Exclusionary Rule Flashcards

1
Q

Exclusionary rule generally

A

Judge-made doctrine that prohibits introduction of evidence obtained in violation of a defendant’s fourth, fifth, and sixth amendment rights

Unconstitutionally obtained evidence is inadmissible at trial and all fruit of the poisonous tree (evidence obtained from exploitation of the unconstitutionally obtained evidence) must be excluded
- Unless costs of excluding evidence outweigh the deterrent effect exclusion would have on police misconduct

Exceptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Exceptions to fruit of poisonous tree doctrine

A

Fruits derived from statements obtained in violation of Miranda

Evidence obtained from a source independent of the original illegality

Attenuation

Inevitable discovery

Violations of knock and announce rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Attenuation - exception

A

Evidence will be admissible - exception to the fruit of poisonous tree

Evidence for which the connection between the unconstitutional police conduct and the evidence is remote or has been interrupted by some intervening circumstance, so that the causal link between misconduct and evidence is broken

Considers whether the misconduct was purposeful or flagrant

Includes intervening acts of free will on the part of the defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Inevitable discovery - exception

A

Evidence will be admissible - exception to the fruit of poisonous tree

The prosecution can show that the police would have discovered the evidence whether or not the police acted unconstitutionally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

In-court identification and fruit

A

A defendant may not exclude a witness’s in court identification on the ground that it is the fruit of an unlawful detention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Out of court identifications and fruit

A

Unduly suggestive out-of-court identifications that create a substantial likelihood of misidentification can violate due process

Court will not consider applying the exclusionary rule unless the unnecessarily suggestive circumstances were arranged by the police

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Exclusionary rule to grand juries, civil proceedings, parole, etc

A

Inapplicable to grand juries unless evidence was obtained in violation of the federal wiretapping statute

Inapplicable to parole revocation proceedings, in civil proceedings, or where evidence was obtained contrary only to state law or agency rules

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Police arrest erroneously but in good faith

A

Exclusionary rule does not apply when the police arrest someone erroneously but in good faith thinking that they are acting pursuant to a valid arrest warrant, search warrant, or law

Four exceptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Four exceptions to good faith reliance on defective warrant

A

Affidavit underlying that warrant is so lacking in probable cause that no reasonable police officer would have relied on it

Affidavit underlying the warrant is so lacking in particularity that no reasonable officer would have relied on it

The police or prosecutor lied to or misled the magistrate when seeking the warrant

The magistrate is biased and therefore has wholly abandoned their neutrality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Excluded evidence and impeachment

A

Some illegally obtained evidence may still be used at trial to impeach the defendant’s credibility if they take the stand

Otherwise voluntary confession taken in violation of Miranda is admissible for impeachment

Evidence obtained from an illegal search may be used by prosecution to impeach the defendant’s, but not others’, statements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Harmless error test

A

If illegal evidence is admitted, a resulting conviction should be overturned on appeal unless the government can show beyond reasonable doubt that the error was harmless

Upheld if it would have resulted despite the improper evidence

If judge in grave doubt as to the harm, petition must be granted

This never applies to denial of right to counsel at trial because error is never harmless

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Determining whether to apply exclusionary rule

A

Defendant is entitled to have the admissibility of evidence or a confession decided as a matter of law by a judge out of the hearing of the jury

Gov bears burden of establishing the admissibility by a preponderance of the evidence

Def has right to testify at suppression hearing without their testimony being admitted against them at trial on the issue of guilt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly