Exam prep Flashcards

1
Q

a. “laying aside His divinity”

A

Ellen White does advocate a concept of kenosis, but only in line with Philippians 2:6-8. In all her writings she only used the phrase: “laying aside His divinity,” once in comparison to the 125 usages of “clothing or veiling His divinity with Humanity.” Thus we should give greater weight to the latter phrase as indicating her clear teaching.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

b. “born without a taint of sin, but came into the world in like manner as the human family”

A

This is a powerful dialectical statement that shows Ellen White’s thinking. It doesn’t speak about deeds but rather a state of being. Christ had no original sin. He had no inner corruption or taint of sin. This is in contrast to humanity. It is important for White to distinguish that Christ was sinless and that humanity is sinful. He was born into humanity, but He was different.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

c. “Christ’s humanity alone could never have endured this test, but his divine power combined with humanity gained on behalf of man an infinite victory.”

A

This was one of the statements in which White presented the antithesis between Christ’s divinity and His humanity. One cannot speak about the one, without the other in order to give her full credit. By just His humanity He would not have been able to have endured the cross. His divinity gave greater capacity for Him to bear the sins of men.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

d. “On all points except sin, divinity was to touch humanity”

A

Ellen White combines the thought of the sinless human nature of Christ with the fact that Christ took man’s fallen nature upon Himself. She states that Christ was not merely sinless in act but in nature. She defines the fallen nature which Christ took upon Himself as being “subject to the infirmities and weaknesses” which face men. Ellen White makes a distinction between “infirmities and weaknesses” on the one hand and sin on the other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

e. “Do not set him before the people as a man with the propensities of sin.”

A

The Baker letter was a letter of council to a minister who preached about the nature of Christ. She stated bluntly to Him that Christ had no propensities to do evil. He was assailed with temptations, but not once did He give in. He was repulsed by sin. There was no taint of sin upon Him.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

With reference to the chapter “Costly Grace” by Dietrich Bonhoeffer, translate the phrase used by Martin Luther: pecca fortiter, sed forties et gaude in Christo. Explain what this phrase means according to Bonhoeffer.

A

It translates as “Sin boldly but believe and rejoice in Christ more boldly” This was not an invitation by Luther to just continue sinning. It is rather a confirmation of man’s sinfulness, and the inability to escape from it. Since we cannot escape this sinful nature, it is important to believe (and rejoice) in grace more boldly that what our sinful character are bold. What he is saying is that, you are a sinner, you cannot change it, accept it, be a sinner, but believe and rejoice that Grace has ultimately saved you from that nature.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

According to Dietrich Bonhoeffer, distinguish between costly grace and cheap grace.

A

Cheap grace would be what the churches proclaim today. It is receiving God’s grace without having to do anything for it. Costly grace requires discipleship. It requires the follower of God to change his/her way or life. Cheap grace is forgiveness without repentance, baptism without church discipline, communion without confession. It is Grace without the cross

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain what Dietrich Bonhoeffer means when he says of Martin Luther: “The renunciation he made when he became a monk was child’s play compared with that which he had to make when he returned to the world.”

A

When Luther became a monk, he gave everything up except his pious self. Meaning that he attempted to make the ultimate sacrifice by giving up the world but in this attempt he failed as he thought it would make him a better Christian. When he returned to the world, he had to give up the pious self, acknowledging that he is nothing better than anybody else. He had to acknowledge that grace doesn’t come as a result of any achievement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Write a brief paragraph describing the content and nature of “the proclamation of the Gospel” according to Wolfhart Pannenberg in “The Gospel.”

A

For Pannenberg the whole story of the Gospel is about reconciliation. Because of sin, there is a need for reconciliation to God. Jesus came to be the Gospel (the reconciliation) and the Apostles then told the story of the Gospel. This Gospel, Good News is the breaking in of the rule of God into the world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What role does the idea of reconciliation play in Wolfhart Pannenberg’s understanding of the Gospel?

A

For Pannenberg the whole story of the Gospel is about reconciliation. Because of sin, there is a need for reconciliation to God. Jesus came to be the Gospel (the reconciliation) and the Apostles then told the story of the Gospel. This Gospel, Good News is the breaking in of the rule of God into the world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Geoffrey Paxton in “The Heart of the Reformation” states that “Rome taught that justification means to make the believer just” while “the Reformers taught that justification is the declaration by God that the believer is just.” Briefly explain the difference between these two understandings of justification by faith.

A

The reformers view is that we are solely pronounced righteous on the merits of Christ alone and in no way in one self. The Roman view is that the believer is not just pronounced righteous but is made righteous, thus receives a righteous heart. This righteousness that he receives makes him acceptable before God, In other words, while the reformers view is that righteousness cannot come from within but only from Christ, the Roman view is that righteousness, once received, come from oneself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Taking your information from the readings by Geoffrey Paxton, write a paragraph explaining the relation of Seventh-day Adventism to the theology of the Reformation. In your answer you should also explain the essence of the reformer’s (for example, Martin Luther’s) understanding of “Justification by faith.”

