EXAM Practice Flashcards
Economies of Scale?
Increase the quantity and lower the price (Competitive strategy/Entry barrier)
Economies of Scope?
A decrease in the average cost of production, often when you acquire more than one entity.
If an unregulated firm were free to maximize profits, what q output and price would they charge?
They would charge the highest possible price for the lowest amount of q-outputs.
First move advantage for a natural monopolist?
It’s pretty much impossible for other firms to join the market (entry barriers that’s impossible to beat e.g., Large economies of scale.
If a regulator would regulate the natural monopolist to charge P=MC (social optimal price), what would happen? ( & ett begrepp)
The market would cease to exist because investor would not invest in these kind of market. This is also called “Allocative Efficiency”.
Ramsey Pricing?
When the regulators set P = LRAC for the monopolist. Price is a compromise price. Not as low as social optimal but not as high as profit maximisation (as the monopolist set before the regulation). Investor does still want to invest in the market.
R = TR - TC / K ? (Public utility)
(K is the firms invested capital or rate base) Permitted Rate of Return - if R is to low investor will stay away. If R is to high output will be restricted below social optimal and high profits will occur (not good either).
Regulatory lag?
When costs increase or decrease and this in-turn could impact the utility. If costs goes down, the utiility will earn a value above the rate of return. Vice vers if costs increases. (Also explained as a chock in increase or decrease in costs).
The Averch-Johnson Effect?
The utility’s cost of capital = S(cost of capital) - (r-s) = 2s - R (The regulated utility will invest maximally in capital and still not obtain an
optimal allocation of resources.)
“Averch–Johnson-effekten är reglerade företags tendens att ägna sig åt alltför stora mängder kapitalackumulering för att öka volymen av sina vinster. Om företagens vinst/kapitalrelation regleras till en viss procent så finns det ett starkt incitament för företag att överinvestera för att öka vinsten totalt sett.”
First degree of price-discrimination ?
Perfect discrimination. The consumer pays the highest price he/she is willing to pay.
Second-degree price discrimination ?
Consumers are offered the same price schedule and then consumers self-select into different price categories. (Example Airplane tickets, different prices depending on when you buy or standards(luxury or not)). Pizza Hut example as well: “if you buy a large pizza for 10 dollars you get one medium for 5 dollar (original price of 7).
Third degree of price discrimination?
The company puts the consumers into different price groups. Cinema example: If you’re a senior you just pay 1 dollar but if you are a adult you pay 4. You don’t have the opportunity to choose as you would in second-degree of price discrimination.
Natural monopolist?
Decreasing cost industries are natural monopolies.
Capture theory?
Regulators are influenced by companies (lobbying).
Movement from regulation to deregulation?
New technologies was an underlying reason to deregulation. Supporters of deregulation argues that it will increase efficiency and lower prices.
In the railroads industry (after deregulation)?
They eliminated unprofitable routes (higher economic performance) and increased the rates in markets for railroads: Example higher market share in the transportation market) Interindustry competition increased (Trucking industry vs. Railroad industry).
What does deregulation (often) help with?
Easier for companies to enter the market, often lower AC and lower consumer prices as well.
The theory of creative destruction?
- Capitalism evolves by destroying companies/industries that uses old technologies when new one as been discovered.
- According to Joseph Shumpeter capitalism cannot survive.
Not static efficiency (P=MC) - rather dynamic. Thus the market will not earn any profit when P=MC which will lead to no investment in R&D etc. No development.
Incentives to invest in R&D per market structure?
Monopol = Low
Oligopol = High
Perfect Competition = Moderate
PV(R&D) < PV(benefits)!!
Patent System pros ?
*Patents increase the incentives to invest in R&D by granting contestable monopoly power.
*Patents may result in the optimal level of investment in R&D.
*Patent protection may be necessary for innovation to occur, but there should be a trade-off between the innovation’s time of development and patent life.
Patent Systems cons?
*It is found that patents are not effective in appropriating returns from investments in
innovation.
*Nevertheless, patents can nowadays be used to secure credit (patent pledge-ability).
- Patent-racing?
Monopol Cournot-Nash Equilibrium Quantities?
(a-c)/2b = q*
Monopol Cournot-Nash Equilibrium Price?
a+c/2 = P*
Monopol Cournot-Nash Equilibrium Profit?
(a-c)^2 / 4b
Cournot-Nash Quantites - N firms with Asymmetric information?
(Ci = MC för det företaget du ska räkna ut kvantiteten för)
a-C(i) + N (Cmedel av alla företag - Ci)
/
(N+1)b = q
- OBS! Du räknar nu ut för ett företag endast!!
Cournot Nash quantities - N firms with Symmetric information?
Q*= Nq =
(a-c)/b * n / (n+1)
- OBS!! Du har nu räknat ut marknadens optimala kvantitet. Dela på antal företag igen för att få för varje företag.
Grim Trigger Strategy (trigger price strategy)
A single deviation from cooperation ends cooperation forever.
Deviate?
Break the corporation, “cheat”.
Entry barriers?
- Limit pricing = Charging a low price today in an attempt to deter entry.
- Predator pricing = Predatory pricing assumes that a monopolist maximizes profit until entry occurs, and
after entry, the monopolist expands output aggressively and cuts price, so that the
entrant sustains an economic loss, even if this requires the monopolist to sustain an
economic loss as well. - Advertising
- SEE MORE IN THE PIC.
Bertrand Price Equlibrium Formula (differentiated
products)
P = a / 2b - c
P1 = P2 = P(market)
Bertrand Profit Equilibrium Formula (differentiated
products) - One firm.
(ba)^2 / (2b-c)^2