exam one Flashcards
Adversarial System
Adversarial SystemA system of justice in which opposing parties present competing versions of the evidence in an effort to win a favorable judgment. In the United States, a trial is an adversarial proceeding because lawyers (adversaries) compete to win a verdict in their favor. The American legal system assumes that truth will emerge through a contest between adversaries who present opposing interpretations of the evidence to a neutral fact finder (a jury or judge).
Amicus Curiae Brief
“Friend of the court” brief. A written document submitted to the court by parties with no direct involvement, but a strong interest in the case. The American Psychological Association has submitted such briefs to summarize relevant research and to clarify the overall meaning of a set of findings.
Brandeis Brief
A legal, argumentative document submitted by Louis Brandeis to the 1908 U.S. Supreme Court in Muller v. Oregon. The brief incorporated medical, scientific, and government reports that favored a particular party in the litigation. This document set a precedent for the courts to consider research in their decisions
Brief
Written documents submitted by parties to a judge or panel of judges. Typically, a brief offers interpretations of relevant law and summarizes facts and arguments for a party to the dispute
Code of Professional Responsibility
Code of Professional Responsibility
A set of ethical rules, developed by the American Bar Association (ABA), governing the conduct of lawyers. It requires lawyers to “represent their clients zealously within the bounds of the law.” It focuses on the legal efficacy of an argument as opposed to its veracity.
Culture
A set of shared basic assumptions about the relative importance of competing goals, how disputes should be resolved, and what procedures to follow in striving for goals.
Empirical Legal Studies
An early twenty-first century movement in law schools in which law is studied through data collection and research analyst
Experts
People who have acquired specialized knowledge through significant education or relevant experience. Expert witnesses are usually allowed to provide an opinion in court pertaining to their specialized field.
Gatekeeping Role of Judges
As determined in the U.S. Supreme Court case Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993), judges must assess the scientific validity of potential testimony before allowing it to be heard at trial
Precedent
A past judicial decision that guides judges in making future decisions about similar legal issues.
Suborning Perjury
The criminal act of persuading or purposefully allowing another person to lie about a material issue while under oath
Trier of Fact
The person(s) given responsibility for evaluating that evidence presented at trial and rendering a verdict. In a jury trial, the jury acts as the fact finder while the judge determines which evidence is admissible and the relevant law to be applied
Why was Muller v. Oregon an important case?
First psychological study admitted into the court room
When did the maturation of the relationship between psychology and the law take place?
1960
According to Miller, “Giving Psychology away” means.
using psychology to solve social problems
Psychology is described as ______ while law is ________
descriptive and prescriptive
What is the primary goal of psychological science?
describe human behavior
What is the goal of the legal system?
achieve approximate justice
According to the text, the goal of psychology is to ______. While the goal of the legal system is to _____
Emphazie group characteristics
Emphazies individual case
What is uncertainty avoidance?
how comfortable you are in unstructured situations
Describe the basis of adversarial system in law
truth will come out as a result of conflict between opposing sides
What is peer review?
studying the effectiveness of programs
When considering scientific testimony, gate keeping in the legal sense, includes:
determines whether science should be admitted as evidence