher highs and higher lows for an up-trending market and a
series of lower highs and lower lows for a downtrending market.
The longer the time frame, the more
significant the trend, so a trending market on a daily bar chart is more significant than a trending
market on a 30-minute bar chart. Therefore
the trend on the daily bar chart would take precedence over
the trend on the, 30-minute bar chart and would be considered the major trend
To determine the direction of the major trend, look at what is happening on
daily bar chart.
To determine the direction of the major trend, look at what is happening on a daily bar chart. If the
trend is up on the daily, you are only going to
look for a sell-off or retracement down to what your edge
defines as support on the 30-minute chart. That’s where you will become a buyer.
On the other hand, if
the trend is down on the daily, you are only going to look for a
rally up to what your edge defines as a
resistance level to be a seller on the 30-minute chart.
On the other hand, if
the trend is down on the daily, you are only going to look for a rally up to what your edge defines as a
resistance level to be a seller on the 30-minute chart. Your objective is to
determine, in a downtrending market, how far it can rally on an intraday basis and still not violate the symmetry of the
longer trend.
In an up-trending market, your objective is to determine
how far it can sell off on an
intraday basis without violating the symmetry of the longer trend.
. In an up-trending market, your objective is to determine how far it can sell off on an
intraday basis without violating the symmetry of the longer trend. There’s usually
very little risk
associated with these intraday support and resistance points, because you don’t have to let the market
go very far beyond them to tell you the trade isn’t working.
Taking Profits. Believe it or not, of all the skills one needs to learn to be a consistently successful
trader, learning to take profits is probably the most difficult ____
to master.
A multitude of personal, often
very
complicated psychological factors, as well as the effectiveness of one’s market analysis, enter into
the equation.
There is a way to set up a profit-taking regime that at least fulfills the
objective of the fifth principle of consistency (“I
pay myself as the market makes money available to me”).
If you’re going to establish a belief in yourself that you’re a consistent winner, then you will have to
create experiences that correspond with that belief.
If you’re going to establish a belief in yourself that you’re a consistent winner, then you will have to
create experiences that correspond with that belief. Because the object of the belief is
winning
consistently, how you take profits in a winning trade is of paramount importance.
You would have to be an
extremely sophisticated and objective analyst to make the distinction between a
normal retracement,
when the market still has the potential to move in the original direction of your trade, and a retracement
that isn’t normal, when the potential for any further movement in the original direction of your trade is
greatly diminished, if not nonexistent.
If you never know how far the market is going to go in your direction, then when and how do you take
profits? The question of when is a function of your ability to
to read the market and pick the most likely
spots for it to stop.
In the absence of an ability to read the market and pick the most likely
spots for it to stop to do this objectively, the best course of action from a
psychological perspective is to
divide your position into thirds (or quarters), and scale out the position
as the market moves in your favor.
If you are trading futures contracts, this means your minimum
position for a trade is at least
three (or four) contracts
For stocks, the minimum position is any number
of shares that is divisible by three (or four), so you don’t end up
with an odd-lot order
. On average, only one out of every ten trades was an immediate
loser that never went in my direction. Out of the other 25 to 30 percent of the trades that were
ultimately losers, the market usually went in my direction by three or four tics before revising and
stopping me out. I calculated that if I got into the habit of taking at least a
third of my original position
off every time the market gave me those three or four tics, at the end of the year the accumulated
winnings would go a long way towards paying my expenses.
I was right. To this day, I always, without
reservation or hesitation, take off a portion of a winning position whenever the
market gives me a little
to take.
Using a three-contract trade as an
example, here’s how it works:
If I get into a position and the market immediately goes against me
without giving me at least four tics first, I get stopped out of the trade for an 18-tic loss, but as I’ve
indicated, this doesn’t happen often. More likely, the trade goes in my favor by some small amount
before becoming a loser. If it goes in my favor by at least four tics, I take those four tics on one
contract. What I have done is reduce my total risk on the other two contracts by 10 tics. If the market
then stops me out of the last two contracts, the net loss on the trade is only 8 tics. If I don’t get stopped
out on the last two contracts and the market moves in my direction, I take the next third of the position
off at some predetermined profit objective.
If I get into a position and the market immediately goes against me
without giving me at least four tics first, I get stopped out of the trade for an 18-tic loss, but as I’ve
indicated, this doesn’t
happen often. More likely, the trade goes in my favor by some small amount
before becoming a loser.
If it goes in my favor by at least four tics, I take those four tics on one
contract. What I have done is reduce my total risk on the other two contracts by 10 tics. If the market
then stops me out of the last two contracts, the net loss on the trade is only 8 tics. If I don’t get stopped
out on the last two contracts and the market moves in my direction, I take the next third of the position
off at some
predetermined profit objective.