Exam2 Flashcards
The Dental advisor
In vitro studies (biomaterials, microbiology)
clinical marketing studies (restorative materials [placement and long-term]; infection control products; equipment)
Enspire Dental
CERAC AC, E4D Dentist, PlanScan, iTero Imaging System, Lava C.O.S, 3M True Definition Scanner
Apex Dental Milling
Full contour zirconia- anterior and posterior; zirconia framework and copings; pressed lithium disilicate, printed orthodontic and crown/bridge models
Digital Impressions- Factors in selection of digital impression system
Type of restoration (silica based ceramic, zirconia, resin ceramic, metal, provisional, wax pattern) in office milling or milling center, cost of equipment (10,000- 125,000), powder required, ortho and implant integration available, special features
In office scanning and In office milling
CEREC (DENTSPLY/Sirona), APOLLO DI, BLUECAM, OMNICAM, e4d Dentist (Planmeca), PlanScan & PlanMill 40 (Planmeca), TRIOS Pod (3shape), TRIOS color (3shape), Galaxy BioMill (BIOLASE), CS 3500 & 3600 Intraoral Scanner and CS 3000 Mill (Carestream Dental), 3M True Definition Scanner (3M), TS 150 Mill (Glidewell Laboratories), new- 3M Mobile True Definition Scanner, Whip Mix corporation, TRIOS Pod (3Shape), DWX- 50 mill (Roland)
New Intraoral Scanner- 3M True Definition Scanner
Scan and Send- scan the preparation using this device then send the highly accurate scan file through the 3M connection center- a secure cloud based digital hub- to a broad range of open and trusted connections
Open connections- send STL files directly to your lab, export STL files and send to virtually any open CAD/CAM system, provide options for clear aligners and night guards
Trusted connections- in office chairside mills, digital implant workflows, orthodontic appliances, access to digitally produced SLA working models
Ownership of Digital System
65% do not own a system
10% own a digital impression system
25% own a full system with in office mill
In office CAD/CAM- steps
prepare tooth (and soft tissue)- dentist, scan- dentist, design- assistant, mill- assistant, polish- stain and glaze- assistant, seat- dentist
Intra- oral scanning In- office
training requirements
initial scanning and “hole filling”, initial design if available (margin marking), lab script completion, file transfer to laboratory
Desktop scanning in office
Initial requirements
workstation dedicated to software (desktop or laptop); WIFI or LAN network- shielded cable to send files; proper network specs to maintain speed of file transfer and storage of files; stead counter/cabinet to hold weight of scanner
Infection control concerns
Disinfection of wands and keyboards
Plan scan-smart tips, autoclavable covers; ITero and Element: disposable covers, ~2.80 each; CS 3500 and 3600: autoclavable covers; Straumann cares/ DWIOS: disinfection with wipe; Tru Def- reportedly immersable in disinfectant; CEREC- Dry Heat or disinfection with wipe
Available In office Mills
PlanMill 40 (Planmeca), CEREC MCXL (DENTSPLY/Sirona); [best for in office work]
TS-150 (Glidewell), Carestream CS3000
Milling in office initial requirements
workstation dedicated to software (desktop or laptop), WiFi or LAN network- shielded cable to send files; proper network and memory to maintain speed of file transfer and storage of files; steady counter/cabinet to hold weight of mill and footprint; compressed air connection, water connection, distilled water, lubricant specific to mill
