Exam Review Flashcards
Unwritten law that is based on custom and general principles
common law
federalism?
tension between the state and federal government
The difference between liability in
Contracts and Torts ?
_____________Tort Liability_______Contract Liability
Pt’s covered ______All___________only in contract
Timing _________All future______fut pt not guaranteed
Physicians ________All___________only in contract
Both are categories under Civil Law
The difference between
Government and Non-Government Contracts
?
Enabling statutes – gives Government a lot of flexibility
Administrative law - Federal Acquisition Regulation System (FAR)
Prescriptive statutes: Favoring
- Small business
-Veterans
-Depressed areas
Much of contract law is a matter of common law; this is not as true in the area of government contracts.
Commerical Contracts (non-government)
- Governed by State Law
- Applies local version of Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)
- FAR does not apply
- Contract changes must be unanimously approved
- No termination for convenience
Set forth general propositions of law that courts apply to specific situations
Statute
Used to forbid a certain act, direct a certain act, make a declaration, or set forth governmental mechanisms to aid society
Statute
Used to forbid a certain act, direct a certain act, make a declaration, or set forth governmental mechanisms to aid society
Statute
Ethics in Government Act Federal Tort Claims Act Military Claims Act Foreign Claims Act Gonzalez Act Uniform Code of Military Justice Patient Self-Determination Act Statutes of Limitation
Examples of Statutory Law
Unwritten law that is based on custom and general principles
Common Law
Embodied in case law
Common Law
Serves as precedent for similar situations
Common Law
Is applied to situations not covered by statute
Common Law
Developed by judges and courts
Common Law
Developed by judges and courts
Common Law
Feres v. United States Roe v. Wade Maher v. Roe United States v. Karl Brandt Moore v. Regents Univ. of California Parker v. Brown
Examples of Common Law
Case Law
Feres v. United States Roe v. Wade Maher v. Roe United States v. Karl Brandt Moore v. Regents Univ. of California Parker v. Brown
Examples of Common Law
Case Law
The body of law concerning with the establishment and operation of government agencies
Administrative Law
Defines the duties, rules, and powers of government administrative agencies
Administrative Law
Establishes the legal relationships between agencies, other government bodies, and the public at large
Administrative Law
Establishes the legal relationships between agencies, other government bodies, and the public at large
Administrative Law
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) regulations
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations
Department of Defense (DoD) regulations
Air Force/Army/Coast Guard/Marine/ Navy regulations
Examples of Administrative Law
Executive Agencies
Contracts
Torts
Family, Property, Bankruptcy, IP, etc.
Civil Law
Society harmed No self-help Restriction on liberty Beyond a reasonable doubt Trial by jury guaranteed
Criminal
Beyond a reasonable doubt
Criminal
Trial by jury guaranteed
Criminal
Individual harmed Self-help permitted Damages By a preponderance of the evidence Limited right to trial by jury
Civil
By a preponderance of the evidence
Civil
Limited right to trial by jury
Civil
A legally binding agreement
Contract
Competent parties Legal subject matter Offer Acceptance Consideration Mutual agreement
Elements of a Contract
Three most potentially important elements of a contract?
Offer
Acceptance
Consideration
Written or Oral
Express or Implied
Types of Contracts
Remedies Sought in Contract
Specific performance
Damages: $$$$
What are the three sources of law?
Statutes
Common Law
Administrative Law
What is the purpose of the Judicial Branch?
settle disputes
Supreme Court and all of the courts undernearth
What is Federalism?
tension between state and federal powers
What is the difference between Criminal Law and Civil Law
CRIMINAL: Society harmed No self-help Restriction on liberty Beyond a reasonable doubt Trial by jury guaranteed
CIVIL: Individual harmed Self-help permitted Damages By a preponderance of the evidence Limited right to trial by jury
What are the elements of a contract?
Competent Parties
Legal Subject Matter
OFFER
ACCEPTANCE
CONSIDERATION
Mutual Agreement
What is specific performance?
Not necessarily monetary, but asking court to require the other party to do what they agreed to in the contract
- an equitable remedy calling for the performance of the act promised in the contract
- the strongest legal or equitable remedy
- courts prefer legal remedies
- equitable remedies are needed in the interest of fairness, protection of a person’s reliance and to avoid injustice and due to the difficulty in measuring legal damages monetarily
What is the primary purpose of damages in a breach of contract action?