A

SDA is a continuation of the reformation. Although Adventism didn’t take on all the doctrine of the Reformation ie baptism, it is important that Adventists see themselves as reformers who has something to offer, the Gospel! Adventism has a message of justification by faith, that started in 1888 and although there were in the past and still today a lot of debate regarding it, it remains the official view of the SDA. The SDA sees justification by faith as the only means to be saved, he acknowledge that there is no merit in himself and that nothing he do can justify him, Justification is an act of Christ, and become the Adventist’s by faith in Jesus Christ.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Comment on the notion of sacrifice according to Karl Barth in “Lecture VIII: God’s Work and Man’s Salvation”.

A

Jesus came to earth to be sacrificed for the sins of humanity, God (Jesus) were satisfied with this sacrifice and thus humanity were saved. In the death of Jesus the incarnation comes to it full totality. This complete humiliation of God was where Jesus satisfied God (including Himself). He (God) accepted the sacrifice made by Himself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

According to Karl Barth in “Lecture VIII: God’s Work and Man’s Salvation” explain the significance of Christ’s resurrection.

A

The resurrection is the other side of the epitome of the incarnation of God. At first he was humiliated on the cross, but now the humiliation was turned around and He proved to be the Messiah. On the crucifixion day, it wasn’t sure if he were the Messiah or not, but on the Resurrection morning there could be no more doubt. With the resurrection, He proved that God cannot die, death has not ultimate power over God. He arose entirely in his Divinity, yet remained a man. If the resurrection didn’t occur, the whole Christian church is built on an illusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
  1. The Messianic Secret
A

The Messianic secret is even a secret for Jesus Himself. Mark 8:27-31 states that Jesus keeps His future open and doesn’t allow it to be conceived or misconceived. Jesus’ true messianic secret is therefore the secret of his suffering. He did not claim Messiahship, he suffered it. Through His suffering He learned obedience, and only in this obedience will He have experienced Himself as Son of God and Messiah. Jesus is the Messiah in His becoming.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
  1. Jesus’ relationship to Abba
A

God’s Spirit creates the reciprocal relationship in which Jesus calls God ‘Abba’ and understands himself as ‘child’ of this Father. Abba is Aramaic baby talk for a parent, the focus however is that whoever Abba is, this person signifies a sheltering, intimate closeness on which the child depends. When Jesus calls God ‘Abba’ He stresses the closeness in which He experiences the divine relationship. The kingdom is so close that God can be called Abba, and when He is called Abba, the kingdom has already come. Jesus demonstrates this nearness by having mercy and compassion on the poor and suffering.

17
Q
  1. The three-Dimensional Person of Jesus Christ
A

We perceive Christ in his eschatological, theological and social person. Eschatologically He is the Messiah of Israel, the bearer of hope to the world and the Kingdom of God in person. Theologically He is the child of God to whom He calls dear Father. He opens a unique relationship with God to all who believe Him and as children of God like Him we cry Abba. Socially He is the brother of the poor, the comrade of the people the friend of the forsaken and the sympathiser with the sick. Believers recognise Him as the brotherly and sisterly human being. In all three dimensions God is a public person.

18
Q

The Great Controversy

A

All humanity is involved in a great controversy between Christ and Satan regarding the character of God, His law and sovereignty. This began when a created being out of free will chose to exalt himself above God and led into rebellion a portion of the angels. Rev 12:7-9 attests of the war in heaven between Michael and the dragon. The dragon lost the war and was cast down from heaven. He became God’s adversary. He was lucifer the light bearer, yet he became nothing more than a fallen angel. He became proud on account of his splendour and wisdom, thus God threw him to the earth and made a spectacle of him before the kings (Ezek 28:12-19). He leads the whole world astray. He introduced sin and rebellion into the world by deceiving Adam and Eve by having them eat from the tree which God forbade them to eat from Gen 3:1. Because of human sin, the image of God has been distorted, this disordering the created world through the corruption of human nature (Rom 1:19-32), and finally leading to the devastation of the world during the world wide flood. The world became the arena of this universal conflict which will finally show the love of God (1Cor 4:9). To assist humanity Christ sends a comforter to guide, protect and sustain humanity through the way of Salvation.

19
Q

The Son

A

Jesus is God. He is the eternal Son, thus the pre-incarnate Son existing since the beginning (John 1:1-2). He became incarnate into human flesh to dwell among us (John 1:14). He is the Creator. All things came into being through Him. Col 1:16 describes creation as being the work of Christ. John 5:19 describes that the Son does whatever the Father does, thus the Son reveals the actions of the Father. The Father gives life (John 3:16). The incarnation characterised Jesus as being truly God and truly man. Regardless of early church heresies it has been accepted at the council of Constantinople that Jesus is fully God and fully human. EGW writes a number of times that the incarnation was Jesus clothing his divinity with humanity. He was born of the HS and of Mary. His natural birth was being born of the Spirit, thus He does not need to be born again (John 3:6). The illegitimacy of Christ is an unfortunate consequence to assert the virginity of Mary. Heb 4:15 asserts that Christ understood temptation, yet He did not sin. Being tempted shows His humanity, but perfectly exemplifying righteousness and love, shows His complete divinity. He never succumbed to sin, thus it had no hold over Him. Miracles attest that Jesus is the Christ, so did prophecy, divine revelation as in the case of Peter (Matt 16:15-17), and demons (Luke 4:41). His death & resurrection testify that He is the Messiah (Luke 24:46), His death and resurrection was for us, and in our place.

