Exam questions Flashcards

1
Q

A student is calculating the cost of capital of the firm. She is using the book values of debt and
equity from the last available balance sheet to estimate the weights of debt and equity.
Describe why this is wrong.

A

Answer: Financing costs depend on how a firm will look in the future not how it looks currently
on paper. Market values reflect a firm’s true ability to generate future cash flows and hence
service its obligations associated with its financing. Using the historical values of debt and
equity may therefore be misleading in scenarios when a firm’s prospects have changed. The
student should hence use market value weights of debt and equity while computing the cost
of capital.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

You are valuing a company with a changing capital structure using the Free Cash Flow to the
Firm (FCF/WACC) method. The capital structure is expected to become more debt heavy.
Describe the variables that you would need to change and in which direction the change would
be (for example: X will increase).

A

You would need to make the following changes:
‐ The D/V ratio will increase;
‐ The cost of debt will increase as debt becomes more risky;
‐ The beta of equity will increase (which affects the cost of equity)  re-calcualate the
levered equity beta from the unlevered equity beta (or asset beta) with the changed D/E
ratio in each period.
You would not need to change cash flows. FCFF is capital-structure invariant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Imagine two companies that are highly similar in terms of the factors that affect their EV/EBITDA ratio: their cash flows, long-run growth prospects, their riskiness and so on. A hurricane strikes one of the companies, lowering EBITDA and raising reinvestment for the next year – other than that, the damage is temporary and the firm will return to its growth path. Which company should temporarily trade at a higher EV/EBITDA ratio or will they be the same? You don’t need to know or mention any formulas to answer this question; it can be answered purely based on common sense.

A

Answer: The hurricane strike causes temporary damage to the company. This is likely to affect EBITDA, short-run reinvestment and EV and lower all of these three. Crucially however, since we expect the firm to return to its pre-hurricane growth path, the impact on EV should be lower than the impact on EBITDA and long-run reinvestment rates should be the same. After this, it becomes a simple mechanical exercise: EBITDA falls and EV falls, but the fall in current EBITDA will be much larger, so therefore the EV/EBITDA ratio (based on current year EBITDA) of the affected firm
will rise. Once the firm recovers, the two firms should trade at the same ratio.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain the steps and inputs involved in calculating the implied equity risk premium for a stock market index and the assumptions required for the methodology to be valid. You do not need to state assumptions about the investor being diversified etc. Instead, discuss the assumptions underlying the
inputs of the implied ERP model.

A

Answer: The implied ERP is calculated by “reverse-engineering” the valuation of the index by using a DCF. That is, decide on an appropriate forecast horizon, find out expected cash flows from the index (from for instance analyst reports) and the discount rate for each period. The current level of the index is the valuation of the index and you have information on cash flows as well as the risk-free part of the discount rate. If we assume that CAPM is the appropriate risk model, we are left with one unknown – the ERP. We work backwards from the valuation to determine the one missing input into the valuation and hence get a forward-looking measure of risk.

For this to work, we have to assume we are using a similar model the marginal market participant – that is, we have to assume that our choice of forecast horizon is correct and that analyst estimates accurately proxy for the market’s growth expectations and cash flows. We also have to assume that the CAPM is indeed the correct measure of risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

You are an analyst at a hedge fund. Your boss suggests that Fujiba, a Japanese conglomerate with two divisions, computing equipment and nuclear power, would unlock value if it were split into two separate companies (one focusing on computing equipment and the other on nuclear power). Your boss asks you to value the nuclear power operations as a standalone company. How would you estimate the CAPM beta of the nuclear operations? Explain the process step-bystep.
You may assume that the marginal investor in Fujiba is Japanese.

A

Answer: We cannot determine a regression beta since we do not have a price history for the nuclear arm, only for the entire company. Therefore we have to use the bottom-up beta method. The steps involved are:
(i) Determine a group of peer firms (same industry, ideally same country, so nuclear
firms in Japan. You can use nuclear firms in other countries if necessary – the exact
peer specification were not the important thing here).
(ii) Calculate regression betas for these firms for an appropriate time horizon (e.g. daily
data, one year).
(iii) Calculate the asset beta (industry beta) by unlevering these betas – that is, adjust for
the capital structures of the peer firms.
(iv) Take the unlevered beta and re-lever it for the expected capital structure of the
standalone nuclear firm (either from current financial statements if available, though
we do not know the value of equity, or based on some sort of target)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

A student is calculating the return on invested capital (ROIC) of European airline firms and observes that there is a significant decrease in ROIC between 2018 and 2019. However, she does not observe any significant decline in revenues or other costs. Explain to her what might be causing this decline and how she can make the ROIC figures across years comparable.

