Exam Revision Flashcards
Define Reporting Entity
All entities (including economic entities) in which it would be reasonable to expect the existence of users dependent on general purpose financial reports for information about that entity. This information will be useful to them for making and evaluating decisions about the allocation of scarce resources. Reporting entities shall prepare general purpose financial reports.
Identify the users with the power to demand SPECIAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Bank – Shareholders - Employees
Identify the users that can only rely on GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Suppliers – Trade creditors
Determine whether Seaside Ltd is a small proprietary company under the ASIC Corporations Act 2001.
TEST: (needs to meet 2 of these)
- Its gross operating revenue is less than $25 million
- Its gross assets are less than $12.5 million
- It has fewer than 50 employees
As Seaside’s accountant, advise the company about its possibilities to prepare GENERAL purpose financial statements in compliance to AASB, and/or SPECIAL purpose financial statements.
When there is a conflict between SAC1 and the Corporations Act 2001, the requirements in Corporations Act supersedes. Hence in this scenario, Seaside Ltd is not required to prepare general purpose financial reports. The main disadvantage of the Corporations Act 2001 is that in some cases, it does not serve the demands of financial users as demonstrated in this case. However, the advantage of the Corporations Act 2001 requirement is that it removes the subjectivity
in the definition of a reporting entity.
Recoverable amount
Recoverable amount is the remaining future economic benefit. Calculated as the higher between net selling price and value in use.
Impairment loss entry
DR Impairment Loss
CR Accumulated Impairment Loss
Loss on Revaluation Entry
DR Loss on revaluation
CR Land
Reversal of Revaluation decrement entry
DR Land
CR Gain on revaluation
What do you do to accumulated depreciation before recording a revaluation
Remove it!!
What happens when you revalue above cost price
Use a revaluation surplus entry
c) Joy Ltd also consulted the accounting firm to be advised on the possibility to carry the land at fair value, instead of at cost, from the next financial year. After carrying out some research, you know that the fair value of the land at the 30 June 2016 is $2,600,000 (Cost price is 2000000) and the land is located in a fast-developing area where the land prices are expected to increase in the next few years. Furthermore, you also know that the main debt holder of Joy Ltd — as part of its due diligence – reviews – the company’s solvency as measured by the debt-to-assets ratio. In consideration of such circumstances, advise Joy Ltd about the implications of carrying land at fair value instead of at cost. Provide reasons for your answer.
The company could consider the change to fair value, as at the moment the cost model seems to underestimate the actual value of the land. In consideration of the due diligence performed by the bank on the debt-asset ratio, it is probably more convenient for the company to move to fair value, because, as it is forecasted a further increase of prices, the debt-asset ratio will progressively improve, giving the company also the possibility to obtain even more fund or not breaching any agreement with the debt holder with respect of its solvency. The profit won’t be penalised, as land is not depreciated and therefore, the increase in value after revaluation would not lead to an increase of depreciation expenses.
Example of a development costs entry
DR Development Costs (New product) 90,000
CR Sampling and testing costs 90,000
Is there goodwill test (when acquiring a business)
Cost of Acquisition > FV of net Assets
Goodwill calculation
CoA – FV of Net Assets
Amortisation of development expense entry
Dr Development expense
Cr Accumulated amort. deferred development costs
Bond Ltd is planning to expand the business and to make big investments in the next year, therefore on 1 July 2016:
a) Purchases governmental bonds for a price of $575,000 (face value $500,000 and 10% interest rate);
b) issues to the public 5 years bonds for $500,000 which pay interests every 6 months at 10% interest rate;
c) purchases the 15% of the shares of Candy Ltd for $80,000, planning to acquire in the future its entire share capital;
d) obtain a loan from the Commonwealth Bank for $600,000, at 10% interest rate.
REQUIRED:
1) For each transaction indicate whether it gives rise to financial assets, financial liabilities or equity instruments for Bond Ltd.
a) Financial assets
b) Financial Liabilities
c) Financial assets
d) Financial liabilities
2) Explain how a financial asset can be measured, making a distinction between the initial measurement and the subsequent measurement.
Initial measurement at fair value +/- transaction costs
Subsequent measurement at amortised cost, or fair value through P/L or fair value through OCI
As stated above, among the other transactions, on 1 July 2016 Bond has purchased for a price of $575,000 some governmental bonds that have a face value of $500,000 and pay annual interests at 10% interest rate on 30 June each year and pay back the principal on the 5th year.
You also know that Bond normally purchases this sort of instruments with the aim to collect the contractual cash flows.
REQUIRED
1) Bond is applying the amortised cost for the subsequent measurement of the instrument. Is this the correct treatment according to AASB 9 Financial Instrument? Justify your answer.
Yes the treatment is correct, because Bond holds the instruments to benefit from the contractual cash flows (business model test) and the instrument is providing contractual cash flows at established dates (contractual cash flows test).
Cash flows of a bond
1st: Outflow of the payment
2nd,3rd etc: Inflow of interest payments
Last: Inflow of interest payment and face value
3) How would you calculate the effective interest rate paid by the bonds, based on the cash-outflows and inflows of the bonds (provide formula)?
27/5/19
I wanted to add a note here but I really didn’t know what to say. I guess I could tell you that I ordered LA Noire for the 3rd time, this time for switch and I ordered a Superman necklace.
Bond and bond interest entries
1 July 2016
DR Governmental bonds (fin assets) 575,000
CR Cash 575,000
30 June 2017
DR Cash 50,000
CR Interest revenue 36,801.14
CR Governmental Bond 13,198.86
b) Determine whether Midget Ltd can measure the government bonds at amortised cost.
Midget Ltd can use amortised cost as the basis for measuring government bonds as it meets the conditions of both Business model and Contractual Cash flow characteristics:
- Business model: the government bonds are held within a business model whose objective is to hold them in order to collect contractual cash flows; and
- Contractual cash flows characteristics: the contractual terms of the government bonds give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding.
Bond final journal entry
Dr Cash 200 000
Cr Investment in corporate bonds 75 471
Cr Interest income 124 529
Dr Cash 2 000 000
Cr Investment in corporate bonds 2 000 000
How do you calculate lease liability
Present value, lease payments + present value of residual
Leased asset =
Right to use asset =
lease liability + initial direct costs incurred to enter into the lease agreement (includes any lease payments made on commencement date)
c) Provide the journal entries of Sandrigham Ltd to record the commencement of the lease agreement on 1 July 2018.
DR Leased equipment 95,961.90
CR Cash 10,000
CR Lease liability 85,961.90
d) Provide the journal entries of Sandrigham Ltd to record the first interest payment on 30 June 2019
DR Interest expense 6,017.33
DR Lease Liability 15,982.67
CR Cash 22,000
3) Illustrate two (2) reasons why the previous accounting standard for leases (AASB117) was criticised and required changes.
The previous standard was complicated and difficult in the application due to the distinction between operating and finance leases
The previous standard was excluding some leases that, therefore, were not represented in the report. This approach was creating a reduction in disclosure and less information was provided to investors about company’s liabilities.