Milling in office use and maintenance requirements
Software update applied, bur life and changes, chuck maintenance, filter changes for compressor, cleaning spindle and unit, lubricant specific to mill
milling in office training requirements
Operation and maintenance of mill and furnace, file acquisition and initial design (margin marking), restoration design, material selection and milling, firing, staining, and glazing
Maintaining and Troubleshooting- what if something doesn’t scan or mill as expected
Help lines, dial- in support, reviewing maintenance, network issues
selection of restorative materials
Materials, CERAC, PlanMill
Resin ceramic ( yes, yes) Feldspathic porcelain (yes, no) Leucite- reinforced (yes, yes) Lithium disilicate (yes, yes)
CAD/CAM- Lab Work Flow
- Dental office (impressions, model, digital scan)
- Lab (pour model, scan impression, scan model, import scan to design software)
- CAD (Design center or Lab- design restoration)
- CAM ( milling center or Lab- no model, mill restoration, Sinter if necessary, finish and glaze OR print model or wax pattern for investing, pressing or layering PFM or all ceramic restorations. Printed models are also used for orthodontics and prosthodontics appliances)
SLA Die
Dies are fabricated using SLA (3D) printing
SLA (3D) printing
ProJet 1200 (Whip Mix)
Objet Eden 260V (stratasys) Objet30 OrthoDesk (stratasys)
Chairside Oral Scanners- Digital Transfer to Milling/Printing CEnter
Lava Chairside Oral Scanner C.O.S (3M)
iTero Imaging System (Align Technology, Inc)
Milling Center equipment
Scanners, design software, milling machines, and sintering ovens; proprietary and open architecture, 3D printing ( orthodontic and C/B models)
Computer Aided Machining (CAM)
Lava Milling Machine
Milled Zirconia
Lava vs Crystal
Shading
New ceramics are pre-shaded and layered
Sintering
Monoclinic to Tetragonal…stopping short of cubic
Lava COS vs Elastomeric Impressions- Clinical Study
Occlusion
COS, Impression
Perfect: 74, 48%
High: 18%, 46%
Light: 8%, 6%
Lava COS- better results (P <0.05)
Lava COS vs Elastomeric Impressions- Clinical Study
Contacts- Mesial
COS, Impression
Perfect: 62,43%
Tight: 38%, 57%
Lava COS- better results (P <0.05)
Lava COS vs Elastomeric Impressions- Clinical Study
Fit
COS, Impression
Perfect: 92%, 70%
Loose:8%, 30%
Lava COS- better results (P <0.05)
Lava COS vs Elastomeric Impressions- Clinical Study
Clinically Acceptable
COS, Impression
Yes: 95, 89%
No: 5, 11%
Lava COS- better results ( p< 0.05)
Lava COS vs Elastomeric Impressions- Clinical Study
Patient Preference
COS 63%, Impression 8%, No preference 29%
CAD/CAM Ceramics
Factors in Selection of CAD/CAM ceramics
Strength (120 to 1200 MPa),
Esthetics (anterior vs posterior)
patient factors
CAD/ CAM Ceramics Silica based
Feldspathic porcelain (CEREC Blocs), Leucite-reinforced porcelain (IPS Empress CAD), Lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS e.max CAD)
CAD/CAM Ceramics
Flexural Strength of Silica based Ceramics
Feldspathic porcelain (100-120 MPa) , Leucite- reinforced porcelain (120-140 MPa), Lithium disilicate ceramic (375 MPa) (IPS e.max CAD)
CAD/CAM Ceramics
Non silica based CAD/CAM Ceramics
Zirconia (BruxZir Solid Zirconia, BruxZir Anterior, Lava Crowns & Bridges, Lava Plus, NexxZr) Flexural strength (500-1500 MPa), Veneered core and framework and full-contour restorations
What is Zirconia?