Failing to meet the standard.
At this step, the focus on actions, not the outcome.
PURPOSES OF DAMAGE ACTIONS IN TORT
To give compensation, indemnity or restitution for harm
To determine rights
To punish wrongdoers and deter wrongful conduct
To vindicate parties and deter retaliation or violent and unlawful self-help
meeting of the minds means the parties must agree to all the specifics of the contract
mutual agreement
meeting of the minds means the parties must agree to all the specifics of the contract
mutual agreement
one party makes a promise to do or refrain from doing some specified action
offer
the offer was accepted unambiguously
acceptance
something of value is promised in exchange for the specified action
consideration
Understand the three types of Tort Liability
Types of Tort:
Torts of strict liability
Intentional torts
Negligent torts
Distinguish between
Intentional Torts and Negligent Torts
Intentional Torts
Civil Law: Deliberate acts resulting in injury to another
Crimes (Criminal Law): Violations of federal or state criminal law
One act may be both a crime against society and a tort against an individual!!
Example: Surgery Without Informed Consent = Medical Malpractice AND Criminal Act!!
Intentional Tort Elements: Assault Assault Consummated By Battery (Battery) False imprisonment Violation of the right of privacy Abandonment Defamation Intentional infliction of emotional distress Outrage
Negligent Torts:
A breach of duty, other than a contractual duty, which gives rise to a cuase of action for damages
Elements of Negligent Torts:
- Duty
- Negligent Breach
- Causation
- Injury
- Damages
Distinguish between
Damages in Tort and Damages in Contracts
DAMAGES IN TORT v. CONTRACT
TORT:
Calculated to place plaintiff in the same position, had the tort not been committed
The court determines what losses the plaintiff would have avoided had the incident not happened.
CONTRACT:
Calculated to place the plaintiff in the position they would be in had the contract been performed
The court considers the benefits the plaintiff would have gained had the contract been completed
Describe the elements of legally actionable negligence
Negligence - failure to exercise a degree of care that would be taken by another reasonable person in the same circumstances
Individual Negligence Elements
- Duty
- Negligent breach of duty
- Injury
- Causation
Corporate Negligence Elements
- Durty
- Negligent breach of duty
- Injury
- Causation
Apply the defenses in Tort Liability
Elemental Good Samaritan Res judicata Truth Charitable Immunity Sovereign Immunity Assumption of the risk Statute of limitations
Understand the Doctrine of Vicarious Liability
A hospital or doctor can be held vicariously liable for a claim based on the acts of one of its employees
Distinguish between:
Corporate Liability and Corporate Negligence
Liability can fall on the individual or corporation. Corporate liability is either corporate negligence or vicarious liablity
Corporate Negligence:
Failure of a corporation to meet its legal obligations to its clients.
Vicarious Liability:
Sometimes referred to as “imputed liability”
Assigns liability to an individual who did not actually cause the harm, but who has a specific superior legal relationship to the person who did cause the harm
Distinguish between:
Individual Negligence and Corporate Negligence
Individual Negligence:
Failure to exercise the degree of care expected of a person of ordinary prudence in like circumstances in protecting others from a foreseeable and unreasonable risk of harm in a particular situation.
A person has acted negligently if he or she has departed from the conduct expected of a reasonably prudent person acting under similar circumstances
Failure of a corporation to meet its legal obligations to its clients.
Doctrine under which the hospital is liable if it fails to uphold the proper standard of care owed the patient
-Ensure the patient’s safety and well-being while at the hospital
-Responsibilities include the monitoring and supervision of the competence of medical and nursing personnel within the facility; investigating physicians’ credentials, negligent hiring of health care professionals
Distinguish between:
Comparative and Contributory Negligence
(Both Tort Defenses)
Contributory negligence – if negligent conduct on the part of the plaintiff/injured party contributes to the negligence of the defendant in causing the injury or damage, the plaintiff is barred from recovery
Comparative negligence - a partial legal defense that reduces the amount of damages that a plaintiff can recover in a negligence-based claim, based upon the degree to which the plaintiff’s own negligence contributed to cause the injury.