A

The decline in ROIC is due to the fact that under IFRS operating leases were capitalized starting 2019. This means that lease expenses which were previously classified as operating expenses are no longer treated as such but are capitalized in the balance sheet and recognized as long-term debt on the liabilities side (tangible asset in the asset side). This increases the invested capital, which is the denominator in the ROIC
calculation causing the decline in ROIC in 2019. To make the figures comparable across years, the student should capitalize the operating leases in 2018.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain with the help of a numerical example why a firm’s growth rate in the longrun cannot exceed the growth rate in its industry. For the purposes of illustration you may assume that there are only two firms in the industry.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Consider the argument: “Firm A has a constantly higher net profit margin than Firm B, therefore it should trade at a higher P/E (price-to-earnings) multiple.” Firms A and B are identical in all other ways.
Discuss whether the argument is incorrect and why / why not.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

You are valuing a firm and notice that it trades at a lower P/E (price-to-earnings) multiple than its peer firms. The peer firms are from the same industry and country as the firm you are valuing.
What factors would you need to account for before concluding that the firm is undervalued?

A

Answer: You need to decompose the P/E ratio to examine the drivers of the ratio. In particular, you need to ensure that the peer group has similar growth prospects, similar ROE, similar payout ratios and similar risk before you can conclude anything. You also need to ensure that the peer group have similar accounting standards and reporting horizons.
Additional answers which received points: Ensuring that the firms have similar liquidity and ownership structures (private/public).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Valuation professionals typically use the book value of debt to proxy for the market value of debt when calculating the D/E (debt-to-equity) ratio.
In what kind of firms does this approximation lead to large errors and what could be done to correct for them (assuming a market value of debt is not available)?

A

Answer: The approximation will lead to large errors when the book value of debt differs significantly from the market value of debt. Since it is very unlikely that the market value will be considerably higher than the book value, the most common situation where this might happen is with distressed firms, where the market value is well below the book value. In these
cases, using book D to calculate D/E will lead to the largest errors (please note: partial credit awarded to those who said “when the two are different” – an example, such as distressed firms, is needed for full marks). In order to correct for these errors, some kind of discount must be applied to the book value
of debt (partial credit for noting this). You may for instance look at how the market value of similarly traded debt relative to its book value and apply a similar discount. Alternatively, you could look at yields-to-maturity on similarly rated (but traded) debt and calculate a “market value” of your firm’s debt using this.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

A student is calculating the cost of capital of the firm. She is using the book values of debt and equity from the last available balance sheet to estimate the weights of debt and equity.
Explain to her what is wrong with her approach.

A

Financing costs depend on how a firm will look in the future not how it looks currently on paper. Market values reflect a firm’s true ability to generate future cash flows and hence service its obligations associated with its financing. Using the historical values of debt and equity may therefore be misleading in scenarios when a firm’s prospects have changed. The student should hence use market value weights of debt and equity while computing the cost
of capital.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A student is calculating the implied stable long-run growth rate of a firm by multiplying the expected return on newly invested capital in nominal terms by the expected reinvestment rate in the stable growth phase. Explain to him what is problematic with his reasoning.

A

Answer: The student is ignoring the fact that even in the absence of reinvestments a firm could still grow in nominal terms by indexing up the price of its products by inflation. He would calculate the nominal growth rate to be zero when the firm is not reinvesting into new assets (i.e., reinvestment rate = 0). As a result, the free cash flow in nominal terms will be a constant in the post-projection period (or terminal period), which would then mean that firm value will be decreasing in real terms over time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Suppose the projected long-run growth rate in real GDP is 1.8% while the 30-year real interest rate is 2.10%.
Is this scenario possible? Why or why not? If it is not possible, would the alternate scenario be possible (i.e., the projected real GDP growth rate > long-run real interest rate)? What would the alternative scenario then imply?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

A student is valuing a privately-held firm. He is using the CAPM to calculate the asset beta of the firm’s publicly-traded peers and their average D/E (debt-to-equity) ratio (in market value terms) to calculate its cost of levered cost of equity.
Explain to him why this is not appropriate.