Yttrium- stabilized Tetragonal Zirconia (Y-TZP)
> 90% zirconium oxide (ZrO2), stabilized with 3-5.4%, Y2O3, HfO2, Al2O3; small grains with no glassy phase, no silica- special primer for bonding
Benefits of Zirconia Ceramics
Esthetics- excellent, strength- very high, fit- excellent, metal- free, clinical track record (10 year Lava recall, 4 year BruxZir recall, 1 year, NexxZr recall, 1 year BruxZir Anterior recall)
Units of BruxZir vs IPS e.max vs PFR
Material, 2010, 2016
BruxZir, 10,000/mo, 143,000/mo*
IPS e.max, 10,000/mo, 26,000/mo
PFM, 25,000/mo, 19,000/mo
*BruxZir Solid Zirconia 87%
BruxZir Anterior 13%
Lava Recall at 10 years
over 1300 Lava restorations placed since 2003, 1008 restorations recalled, molar crowns, pre-molar crowns, anteriors, bridges, and implant abutments
Resistance to fracture and chipping- fracture rate (6% required), replacement- molar> premolar, chipping rate 4.7%, No fracture/chipping 89%
Zirconia based Restorations
Lava Failures
Undersupported, underfired
BruxZir Solid Zirconia Crowns and Bridges at 4 years
1392 zirconia restorations placed- cemented with self- adhesive and adhesive resin cements; 913 restorations recalled at 4 years; single crown (77%) bridges (16%) and implant crowns (7%)
most restorations had no chipping or fracture, one crown and 2 implants failed; esthetics- excellent great for patients who wanted B1 shade; 5 restorations exhibited slight marginal discoloration, minimal wear on restorations and on opposing dentition, 39 of 913 (2.8%) crowns debonded and were recemented
NexxZr Full contour restorations at 1 year
278 NexxZr T full contour restorations placed; 4% of restorations required minor occlusal adjustment at placement; single crown (88%) bridges (11%) and implant crowns (1%)
NexxZr Full contour restorations at 1 year- rating 97%
179 restorations recalled at one year, one premolar crown exhibited chipping, no restorations required replacement, esthetics- excellent; excellent resistance to marginal discoloration with self adhesive and adhesive resin cements; no wear observed on restorations or on opposing dentition
What’s new
Esthetic Zirconia
BruxZir Anterior (Glidewell Laboratories), Katan UTML (Kuraray Noritake Dental), Lava Plus (3M), Origin Beyond (B&D Dental technologies) Vericore ZR HTX (whip Mix Corporation) * improved translucency but lower flexural strength
What’s new
Multilayered Zirconia
Katana UTML, Kuraray Noritake Dental
35% enamel layer, 15% transition layer 1, 15% transition layer 2, body (dentin) layer 35%
CAD/CAM Ceramics- Translucency Parameter
Zirconia (7.1-7.8) Lithium disilcate (13.8-15.8) Resin ceramic (14.9- 17.7) What value of TP is ideal clinically? Stump shade important
CAD/CAM Ceramics- Surface Roughness (polished)
Zirconia- (0.1-0.15um), lithium disilicate (0.28-0.37um), resin ceramic (0.34-0.46)
BruxZir Anterior Full Contour Restorations at Placement- Rating 98%
306 BruxZir Anterior full-contour restorations placed; 96% of restorations received a rating of 5 at placement. Only 2 restorations were redone because of loose fit and light contacts; single crown (88%), bridges (10%) implant crowns (2%)
BruxZir Anterior Full Contour Restorations at 1 year- Rating 100%
108 restorations were recalled at one year, no restorations exhibited chipping, no restorations required replacement; esthetics- excellent; excellent resistance to marginal discoloration, no wear observed on restorations or on opposing dentition
Pressed Lithium Disilicate (IPS e.max) at 5 years
Over 670 pressed lithium disilicate restorations placed- cemented with self adhesive (87%) and esthetic resin (13%) cements; 381 restorations recalled- 68% at 5 years, 32% less than 5 years; molar crowns (46%) premolar crown (38%), anterior crowns (8%), inlays, onlays, bridges
most restorations had no chipping or fracture, Fracture (required replacement) <2%, chipping 1.5%; esthetics- excellent, 6% of restorations slightly opaque; resistance to marginal discoloration- excellent, 2% slight graying at margins; 12 posterior crowns debonded
What’s new
Milled Resin Ceramics
CeraSmart (GC America),
Enamic (Vident- VITA),
Lava Ultimate (3M)
*higher translucency but lower flexural strength
What’s new Milled Fully Sintered Zirconia
BruxZir Now (Glidewell Laboratories)
limited milling options
What research is needed?
