Exclusive Rules Of Evidence II Flashcards
What us the rationale of the rule against hearsay?
The lack of reliability of hearsay evidence
4 points
- If the maker is not called as a witness there is no opportunity to cross-examine
- Juries cannot evaluate evidence properly without being able to see the demeanor of the person
- There is danger Witnesses will make mistakes about the meaning or content of statements made by other people
- Undeserved weight may be attributed to evidence which cannot be tested
Section 16(1) Evidence Act 2006 defines “circumstances”
- The nature of the statements
- the contents of the statement
- circumstances of making the statement
- circumstances of the veracity of the person
- circumstances of the accuracy of the observation of the person
Section 16(2)
Unavailable as a witness if the person
(a) is dead
(b) is outside New Zealand and not practical to be a witness
(c) unfit because of age or physical or mental condition
(d) cannot be identified or found
(e) is not compellable
Sec 23 - The general exclusionary rule
Why is opinion evidence generally excluded?
- Where a witness offers a bare opinion, it holds little probative weight
- There is a danger opinion evidence could confuse the tribunal of fact and prolong proceedings
- Opinion evidence maybe based on other evidence which would be inadmissible
In order to be admissible under s24, the statement of opinion must fulfil two basic criteria:
Opinion must be the only way to effectively communicate the information
The opinion must be from something personally perceived by the witness
Section 25
Expert opinion evidence:
May consist of ?
To comply with section 25 must ?
May consist of fact, opinion, or mixture of both.
- be that of an expert
- comprise expert evidence
- offer substantial help in understanding other evidence or ascertaining any fact in the proceeding.
Define expert
A person who has specialised knowledge or skill based on training or study or experience
Opinion evidence from a witness may include
Identity speed emotional state weather age
Section 25(1) provides that expert opinion evidence will be admissible if the fact-finder is “likely to obtain substantial help” from the opinion in:
- Understanding other evidence, or
- In ascertaining any fact that is of consequence in the determination of the proceeding.
OF NOTE: “Substantial help” replaces the two defining common law rules that related to expert opinion evidence and are abolished in s25(2): the common knowledge and ultimate issue rules.