20
Q

The Life, death and resurrection of Jesus

A

Jesus accomplishes atonement for our sins through four events: 1. Perfect obedience to God’s will; 2. His suffering; 3. His death; and 4. His resurrection. One needs to view these four events as the whole of the theology of atonement. This atonement is for all who believe in Him so they may have eternal life (John 3:16). This believing or accepting is not established through human behaviour. Christ brings a better understanding of the Father through this work. It not only provides atonement but also answers questions about God’s character that the Great Controversy may have introduced. The logic of perfect atonement is presented via a parallelism: It vindicates the righteousness of God’s law — it condemns our sin; and the graciousness of His character provides for our forgiveness. Christ’s death is substitutionary for us and we should understand as expiation. Sin has been covered on behalf of us, thus turning away God’s wrath from us. Christ’s death reconciles us to Him which then transforms our being. Thus the work of Christ is reflected in the believer making him/her a new creation (2 Cor 5:17-21). Christ’s resurrection is the focus of the Christus victor model in which He triumphs over death, sin and the forces of evil. Death is conquered, thus the wages of sin is no more, and the forces of evil who’s goal it is to cause sin, it renders them impotent for all has been conquered through Christ. Phil 2:5-11 states how Jesus’ life as a servant, his obedience to die on the cross, and his exaltation through his resurrection will declare His Lordship in heaven and on earth.

21
Q

The Experience of Salvation

A

This describes exactly how a person who realises what Christ has done experiences the new reality. The despair of someone drowning opposed to being saved from the waters. It is not concerned with the good works of the believer, it emphasises on how the salvific work of Christ is experienced in the believer. There is no check list to know if you are saved, it is merely knowing that salvation is grounded in faith and that this is the basis of our assurance. The first line is almost a direct quote of 2 Cor 5:21, which in this context is a movement from the objective work of Christ to the subjective consequence in the believer. As sin has been transferred onto Jesus, so righteousness is transferred upon the believer. This experience is God’s work, as it is the Holy Spirit who leads us to sense our need, to acknowledge and take responsibility for the evil that we have done, and then desire to turn away from that life through repentance. Repentance speaks to the intent of the believer. We then exercise our faith by having complete trust and confidence in Jesus. Faith is a gift of God’s grace and thus again there is no way that the believer can claim any of this through himself (Eph 2:8-10). Through Christ we are justified, adopted and delivered. Justification is an act of grace, it is the remission from sin and it is the act of God on behalf of the believer. We are adopted into God’s family as son’s and daughters, this was God’s intent with humanity since the beginning, hence the covenant with Abraham. Now we belong to Christ, making us the seed of Abraham and heirs according to the promise. Our deliverance is also brought through the redemptive works of Christ. The HS sanctifies us and God’s law of love is written in our hearts. We abide in Him and become partakers of the divine nature, and because of Him we have the assurance of Salvation now and in the judgement.

22
Q

Ebionism

A

A sect that taught, that Jesus was a good teacher and prophet, but had no divine qualities. He was simply empowered by God.

23
Q

Docetism

A

Jesus was a divine emanation with no true humanity. Suffering on cross was an illusion. He can only be divine. If he suffered He cannot be God, and if He were to be God he cannot suffer.

24
Q

Arianism

A

Jesus was created being with divine attributes, but not divine in Himself.

25
Q

Appollinarianism

A

Jesus is fully divine and cannot at the same time be fully human.

26
Q

Nestorianism

A

Christ is composed of two separate persons. A God person and a human person

27
Q

Eutychianism

A

the human nature was absorbed by the divine. Like a drop of honey in the ocean.

28
Q

The Post-fall nature of Christ

A

This argues that Christ in His humanity had the nature of Adam AFTER the fall. This would mean that He had the exact same tendencies to evil as the normal man. This imply that Jesus had the same desire to sin as we do. It would argue that he had to overcome sin in the exact same manner as we have to overcome sin, and because he had the same nature as us, and he overcame sin, it is also possible for us to overcome sin completely.

29
Q

The Pre-fall nature of Christ

A

This argues that Christ in His humanity had the nature of Adam BEFORE the fall. This would mean that Christ had no tendency to evil, his nature was blameless and he loathed sin, he had no desire to sin whatsoever. He did share all the innocent infermities with mankind as a result of sin. This argue that the human nature of sin is wrong-being rather than wrong-doing. Since we desire to sin, and Christ didn’t share that desire, it can then be said that the gospel is not a gospel of imitation but rather of relation.