TYPES OF DAMAGES IN TORT:
Compensatory Damages - Intended to restore what a plaintiff has lost as a result of a defendant’s wrongful conduct
Punitive Damages are intended to punish the defendant for their misconduct
- Intended to restore what a plaintiff has lost as a result of a defendant’s wrongful conduct
TYPES OF DAMAGES IN TORT:
Compensatory Damages
In a pure comparative negligence state, what would the dollar amount of the verdict be if a plaintiff were shown to be 15% negligent and his damages were $450,000? ? What if using a modified comparative negligence rule? A contributory negligence rule?
TEST QUESTION FOR SURE!!!
KNOW HOW TO CALCULATE!!!
Pure Comparative Negligence: $382,500
Modified Comparative Negligence: $382,500
Contributory Negligence? $00.00
Tort Defense Review
In a modified comparative negligence state, where the bar to recovery is 50% negligence, what would the dollar amount of the verdict be if a plaintiff were shown to be 51% negligent and damages were $130,000? What if using a pure comparative negligence rule? A contributory negligence rule?
TEST QUESTION FOR SURE!!!
KNOW HOW TO CALCULATE!!!
Pure Comparative Negligence: $63,700
Modified Comparative Negligence: $00.00
Contributory Negligence? $00.00
are intended to punish the defendant for their misconduct
TYPES OF DAMAGES IN TORT:
Punitive Damages
the result of harm incurred due to the actions of another, with no finding of fault by the defendent
Strict Liability Torts
the causing of harm by intentional act, such as intentionally conning someone out of money
Intentional Tort
the causing of harm through some negligent act, such as causing a car accident by running a red light
Negligent Tort
1) _____ the result of harm incurred due to the actions of another, with no finding of fault by the defendent
2) _____ the causing of harm by intentional act, such as intentionally conning someone out of money
3) ______ the causing of harm through some negligent act, such as causing a car accident by running a red light
1) Strict Liability Torts
2) Intentional Tort
3) Negligent Tort
the causing of harm through some negligent act, such as causing a car accident by running a red light
Negligent Tort
1) _____ the result of harm incurred due to the actions of another, with no finding of fault by the defendent
2) _____ the causing of harm by intentional act, such as intentionally conning someone out of money
3) ______ the causing of harm through some negligent act, such as causing a car accident by running a red light
Type of Tort:
1) Strict Liability Torts
2) Intentional Tort
3) Negligent Tort
Tort Defenses:
_______ missing an element such as no duty or no negligent breach
Elemental
Tort Defenses:
which type of tort defense is the following?
Legal protection to people who give reasonable assistance to those who are, or who they believe to be, injured, ill, in peril, or otherwise incapacitated
Law that prevents lawsuits against medical personnel attending to emergency
Good Samaritan
Tort Defenses:
_______ a matter that has been adjudicated by a competent court and may not be pursued further by the same parties
Res judicata
Tort Defenses:
______ If the statement made is true, there can be no claim for libel or slander. In many courts, a “reasonable belief” that the statement is true will also be a successful defense, though other courts will require higher degrees of care
Truth
Tort Defenses:
- is a legal doctrine which holds that a charitable organization is not liable under tort law.
Charitable Immunity
Tort Defenses:
- legal doctrine by which the sovereign or state cannot commit a legal wrong and is immune from civil suit or criminal prosecution.
Sovereign Immunity
Tort Defenses:
________ if negligent conduct on the part of the plaintiff/injured party contributes to the negligence of the defendant in causing the injury or damage, the plaintiff is barred from recovery
Contributory negligence
Tort Defenses:
__________ - a partial legal defense that reduces the amount of damages that a plaintiff can recover in a negligence-based claim, based upon the degree to which the plaintiff’s own negligence contributed to cause the injury.
Comparative negligence
Tort Defenses:
_______ - once a person has knowingly and voluntarily engaged in the risky activity, he cannot sue the host for injuries or damages incurred
Assumption of the risk
Tort Defenses:
________– - law which sets the maximum time that parties have to initiate legal proceedings from the date of an alleged offense or injury
Statute of limitations
Individual vs Corporate Negligence differences
Individual:
A person has acted negligently if he or she has departed from the conduct expected of a reasonably prudent person acting under similar circumstances
Corporate:
Failure of a corporation to meet its legal obligations to its clients.
