Exam Cases Flashcards

1
Q

R. v. Brown - Charter Section

A

Section 15(1) - Equality Rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

R. v. Brown - Reason for Violation

A

David Brown argued systemic racial profiling during his interaction with police, leading to an unfair arrest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R. v. Brown - Limitations

A

No explicit limitations on Section 15 apply; systemic bias cannot justify discrimination under the Charter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R. v. Latimer - Charter Section

A

Section 7 - Life, Liberty, and Security of the Person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R. v. Latimer - Reason for Violation

A

Robert Latimer argued the mandatory life sentence for ending his disabled daughter’s life violated his Charter rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R. v. Latimer - Limitations

A

The court upheld the sentencing, balancing the right to life against the protection of vulnerable individuals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R. v. Stinchcombe - Charter Section

A

Section 7 - Right to Full Disclosure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R. v. Stinchcombe - Reason for Violation

A

The prosecution failed to disclose key evidence, violating the accused’s right to a fair trial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R. v. Stinchcombe - Limitations

A

Disclosure obligations may be limited if the evidence is privileged or irrelevant, but this was not the case here.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R. v. Patrick - Charter Section

A

Section 8 - Unreasonable Search and Seizure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R. v. Patrick - Reason for Violation

A

The police searched Patrick’s garbage without a warrant, violating his reasonable expectation of privacy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R. v. Patrick - Limitations

A

The court ruled that once garbage is abandoned, privacy expectations diminish, so the search was lawful.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R. v. Oakes - Charter Section

A

Section 11(d) - Presumption of Innocence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R. v. Oakes - Reason for Violation

A

The ‘reverse onus’ in the Narcotics Control Act violated the presumption of innocence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R. v. Oakes - Limitations

A

Section 1 limitations require such laws to be reasonable and demonstrably justified, which was not met here.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

B. (R.) v. Mann - Charter Section

A

Section 7 - Right to Liberty

17
Q

B. (R.) v. Mann - Reason for Violation

A

A social worker’s decision to apprehend a child without proper judicial authorization violated parental rights.

18
Q

B. (R.) v. Mann - Limitations

A

Courts must weigh the child’s best interests against parental rights under Section 7.

19
Q

R. v. Keegstra - Charter Section

A

Section 2(b) - Freedom of Expression

20
Q

R. v. Keegstra - Reason for Violation

A

Keegstra’s conviction for promoting hate speech restricted his freedom of expression.

21
Q

R. v. Keegstra - Limitations

A

Section 1 allows reasonable limits on free speech when it promotes hate or societal harm.

22
Q

R. v. Burlingham - Charter Section

A

Section 10(b) - Right to Counsel

23
Q

R. v. Burlingham - Reason for Violation

A

Burlingham was coerced into confessing without full access to legal counsel.

24
Q

R. v. Burlingham - Limitations

A

Any police action that undermines legal counsel access cannot be justified under Section 1.

25
R. v. Sinclair - Charter Section
Section 10(b) - Right to Counsel
26
R. v. Sinclair - Reason for Violation
Sinclair argued that police failed to allow additional consultation with counsel during interrogation.
27
R. v. Sinclair - Limitations
The court ruled once initial legal counsel is provided, further access is limited unless circumstances change.
28
Vriend v. Alberta - Charter Section
Section 15(1) - Equality Rights
29
Vriend v. Alberta - Reason for Violation
Alberta’s legislation excluded sexual orientation, denying Vriend protection against workplace discrimination.
30
Vriend v. Alberta - Limitations
The court found no justification under Section 1 for excluding sexual orientation from equality protections.
31
R. v. Stillman - Charter Section
Section 8 - Unreasonable Search and Seizure
32
R. v. Stillman - Reason for Violation
Police obtained DNA evidence without proper consent, violating the accused’s right to privacy.
33
R. v. Stillman - Limitations
Evidence obtained unlawfully may still be admissible under Section 24(2) if it does not bring the justice system into disrepute.
34
R. v. Polasheck - Charter Section
Section 8 - Unreasonable Search and Seizure
35
R. v. Polasheck - Reason for Violation
Police exceeded the scope of a search warrant, violating Polasheck’s reasonable expectation of privacy.
36
R. v. Polasheck - Limitations
Searches must strictly adhere to the warrant's terms to avoid breaching Charter rights.
37
R. v. Golden - Charter Section
Section 8 - Unreasonable Search and Seizure
38
R. v. Golden - Reason for Violation
Golden was subjected to an invasive strip search without proper authorization or justification.
39
R. v. Golden - Limitations
Strip searches are only lawful if they are justified and conducted with sensitivity to dignity.