Color and optical properties of monolithic, shaded and layered milled restorations; wear of opposing teeth with full contour zirconia restorations; properties of milled resin ceramics vs zirconia vs silica based ceramics; longevity of lithium disilicate vs zirconia restorations
Mechanical Properties
Reaction to applied force
Elastic modulus, strength (yield, flexural, compressive, tensile) creep, ductility, malleability, hardness, fracture toughness
elastic modulus
“young’s modulus” “modulus of elasticity” a measure of rigidity ; a measure of a material’s ability to resist elastic deformation; a measure of the stiffness of a material; the higher the elastic modulus, the less elastic and more stiff is the material
Yield Strength
The measure of a material’s ability to resist permanent (plastic) deformation; offset is the measure of plastic deformation in test or calculation (can be as little as 0.01%, typical is 0.2%, can be as much as 0.5% or more)
Flexural strength
“Modulus of rupture”; a measure of a material’s ability to resist fracture when a bending force is applied; a measure of both compressive (on top) and tensile (on bottom) strengths
Compressive strength
the measure of a material’s ability to resist being crushed or broken with the application of a pushing force
Tensile strength
The measure of a material’s ability to resist being separated from itself, or broken with the application of a pulling force
Creep
“creep modulus” a measure of the amount of plastic deformation of a material subjected to a compressive force over a given period of time
Elongation percent
The measurement of a material’s ability to be stretched up to its breaking point; the formula (final length - initial length) X100
a measurement of brittleness vs ductility
ductility
a solid material’s ability to be plastically deformed under tensile forces without fracture; a solid material’s ability to be stretched into a wire
malleability
a solid material’s ability to be plastically deformed under compressive forces without fracture; a solid material’s ability to form a thin sheet by hammering or rolling
Gold
Is so ductile that 1 oz can be stretched into a thin wire measuring only 5um in diameter and 50 miles in length; is so malleable that 1 oz can be beaten into a thin, continuous sheet measuring ~100 sq. ft.
Hardness
The measure of a solid material’s ability to resist plastic deformation on its surface when a compressive force is applied
fracture toughness
the measure of a material’s ability to resist fracture in the presence of an existing crack
Physical properties
“observation” dimensional change, dimensional stability, corrosion resistance, tarnish resistance
Dimensional change
The volumetric change that can occur when the components of a material react to form a product
Dimensional Stability
The volumetric change that can occur in a set material over time
Corrosion
Defined as the progressive destruction of a metal by a chemical or electrochemical reaction
Galvanism is a corrosive process that occurs when an electrical current is generated between dissimilar metals in a solution of electrolytes (such as the mouth)
Tarnish
A thin layer of corrosion that can form on the surface of some metals; usually the result of an oxidation reaction with the metal; a tarnish layer can serve as a protection to the underlying metal (silver used to fight off infection)
Amalgam
An alloy of Hg (mercury) and one or more other metals; produced by mixing liquid Hg with solid particles of an alloy containing predominately Ag, Sn, and Cu;
Zn, In, Pd, and Pt may also be present in small amounts
amalgamation
to blend, unite, combine, mix, merge or make a combination of 2 or more things;
in metallurgy: to mix or alloy with Hg
