Exam Two Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Self-presentation

A

the process through which we try to control impressions people form of us; also known as impression management. Focuses solely on the self and very narrow in scope; impression management is broader category looking at other social partners’ factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

o Examples of when we’re concerned with self-presentation

A
	Applying for a job
	Meeting roommates’ parents
	Social media
	First date
	Meeting
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

o Examples of when we’re NOT concerned with self-presentation

A

 At home with family
 When with those close to us
 While alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

o Can come across as manipulative while social psychologists think it’s a matter of selective attention?

A

 We normally focus impression management on playing up our positives and playing down our negatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

• Why do we self-present?

A

o To obtain desirable outcomes and resources
o To “construct” a self-image
 Based upon how others view us
o To facilitate smooth social interactions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

• Dramaturgical perspective

A

view that self-presentation is seen as theater play with roles, props, audience, actors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

• When do we self-present?

A

o When others control a desired outcome
o When the goal is important
o When observers hold undesired images of us
o When we think others are pay attention to us

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

 Spotlight effect

A

people think others pay more attention to them than they actually do
• Example – Barry Manilow study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Barry Manilow study

A

o This study tested the spotlight effect by dividing college students into “observers” and “targets” groups
o In the observer group, people were asked to sit on one side of the table next to each other filling out a survey while the targets were told to enter the room wearing an “uncool” Barry Manilow t-shirt
o The targets were then asked to leave the room soon after being it in and then asked how many of the other in the previous room would remember their Barry Manilow t-shirt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

• public self-consciousness

A

individual personality variable that reflects their public persona
o can be induced by environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

o objectification theory

A

through American society, women adopt the role of observers perspective of physical selves  self-objectification
 some situations might amplify this to increase anxiety
 example – men and women clothing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

• Self-monitoring

A

reflects our concern of our public persona and changing that perception in different situations
o high self-monitoring = “social chameleons”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

o Social anxiety

A

fear of self-presentation failure
 Occurs when people have desire to convey persona and feel like they’re failing to do so
 Correlated with self-presentation but distinctive from it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

• Goals of self-presentation

A
o	Appearing likeable: ingratiation
	Ingratiation – trying to get others to like us
	Expressing liking for others
•	People like others who like them
	Liking is remarkably powerful
	Highlight similarities but do NOT create them
•	we like people similar to us
o	Appearing competent
o	Conveying high status and power
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

 Ingratiation

A
we want others to like us
•	Strategies 
o	Expressing liking for others
o	Highlight similarities
o	Make ourselves physically attractive
	More likely to be elected to office, more likely to serve less time in jail, more liked in general
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

• The multiple audience problem

A
when worlds colliding together; we went to seem likeable simultaneously by two different audiences 
o	Can create anxiety
o	How to solve it 
	Choosing one audience over the other
	Moderating your “multiple selves”
	Avoiding
17
Q

 Self-promotion

A
we want others to see as competent
•	Strategies
o	Stage performance
	Create opportunities to show competence
o	Verbal claims of own competence
	Conflicts with ingratiation to appear modest
	Tougher for women
	Or let others do it for you
o	Display trappings of competence
	Props used to show competence
•	To seem smart, you might put a lot of books on shelves
o	Make excuses for poor performance
	Before or after the event in question
18
Q

o Self-handicapping

A

you’re putting obstacles in your own path
 Drugs, alcohol, procrastination
 Ready-made excuses

19
Q

 Intimidation

A

we want others to see us as having status and power
 Encourage people to do things for us and listen to us
 Strategies
• Use symbols of status and power
o Diplomas, houses, cars
• Conspicuous consumption
o Buying cars, which zip code is associated with you (90210)
o Potlatch – in some countries, when men have too much power/stuff of power, they’ll either give it away or burn it to show their high status
o Engagement rings – “what do her diamonds say about you?”
o Associate with successful others
 BIRGing – basking in reflected glory
 CORFing – cutting off reflected failure
o Dominant body language
 Taking up space with your body
 Study shown that when people are forced to stand in a “power position” before an interview, they’ll be more likely to get the job due to showing power, authority, status

20
Q

Holtzman and Strube (2012)

o Dark Triad study

A

 Narcissism: grandiose view of self
 Psychopathy: lack of remorse; impulsive
 Machiavellianism: manipulating people to get what you want
 All three traits focus on manipulating people for one’s own benefit

21
Q

Holtzman and Strube (2012)

o Research question:

A

are people with high dark triad traits especially good at effective adornment?

22
Q

Holtzman and Strube (2012)

o Methodology

A

looked at unadorned attractiveness vs. effective adornment
 Unadorned attractiveness: true, more stable form of attractiveness
 Effective adornment: things people do to appear more attractive
 Research participants posed for 2 pictures
• First was exactly as they came in (effective adornment)
• Second was without makeup, jewelry, hair pulled back, wearing a sweatshirt and sweatpants (unadorned attractiveness)
 Then took a self-measurement test assessing dark triad traits
 Then got close others to rate participants on dark triad traits
 Random group rated the attractiveness of the two pictures

23
Q

Holtzman and Strube (2012)

o Findings

A

positive correlation between dark triadness and effective adornment; people who score higher on dark triadness are more likely to do things to show self-presentation of attractiveness

24
Q

Personal ads study

A

o Archival study that looked at data collected of personal ads in northern and southern in United States to see how people presented themselves based upon where they were from as well as to see if they sought out those same characteristics with partners

25
Q

• Persuasion

A

o There are many ways in which people try to persuade us
o Change in private (personal to oneself; internal) attitude or belief resulting from receipt of a message
o If they shift your opinion, they shift your behaviors
o Some attitudes are harder to change
 Moral attitudes deeply embedded within us are hard to change; they make up who we are

26
Q

o How do we measure attitudes?

A

 Self-reports
 Covert ways
• Implicit association tasks
o Asks about social prejudices in very discrete ways
 Behavior
• Littering behavior of candidates for political races show that the pictures of those seen more in the trash or crumpled up were less likely to win elections

27
Q

o Direct causes of persuasion

 Dual process models

A
  • Elaboration likelihood model

* Heuristic systematic model

28
Q

o Direct causes of persuasion

 Two different paths to persuasion

A

• We change by deep and careful processing
o Called the central route in the elaboration model and systematic route in the heuristic model
o Focused on quality; rational and logical thinking
o These ads are seen as boring and informational
o Yield longer-lasting attitude change
o Cognitive task
o Need both motivation and ability
• We process superficially
o Peripheral route in elaboration model and heuristic route in heuristic model
o Focused on emotions and surface level considerations
o Cues that indicate to change reasoning
 Multiple arguments
 Attractive ads
o Ads are more attention-grabbing
o Sex sells

29
Q

o When do we allow ourselves to be persuaded?

A

 When new attitude seems more correct (goal of accuracy)
• To hold accurate view of the world
o How can we be accurate?
 Use careful, deep processing of relevant messages
 When we can’t use deep processing, use heuristics/shortcuts of accuracy:
• Use credibility of communicator
o Credibility = accuracy
o Components:
 Expertise and trustworthiness
o “if the trustworthy expert’s saying it, it must be correct”
• Use others’ responses as cue to accurate attitude
o More consensus = higher persuasion
o “if others think it, it must be correct”
 When new attitude enables consistency
 When new attitude enables gaining social acceptance