Examples Of SA Questions Flashcards

1
Q

How is knowledge established?

A

An admission
Implications from circumstances surrounding event
Propensity evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Forgery - what must be proved?

A

Document was false

User knew that the Document had been made with knowledge and intent required under S) 256

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What must exist in relation to debt and liability?

A

Must be legally enforceable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When is title obtained

A

When the innocent receiver is given title where the property was obtained by deception but has not been voided by the deceived owner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What must the prosecution prove about the representation?

A

It was false in the material particular
Or
Was reckless as to its falsity
Absolute certainty is not required

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a material particular?

A

An important, essential or relevant detail or item

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sub and obj test for reasonableness

A

Sub - the internal reason why someone did something

Obj - the test of a reasonable person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How is a false representation communicated?

A

Writing
Conduct
Demeanor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define Nature of Belief

A
  1. Belief must be in a proprietary or possessory right in property
    2 Belief must be about rights to the property in relation to which the offence is alleged to have been committed
  2. Belief must be held at time of conduct to constitute an offense
  3. Belief must actually be held by the defendant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

False representation to be proved. Case law Carlos v R

A

Falsity must be proved. In Carlos V R there is more than one representation alleged. Directed that each misrepresentation should be included in a separate account.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Does the deception need to be made by the person?

A

Does not need to be made by the person handing over the property, granting credit, conferring a benefits or suffering a loss provided that the deception was the cause of the relevant conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Hire purchase

A

Where goods are obtained on hire purchase by a false representation the offence committed is deception.
If the offender later sells the goods to another offender commjts theft by conversion. Offender never receives title for goods obtained on hire purchase

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Cameron V R - Recklessness

A

Est if
Defendant recognized that there was a real possibility that his actions would bring about the prescribed result and or
The prescribed circumstances existed and having regard to that risk those actions were unreasonable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is required to be proved causing loss by deception

A

The loss was caused by deception
It was reasonably foreseeable some more than trivial loss would occur.
Need not prove loss was intentionally caused

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Probative value

A

Propensity evidence may only be offered about a defendant if the evidence has a probabtive value in relation to a dispute in the proceedings which outweighs the risk that the evidence may have a unfairly prejudicial effect on defendant. .
Judge must take into account the nature of the issue in dispute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Probabtive value what judge may consider

A

The number of persons making allegations that are the same as or similar to reason perosn is being tried

The acts, omissions events circumstances are unusual

Allegations may be result of suggestibility or collusion

Judge also must consider
Whether evidence will pre dispose the fact finder
Whether the fact finder will tend to give disproportionate weight in reaching a verdict to evidence of other acts or omissions.

Similarities between the acts omissions events circumstances of the evidence and the offence for which person is being tried

Connection in time

Frequency acts etc have occurred