Trituration
to crush, grind or pound into small particles, to pulverize and comminute thoroughly
Amalgam alloy freshly mixed
Once the amalgam alloy is freshly mixed (triturated or amalgamated) with liquid Hg, it has the plasticity that permits it to be conveniently packed or condensed into a prepared tooth cavity
Amalgam alloy vs dental amalgam
the combination of solid metals vs amalgam alloy mixed with Hg
Alloy is the solid part of amalgam filling- dental amalgam is the finished product
Advantages and Disadvantages of amalgam
relatively easy to place, not overly technique sensitive, relatively long service life, inexpensive relative to other materials
color, patient concerns over reported toxicity, concern about impact of amalgam disposal on wastewater and the environment
History
618- 907- possibly used in the first part of Tang Dynasty in China
1528- reportedly used in Germany
1800s- became the restorative material of choice due to its low cost, ease of application, strength and durability
1895- GV Black formulation published
Circa 1900- first broad based research into dental amalgam (balanced composition)
1962- Dispersalloy introduced (addition of a spherical Ag- Cu eutectic particle to the lathe cut Ag3Snɣ particle)
1972- Tytin introduced (unicompositional spherical particles)
Balanced Composition
Ag3Sn ɣ
small amount of Cu
occasionally Zn; 10-20 year durability
Marginal fracture
also referred to as “crevice corrosion”
likely due to Sn- Hg phase (Sn7-8Hg) ɣ2 [weakest phase in the hardened amalgam]
acceptable characteristic of dental amalgam fillings at the time
Eutectic
From the greek “eutektos” meaning “easily melted”
relating to or denoting a mixture of substances (in fixed proportions that melts and solidifies at a single temperature that is lower than the melting points of the separate constituents or of any other mixture of them
Ag- Cu Eutectic
72% Ag 28% Cu
Eutectic point- low point; Silver and copper alone have higher melting points
Types of Alloy
Low Cu,
Hi Cu
Admixed Regular (different Cu amounts)
Lathe Cut- Low Cu
Spherical- Hi Cu
Admixed Unicompositional
Lathe Cut- Same Cu
Spherical- Same Cu
Unicompositional - spherical
Low Cu
Ag3Sn; Ci (2-8wt%)
irregular in shape- lathe cut
Admixer Regular
Ag3Sn; Cu (2-30wt%) lathe cut
+
Ag3Sn; Cu (20-40 wt%) spherical
Admixed Unicompositional
Ag3Sn; Cu (29-30wt%) lathe cut
+
Ag3Sn; Cu (29-30wt%) spherical
ex. dispersilode is this
Unicompositional
Ag3Sn; Cu 13-20wt%) spherical
Elemental Composition of Alloy
Ag- 40-60% (increase strength)
Sn- 26-30% (increase regulates expansion and setting)
Cu- 13-30% strength and hardness decrease corrosion and creep
Zn <0.01% (Zn free) during manufacture; prevents oxidation
In- 0-5% increase strength, decrease creep
Pd 0-1% decreases tarnish and corrosion
Pt 0-1% increases tensile and compressive strength
Why Zn
Included to help produce clean, sound ingots from which the lathe cut particles are made
>0.01% can’t be classified as Zn free
Why is Zn bad? When moisture contamination occurs during amalgam placement, Zn will cause delayed expansion of the set amalgam
Metallic Phases in Alloy
Ag3Sn (ɣ)
Cu3Sn (ɛ) [small amounts]
Cu6Sn5 (ƞ’) [small amounts]
Ag4Sn (β)
Ag-Cu (eutectic)
Amount of liquid Hg
The amount of liquid Hg used to amalgamate the alloy particles is not sufficient to react with the particles completely
more Hg is required to react with lathe cut alloy because of the increased surface area of the irregular, lathe cut shape
Low Cu Reaction
Ag3Sn +Hg –> Ag2Hg3 + Sn7-8Hg + (unreacted) Ag3Sn
Composition of Set Low- Cu Amalgam
Ag3Sn (ɣ) (27-35vol%)
Ag2Hg3 (ɣ1) (54-56vol%)
Sn7-8Hg (ɣ2) (11-13vol%) [weakest of all phases]
Cu6Sn5 (ƞ’) (eta prime) (2-5vol%)
Admixed High Cu Reaction
