Exam prep Flashcards
Name the four philosophical groundings.
Metaphysical, naturalistic, sociological, rationalistic.
Describe a metaphysical grounding.
Something outside of human control establishes right/wrong: could be God, or could be universal moral principles.
Describe a naturalistic grounding.
Some ways of behaving have an evolutionary reasoning. If we sort our facts about the real world, we will be able to arrive at a reasonable explanation for morality.
Describe a sociological grounding.
Idea: we can observe society to find a ground for ethics.
Describe a rationalistic grounding.
Moves away from metaphysics, natural world, society. Uses rules of logic and reason.
Describe the four types of ethics.
Metaethics: is god our source of moral guidance?
Normative ethics: how to assemble our moral principle
Applies ethics: specific cases of right/wrong. Societal
Descriptive ethics (comparative): study of people’s beliefs about morality
Describe the principle of tolerance (ethics)
We, as outsiders to a culture, cannot say what is right or wrong to a certain person, as our beliefs are different.
Name the four types of relativism
Cultural, ethical, social, metaethical.
Describe Aristotle’s main three ideas about virtue ethics.
- Morally is not individual action, but general disposition.
- You can become a good person through practice.
- A virtue is the golden mean between a vice of deficiency and a vice of excess.
Describe Lawrence Kohlberg’s three levels of moral development
Preconvientional: what’s in it for me? Decrease pain, increase pleasure.
Conventional level: makes me look good. Those are the rules.
Post conventional level: for the greater good. Personal integrity, no matter the price.
Give an overview of ultilitarianism in ONE sentence.
Greatest good for the greatest number of people.
Describe the two points of Kant’s categorical imperative.
- Act in ways which would, if they became universal law, change the world for the better.
- Never use a person or people as a means to and end (respective individuality)
Describe perfect vs imperfect duties
Perfect duties: promises to keep. (Exceptions)
Imperfect duties: goals to help others, when you’re able. (Some exceptions)
Define act vs rule utilitarianism.
Act: making the best choice in one specific situation.
Rule: following a set of rules consistently to lead to good for the greatest number.
What does Kant say about action vs intention.
As long as an action has a good INTENT, the outward consequences can be disregarded.