Doctrine under which the hospital is liable if it fails to uphold the proper standard of care owed the patient
Understand how the Medical Standard of Care applies in Federal Healthcare Settings
Medical Malpractice in the Military Health System; Malpractice System Goals:
Improve Patient care through deterrence
Compensate meritorious claims by injured patients
A potentially compensable event (PCE) is an adverse event that occurs in the delivery of healthcare or services with resulting injury to the patient. It includes any adverse event or outcome, with or without legal fault, in which the patient experiences any unintended or unexpected negative result.
A significantly involved provider (SIP) is an individual who (based on medical record entries) actively delivered care in primary or consultative roles during the episode(s) of care that gave risk to the allegation(s) of malpractice, regardless of the SOC determination.
…. do know that under sovereignty the federal gov’t cannot be sued
Understand the definition of Medical Malpractice
Medical Malpractice refers to negligence by an act, or failure to act, by a doctor or other healthcare provider.
When a medical professional’s treatment fails to meet the accepted standard within the medical community, and it causes injury to, or death of, the patient, it is considered to be malpractice.
– “let the master answer”
Respondeat Superior
Understand the requirement for expert medical testimony in Tort cases.
Res ipsa loquitur - expert NOT required
Rule 702 - Testimony by Expert Witnesses
the patient might have a physician offer Expert Testimony regarding the medication that reasonably prudent physician would have prescribed
– a person who is called upon to testify during a trial due to his knowledge or skills in a field that is relevant to the case
Expert Witness
– “let the master answer”
Legal doctrine in which an employer may be held responsible for the actions of his employees, when the actions are performed “in the course of employment.”
Respondeat Superior
Legally Actionable Negligence
Negligent Torts
Duty
Negligent breach of duty
Injury
Causation
The legal term: “the reasonably prudent person under the circumstances (RPPUTC)”
Not the highest degree of known professional skill, but that which is reasonable or ordinary…
Standard of Care
The legal term: “the reasonably prudent person under the circumstances (RPPUTC)”
Not the highest degree of known professional skill, but that which is reasonable or ordinary…
Standard of Care
The legal term: “the reasonably prudent person under the circumstances (RPPUTC)”
Not the highest degree of known professional skill, but that which is reasonable or ordinary…
Standard of Care
Examples of Negligent Medical Torts
Failure to meet the standard of care:
Failure to consult Failure to refer Failure to obtain informed consent Abandonment Breach of confidentiality
Application of the Standard of Care
_______ - the standard of care to be applied to the professional’s conduct is the reasonable care exercised by similar professionals in the same vicinity and professional community.
________ - requires a doctor to use the degree of skill and care of a reasonably competent practitioner in his field under same or similar circumstances
Locality Rule
National or Professional Rule
The plaintiff’s injury must be of a type that does not ordinarily occur unless someone has been negligent.
Means - - “ The Thing Speaks for Itself “
Laymen would understand
Expert testimony is not required
Res ipsa loquitur
Res ipsa loquitur Examples?
Wrong limb or body part
Wrong patient
Explosion or fire
Foreign body left in patient
Why are employers responsible for their employee conduct?
Respondeat Superior
The Latin term respondeat superior, which means “let the master answer”
Legal doctrine in which an employer may be held responsible for the actions of his employees, when the actions are performed “in the course of employment.”
Vicarious Liability – A hospital or doctor can be held vicariously liable for a claim based on the acts of one of its employees.
How is the standard of care measured in negligence cases?
The legal term: “the reasonably prudent person under the circumstances (RPPUTC)”
Not the highest degree of known professional skill, but that which is reasonable or ordinary…
What is National Standard of Care?
National or Professional Rule - requires a doctor to use the degree of skill and care of a reasonably competent practitioner in his field under same or similar circumstances
Locality Rule - the standard of care to be applied to the professional’s conduct is the reasonable care exercised by similar professionals in the same vicinity and professional community.
National or Professional Rule - requires a doctor to use the degree of skill and care of a reasonably competent practitioner in his field under same or similar circumstances
Failure to meet the standard of care:
Failure to consult Failure to refer Failure to obtain informed consent Abandonment Breach of confidentiality
Name and define the types of damages awardable in Tort cases (two)
Compensatory Damages - Intended to restore what a plaintiff has lost as a result of a defendant’s wrongful conduct (can be compensatory or general)
Punitive Damages are intended to punish the defendant for their misconduct
To give compensation, indemnity or restitution for harm
To determine rights
To punish wrongdoers and deter wrongful conduct
To vindicate parties and deter retaliation or violent and unlawful self-help
PURPOSES OF DAMAGE ACTIONS IN TORT
Describe the two types of compensatory damages:
Special Damages - financial losses directly caused by the defendant’s actions
General Damages – money awarded for things for which the value is more difficult to determine.
Describe the two types of compensatory damages:
Special Damages - financial losses directly caused by the defendant’s actions
General Damages – money awarded for things for which the value is more difficult to determine.
Name the type of damage that cannot be awarded against the United States
punitive damage
SPECIAL DAMAGES (objective factors) ?
financial losses directly caused by the defendant’s actions
Cost of repairs
Loss of earnings
Impairment of earning capacity
Medical expenses
Services in the home
Cost to repair or replace property
Cost of repairs
Loss of earnings
Impairment of earning capacity
Medical expenses
Services in the home
Cost to repair or replace property
SPECIAL DAMAGES (objective factors)
SPECIAL DAMAGES (objective factors) ?
financial losses directly caused by the defendant’s actions
Cost of repairs
Loss of earnings
Impairment of earning capacity
Medical expenses
Services in the home
Cost to repair or replace property
GENERAL DAMAGES (subjective factors)
money awarded for things for which the value is more difficult to determine.
Pain and Suffering Physical impairment Loss of use Visible scarring Loss of enjoyment of life (Hedonic) Mental Anguish
Pain and Suffering Physical impairment Loss of use Visible scarring Loss of enjoyment of life (Hedonic) Mental Anguish
GENERAL DAMAGES (subjective factors)
Pain and Suffering Physical impairment Loss of use Visible scarring Loss of enjoyment of life (Hedonic) Mental Anguish
GENERAL DAMAGES (subjective factors)
can punitive damages be awarded against the US?
NOT A CHANCE!!
______ are damages awarded against a person to punish him for his outrageous conduct and to deter him and others like him from similar conduct in the future.
PUNITIVE DAMAGES
________ = the defendant’s evil motive or his reckless indifference to the rights of others.
Outrageous conduct
Character of defendant’s conduct
Extent and nature of the harm (actual and intended)
the wealth of the defendant.
Considerations for what?
PUNITIVE DAMAGES
Waiver of Sovereign Immunity to permit individuals to sue the U.S. for negligent acts of U.S. government personnel acting within the scope of employment.
Sole Remedy for negligent acts of military health care providers acting within SOLE – suit must be against the U.S., not the individual
Federal Tort Claims Act
APPLIES IN THE FOLLOWING: In-scope negligent torts of agents and employees
In the United States
When the FTCA Applies?
Federal Tort Claims Act
In-scope negligent torts of agents and employees
In the United States
When the FTCA Applies?
Federal Tort Claims Act
In-scope negligent torts of agents and employees
In the United States
Federal Malpractice Claims Process:
Begins with an Administrative Claim
Must state a sum certain
Proper Claimant - public, family members
U.S. Government has 6 months to process claim
If no response or not satisfied with final decision claimant can file suit in Federal
District Court
May only be filed pursuant to the FTCA
If filed against the health care provider – U.S. Government will be substituted (not automatic)
Federal Malpractice Claims Process:
Begins with an Administrative Claim
Must state a sum certain
Proper Claimant - public, family members
U.S. Government has 6 months to process claim
If no response or not satisfied with final decision claimant can file suit in Federal
District Court
May only be filed pursuant to the FTCA
If filed against the health care provider – U.S. Government will be substituted (not automatic)
FTCA RULE S
Two year Statute of Limitations Trial by judge alone Trial in U.S. District Court No limit on damages No punitive damages
Two year Statute of Limitations Trial by judge alone Trial in U.S. District Court No limit on damages No punitive damages
FTCA RULE S
FTCA KEY TERMS
what is a proper claimant?
Civilians
Dependents
Retirees