A

Answer: The CAPM assumes that the marginal investor holds a diversified portfiolio and
therefore expects compensation for only non-diversifiable risk, which is captured by the beta
measure of publicly-traded firms. The marginal investor (the owner) in a private firm does not
hold a diversified portfolio and (s)he therefore expects compensation for firm-specific as well
as non-diversifiable risk. The beta estimated based on publicly-listed peers understates the risk and hence the cost of equity of the privately-held firm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Consider a firm owned and managed by an individual owner. Explain why a control premium exists in the context of private-held targets. Suppose the current value of a privately-held firm in the hands of its owner who owns 100% is $1 million and that an outside investor things that with better management the firm would be worth $1.5 million. The current owner is aware of the magnitude of the potential value surplus in the hands of the outside investor. Assume that
the owner sells either 49.9% of the firm or 50.1% of the firm. What is the implicit control premium?

A

Answer: In privately-held firms, the controlling shareholder (i.e., the owner and/or the founder)
is also typically the manager of the firm. If an outside investor wants to increase value by reducing potential mismanagement, (s)he will need to acquire majority ownership. The owner will ask for a premium to give up control which the acquirer or outside investor has to pay a premium to be able to realize the value increase – i.e., control premium.
Control premium = (50.1% * $1.5 M) – (49.9% *$1 M)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain why classifying R&D spending as an operating expense is problematic. What problem does capitalizing R&D expenses solve?

A

If R&D spending is expensed, it impacts the performance measures such ROIC or ROA only in the year when the spending is made but not in future years. By capitalizing R&D, R&D is treated as a capital expense and it shows up on the balance sheet as operating capital. R&D spending made in any given year would therefore impact the performance measures such as ROIC or ROA also in future years until the intangible assets (or R&D assets) are fully amortized. This helps in holding managers accountable for generating returns on the R&D
spending.

17
Q

You are comparing two firms (U and E) from the same industry. Firm U is based in the US (and
reports under the U.S. GAAP) while firm E is based in the NL (and reports under the IFRS). Neither firm spent any money on tangible or intangible investments or R&D in the current year. Their revenues and cost structures are comparable.

Suppose a student calculates the ROIC of both firms without making any adjustments to their respective income statements or balance sheets. Which of the two firms will have a higher return on invested capital (ROIC) in the current year? Why? Which firm’s ROIC is more representative of its actual performance?

A

Answer: The ROIC of firm U will be higher than that of firm E because under US GAAP R&D costs are only expensed and not capitalized. Since R&D costs are not capitalized, firm U’s R&D spending from past years will not have any impact on its balance sheet and hence it will have a lower operating capital and a higher ROIC. The ROIC of firm E is more likely to be representative of actual performance since its development spending (under IFRS) is capitalized, which makes is less likely to be impacted by year-on-year variation in R&D
spending.

18
Q

Which will usually imply a higher valuation if market prices have not moved much – transaction multiples or trading multiples? Explain (briefly) why.

A

Transaction multiples will incorporate a premium for control (or synergies), selection effects and/or winner’s curse, so they will typically be higher conditional on overall market valuations being at the same level.

19
Q

The Dividend Discount Model (DDM) values a firm as the PV of all cash flows the firm pays out to investors. The Free Cash Flows to Equity (FCFE) model instead
values the firm as the PV of all cash flows that the firm could pay to investors. In theory, investors should care about actual cash flows more than about potential cash flows. However, the FCFE model is much more widely used. Give reasons why the FCFE model is preferable to the DDM.

A

In theory, the DDM is more appealing. Investors care about actual cash flows, not potential cash flows. The FCFE however does however work as an equivalent if the firm reinvests the cash at market rates (meaning that investors are indifferent about whether the cash is inside the firm or outside).The main advantage of FCFE though is that it better captures the earnings potential of a firm that does not pay out all its earnings in dividends but can do so in the future
(though DDM can account for this). If the firm is not paying out all earnings in dividends (or is paying more than it can to maintain growth), the FCFE model will
perform better, or at least will be easier to implement than DDM which requires some “compensation” (higher dividends for example) at some uncertain time in the future. FCFE is also better for quantifying reinvestment needs and their relationship with growth rates, though of course the DDM can in theory do all of this as well.

