Execution of Wills Flashcards
What is required for a validly executed will?
- Signed by testator
- Two attesting witnesses
- Each witness must sign in testator’s presence
What is a codicil?
A later amendment or supplement on the same will
What is necessary for a valid codicil?
Same as a will:
- Signed by testator
- Two attesting witnesses
- Each witness must sign in testator’s presence
What is NOT required for IL?
- Testator sign “at the foot or end” of the will
- That the witnesses know they are witnessing a will (no “will publication” requirement)
- That the witnesses sign in EACH OTHER’S presence
Tess types a will that disposes all her property. She takes the will across the street to Ned’s house and asks him to witness, and he signs. Tess’s signature was barely legible. Tess then takes it to Oliver, her other neighbor. Oliver thought he was signing a power of attorney. Is this a validly executed will?
Yes, signed by testator, witnesses don’t have to sign in the same room, just contemporaneous. Two witnesses signed after testator, in testator’s presence.
What constitutes “in the testator’s presence” majority rule?
Under the conscious presence, doesn’t need to see the witness sign, just testator needs to be conscious of where they are and what they are doing
What constitutes “in the testator’s presence”Illinois rule?
Witnesses must be in Testator’s line in sight, testator does not have to see witnesses sign, but the witnesses must be within the uninterrupted scope of testator’s vision when they sign. Swivel chair ok
Can an attorney be held liable for the negligent preparation of a will?
Yes, there is no privity of contract defense in IL
Will includes these provisions: “I give $30,000 to my faithful nurse Nell, and the rest of my estate to my sister Sue. I appoint Hobie Gates as executor” Nell and Hobie are the attesting witnesses to the will. Can the will be admitted to probate when Nell is both a beneficiary and attesting witness?
Yes
Will an interested witness situation ever affects validity of the will?
No, may effects the legacy though
When won’t the beneficiary-witness lose its legacy?
- If there are two other disinterested witnesses OR
2. You’re an heir anyway -> Whichever is least rule
What happens if there’s a witness-beneficiary and no disinterested witnesses? (The whichever is least rule?)
witness-beneficiary would take a share of the estate if this will were not admitted to probate, in which case she takes the esser of (i) bequest given by the will or (ii) intestate share (or legacy under an earlier will revoked by this one)
So, if Nell would have been T’s heir if T left no will, Nell would take the lessor of (i) $30,000 bequest or (ii) intestate share, whichever is less. What if Nell was not an heir, would he take the bequest?
No, under IL law Nell wouldn’t get anything b/c he was a beneficiary witness, and no exceptions apply
What about Hobie (the named executor and attesting witness)? Is he entitled to compensation under the Illinois interested witness statute?
No, its denied by statute.
Note: IL no-compensation rule applies ONLY to the executor who signs the will as an attesting witness. Does NOT apply if bank is named executor and bank employee is attesting witness.
So, in this case, not Nell the nurse but Norman Testator’s husband, was one of the attesting witnesses. Does this interested witness take under the will in the majority rule?
Under the Illinois interested witness statute?
Yes, under majority rule Norman can still take. However, under IL interested witness statute the husband’s legacy is void.