Exception: Consent Searches Flashcards

1
Q

Consent Search Requirements

A

Police can conduct a consent search without Probable Cause or a Warrant; no suspicion at all is needed

Police don’t have to specify what they are looking for, state what they expect to find, or explain why they are searching

A person can withdraw consent, and then the search must cease.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Consent Search Scope

A

Scope of search is to be judged by objective standard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Schneckloth v. Bustamonte (1973)

A

RULE: To determine whether a search was voluntary doesn’t require that a person knew of his rights, but whether the totality of the circumstances showed that the person was voluntarily allowing the search
o There must be some affirmative assent

RULE: CONSENT TO A SEARCH IS VALID EVEN IF THE CONSENTER DID NOT KNOW HE COULD REFUSE (impractical to impose on police…)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

United States v. Matlock (1974)

A

RULE: Co-occupants can consent if there’s mutual use and general joint access of the property by the co-occupant and the other persons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Illinois v. Rodriguez (1990)

A

RULE: Warrantless searches of a premises are permitted when police have a reasonable belief that voluntary consent was obtained from a party who possesses common authority over the premises; parent authority is good enough to justify search/objective

CONSENT THAT APPEARS VALID WILL BE DEEMED VALID

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Florida v. Jimeno

A

RULE: scope of consent search is governed by standard of “objective reasonableness” – dispositive question – would reasonable person have understood exchange between officer and suspect—As to entire home/unrestricted or one room/floor?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Randolph

A

RULE: consent by one co-occupant won’t overrule express opposition by the other co-occupant—as long as both of them are physically present at the scene

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Fernandez v. CA

A

Joint access exception: physically present inhabitant express refusal of consent to search is dispositive as to him but ONLY when physically present

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Common Authority

A

RULE: Not tied to property law but tied to mutual use by persons having joint access

• One spouse can’t consent if the other is not there
• A parent can consent to the search of a child’s room
• A landlord can’t consent to the search of a tenant’s home
• A hotel clerk can’t consent to a visitor’s room
One roommate can’t consent to the entire apartment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly