Exam Revision Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Gross negligence manslaughter - R v Rose

A
  1. D owed a DOC
  2. D negligently breached it
  3. It was reasonably foreseeable
  4. The breach caused death
  5. Breach was so bad it amounted to gross negligence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

U and D act manslaughter

A
  1. Unlawful act
  2. Was dangerous
  3. That act caused the death of the victim - AG’s ref 3
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

An unlawful act that a reasonable person would think would risk some harm, albeit not serious harm

A

Church

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Criticisms of Unlawful and dangerous act manslaughter

A
  1. Offence is too broad
  2. To label a person who envisaged no more than a battery a manslaughterer is disproportionate and unfair
  3. Breaches principle of correspondence
  4. An extreme form of constructive liability (grossly exaggerates the amount of culpability)
  5. Attributes too much weight to chance of whether someone commits a battery and faces 6 months or life imprisonment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Peter Sparks argument

A

The defence of diminished responsibility is flawed. D’s mental abnormality ahould be a complete defence if it is the reason they killed or no defence at all if they would’ve killed anyway.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Loss of control - coroners and justice act 2009 s54

A
  1. D lost self control
  2. Caused by a qualifying trigger of fear of serious violence, things done or said of grave character creating a justifiable sense of being wronged.
  3. A person of D’s age or sex with a normal degree of tolerance and self restraint would have reacted the same in D’s circumstances
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

If D acts out of a desire for revenge the defence will fail

A

Loss of control - s54 c&j 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Slow burn anger response

A

Ahluwalia - loss of control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sexual Infidelity cannot be a thing done or said in loss of control

A

S55(6) c&j 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The loss of control need not be sudden

A

S54(2) c&j 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Baker and Zhao argument

A

Sexual infidelity should not be considered at all in loss of control not even as context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Andrew Ashworth argument

A

The ladder principle demands the proportionate wrongfulness of the offence should be pointed out by the label attatched to that offence. Accurate labelling promotes transparency.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Law commission consultation paper 2005

A

Proposed separating murder into 2 degrees. 1st (intention to kill) and 2nd (intention to do gbh)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Lord Steyn in Powell

A

Including intention to do gbh in murder turns it into a constructive crime. A person who only intended gbh is not ‘in truth’ a murderer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Mandatory life sentence criticism

A
  1. Different murders have different degrees of culpability
  2. Intention to cause gbh does not seem fair to always be a life sentence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Indirect intent - Woolin

A

Virtually certain and D knew it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Intention to do GBH

A

Smith

18
Q

Unlawful killing if a human being under the kings peace with malice aforethought in any country of the realm

A

Sir Edward Coke

19
Q

Death occurs at brain death

A

Malcherek

20
Q

Killing is not unlawful if it was done in self defence

A

Beckford

21
Q

Diminished Responsibility c&j act 2009 s52

A
  1. Abnormality of mental function
  2. From a recognised medical condition
  3. Substantially impaired D’s ability to understand their conduct, form a rational judgement and excercise self control
  4. Provides an explanation for the killing
22
Q

Voluntary acute intoxication is not capable of beong relied on for diminished responsibility

A

R v Dowds

23
Q

Self defence is a common law defence

A

Duffy

24
Q

Self defence covers unjustified attacks/threats to oneself or others

A

Williams Gladstone

25
Q

The Imminence requirement of self defence is gendered

A

Protects men in one time adversarial encounters more than women

26
Q

Law commission 2004 recommendation on self defence

A

It is insufficient to weigh the weapons used in each side; sometimes there is an imbalance in size and strength

27
Q

Celia Wells

A

Behind the defence of self defence is the stereotype of one to one, man to man violence

28
Q

Assault

A

D intentionally or recklessly causes V to apprehend imminent and unlawful force

29
Q

Assault can be done by gestures, word, silence

A

Ireland v Burstow

30
Q

Battery

A

The intentional or reckless infliction of unlawful force

31
Q

S47 assault occasioning abh

A

There must be an assault or battery which occassions abh

32
Q

Occasions = causes

A

Roberts

33
Q

Actual bodily harm = any hurt or injury which interferes with health or comfort

A

Donovan, Miller

34
Q

Section 20, GBH

A

D must unlawfully wound or inflict GBH

35
Q

Gbh = very serious harm

A

DPP v Smith

36
Q

Maliciously = intentionally or recklessly

A

Cunningham

37
Q

Herrings argument on rape

A

A man who has sexual intercourse with another knowing that that person would not be agreeing if they knew the truth is using that person for his own ends. It is the “sheer use of another person”. It should be rape”.

38
Q

Gross’ view on rape

A

“the criminal law cannot be used to teach moral lessons or to raise the moral consciousness of those whose views may be in need of moral uplift”.

39
Q

Sharpe’s view on gender deception

A

non-disclosure of gender is not deceptive; doesn’t think the harm or offence suffered warrants criminalisation; and Sharpe that gender history ought not to be viewed as a material fact serving to vitiate consent

40
Q

Edwards argument

A

Women who use weapons do so to arm themselves against disproportionate male strength