Ag3Sn + Ag-Cu +Hg –> Ag2Hg3 + Cu6Sn5 + (unreacted) Ag3Sn + (unreacted) Ag-Cu
Composition of Set Admixed High- Cu Amalgam
Ag2Hg3 (ɣ1)
Cu6Sn5 (ƞ’)
Ag3Sn (ɣ)
Ag-Cu eutectic
Unicompositional High Cu Reaction
[Ag3Sn + Cu3Sn] + Hg
—> Ag2Hg3 + Cu6Sn5 + (unreacted)[Ag3Sn + Cu3Sn]
Components of Set Unicompositional High- Cu Amalgam
Ag2Hg3 (ɣ1)
Cu6Sn5 (ƞ’)
Ag3Sn (ɣ)
Cu3Sn (ɛ)
Adding Ag-Cu eutectic to alloy
By adding the Ag- Cu eutectic to the alloy, the formation of the Sn7-8Hg phase was replaced by the Cu6Sn5 phase. This created a harder, more corrosion resistant amalgam
Lathe Cut and/or Admixed Alloys
vs Spherical Alloys
More condensable, easier to establish proximal contacts, less post operative senitivity
vs
better early strength, smoother surface, more easily adapted around retentive pins, requires less Hg
When amalgam achieves strength
Most amalgams will achieve 40-60% strength within 1 hour
Most amalgams will achieve 100% strength by hour 24
Mechanical and Physical Properties of Dental Amalgam
Mechanical (compressive strength, tensile strength, elastic modulus)
Physical ( dimensional change, dimensional stability, corrosion resistance, tarnish resistance)
High Cu Compressive Strength
1 hour (118 to 292 MPa) 7 days (387 to 516 MPa)
High Cu Tensile Strength
15 min (3.8- 8.1 Mpa) 7 days- (43 to 56 MPa)
Elastic Modulus Comparison
Amalgam (40-60 GPa) Composite Resin (5-20 GPa)
Amalgam Creep
The “Creep Test” 7 day set amalgam cylinder, 37C, 36 MPa Compressive force, 104 hours, measured by the shortening of the specimen, ADA/FDI acceptable limit (1%), 0.05-0.45% is standard for Hi Cu Am; >1% creep indicates Sn7-8Hg is in the mix
High Cu Dimensional Change
Change in length of 8mm cylinder between 5 min and 24 hours after trituration; -1.9 to -8.8 um/cm of length (shrinkage); less shrinkage with admixed lathe cut alloys, more shrinkage with unicompositional spherical alloys –> increased PO sensitivity
bonding agents –> decreased PO sensitivity
bonding of amalgam
(4-methacryloyloxyethy trimellitate anhydride)
4META is most successful (for amalgam); 10 MPa shear bond strength to dentin; no true chemical adhesion, bond is produced by commingling of bonding agent with amalgam at interface; fracture resistance of bonded MOD amalgam is equal to that of bonded MOD composite resin and more than twice that of un-bonded MOD amalgam
Dimensional Stability; delayed expansion in Zn containing alloys
Delayed expansion in Zn containing alloys resulting from moisture contamination; this contamination can occur anytime during mixing/ condensing; expansion begins 3-5 days after placement and may continue for months; can exceed 400 um/cm (4%)
caused by the electrolysis of water by Zn which releases ZnO and H2 gas; H2 collects within the mass of the restoration, increasing internal pressure enough to cause the amalgam to creep and expand; can cause pain, typically 10-12 days after placement
High Cu Corrosion
Corrosion can occur on or within the amalgam through the interaction of dissimilar metals; corrosion can lead to increased porosity, reduced marginal integrity, loss of strength and the release of metallic products into the oral environment ; high Cu amalgam restorations are cathodic with respect to other metals within the mouth, such as Ay alloy; Galvanism can occur between these metals (a short term battery effect can be created; long term clinical significance is unknown); the accumulation of corrosion products in the micro-gap at the margin decreases microleakage over time ; consequently, post operative sensitivity can be more prolonged with high Cu amalgams
Corrosion Resistance
Ag2Hg3 (ɣ1) Ag3Sn (ɣ) Cu3Sn (ɛ) Cu6Sn5 (ƞ’) Sn7-8Hg (ɣ2)
(as go down, decrease corrosion resistance)