20
Q

You are working as a consultant advising the management of a Germany familyowned
business. The family does not hold a well-diversified portfolio. The business wants to acquire a smaller competitor. Your coworker has valued the target firm and used the CAPM to estimate the discount rate. Explain what is wrong with this and in which direction it likely biases the valuation? The answer should not be a general critique of CAPM but focus on this specific scenario.

A

You do not hold a diversified portfolio. A portfolio with CAPM will assume too small a discount rate, biasing the valuation upwards.

Using CAPM to estimate the discount rate assumes that investors are diversified and only require compensation for systematic risk. In the case of the family-owned business, which is not diversified, CAPM does not account for unsystematic risk, leading to an underestimation of the discount rate. This results in a valuation that is biased upwards, suggesting that the family may overvalue and potentially overpay for the acquisition of the competitor.

21
Q

A common argument for using APV is that DCF with WACC models are unable to account for a changing capital structure. Is this argument correct? Explain
why or why not.

A

It is incorrect. DCF with WACC can account for a changing capital structure, however people often do not incorporate this in practice (and it is difficult because you do not change D/E but also the cost of debt and equity).

22
Q

Firms in financial distress should have a higher cost of equity due to their increased riskiness” Is this statement true, and why or why not?

A

In a CAPM world, financial distress is not a priced risk factor – it is an idiosyncratic risk. Of course, in a multi-factor world, financial distress may have a undiversifiable component (or result in cash flows correlated with a systematic factor), so it could
be priced. However, the firm’s leverage is likely to be higher in financial distress which may affect the cost of equity.

23
Q

Imagine two firms. The firms are identical in all except one way. One of the firms has a higher operating (i.e., EBIT divided by sales) and net margin (i.e, net income divided by sales) than the other. That is, the firms have the same EBIT and net income, but the revenue of one firm is higher than that of the other.
Should one of the firms trade at a higher Price-to-Earnings (P/E) multiple than the other? Why or why not?

A
24
Q

Two companies have the same long-term prospects concerning growth and other factors - they are expected to be similar firms in the long run. One of the companies temporarily stumbles during a new product launch, and profits drop considerably as the company scrambles to fix the error (but this is expected to be short term). Will this company trade at a higher or lower enterprise value to
EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) multiple than its stable peer? Why or why not?

A

The firm that stumbled should trade at a higher EV/EBITDA ratio. It’s EBITDA is temporarily lower but is expected to recover (i.e. have higher growth). There is no need to look at drivers of the multiple here – the intuition for the answer is simple
enough.

25
Q

Imagine two firms. The firms are identical in all except one way. One of the firms has a higher operating (i.e., EBIT divided by sales) and net margin (i.e, net income
divided by sales) than the other. That is, the firms have the same EBIT and net income, but the revenue of one firm is higher than that of the other. Should one of the firms trade at a higher Enterprise value to sales (EV/Sales) multiple than the other? Why or why not?

A
26
Q

How to adjust for value of employee stock options?

A

Typically deducted as an operating expense, while it would be cleaner to undo and value them, this is almost impossible so we leave this.
Value of existing stock options and grants should be deducted from MV of equity. Either by valuing them, or by simply taking the diluted number of shares outstanding to calculate the share price.

27
Q

Why should R&D and operating leases not be expensed for valuation purposes?

A

It understates the amount of capital used and the effects are thus only stated in the year the spending is done. In future years, the firm wont be held accountable for it.

28
Q

What accounting schemes are there for R&D?

A

Under IFRS, research costs are expensed and development costs are capitalized (no adjustments needed).
Under U.S GAAP, R&D costs are expensed and need to be capitalized.

29
Q

What is ronic under in the stable growth phase in perfect competition?

A

Ronic wil equal cost of capital in this scenario.

30
Q

What is a good proxy for the long-run real GDP growth rate?

A

The (real) risk free rate

31
Q

Who’s perspective do we usuallty take in a valuation?

A

The perspective of a marginal risk-averse investor that is wel diversified.
Risk averse: seeks compensation in excess of risk free rate to hold a risky asset
Well diversified: no compensation required for non diversifiable risk

32
Q

What’s the advantage for APV over WACC

A

-DCF with wacc does not reflect changing capital structure in practise
- Works better when a firm is expected to have negative CF for many years
- Works better with limited information
- For high yield firms we should use APV, to properly value the riskiness and gains from the tax shield

33
Q
A
34
Q
A
35
Q
A
36
Q
A