Exam Flashcards
Professional reason (Professional Reasoning in OT: A scoping review (Marquez - Alvarez et al., 2019))
- can be defined as the process used by practitioners to plan, direct, perform, and reflect on the client care
- involves all the thinking processes of the clinician as she/he moves into, through and out of the therapeutic relationship
- a mode of tacit, highly creative and deeply phenomenological thinking
- aimed at determining focus of care for a given client or group of clients
Body of Knowledge on professional reasoning for occupational therapy is still inadequate
(Professional Reasoning in OT: A scoping review (Marquez - Alvarez et al., 2019))
to date, there has been no full, comprehensive review of the scientific literature that would allow us to determine and summarize existing scientific evidence in the area of professional reasoning in occupational therapy
–first article focuses on the clinical reasoning was published in 1982 and aimed to define this area of study within the field of occupational therapy
-Since 1982, there has been a gradual and steady increase in the number of research articles on professional reasoning, which may indicate a growing interest in this area of knowledge
We have to be able to identify three major lines of study
Professional Reasoning in OT: A scoping review (Marquez - Alvarez et al., 2019)
a) professional reasoning in specific fields of practice
b) Professional reasoning among undergraduates and
c) theoretical aspects of professional reasoning
It appears the research on professional reasoning in OT is especially concern with the particularities of reasoning in specific fields
(Professional Reasoning in OT: A scoping review (Marquez - Alvarez et al., 2019))
- to the detriment of the study of information processing that takes place in practice and that shapes professional reasoning in general
- there is a lack of studies focused on the distinctive and unique modalities of reasoning that occur among occupational therapists
- should also be noted that publications from English-speaking countries predominate, particularly the USA, Britain, Australia, and Canada
With regards to the second research question, we have been able to describe how research on professional reasoning in OT has evolved
(Professional Reasoning in OT: A scoping review (Marquez - Alvarez et al., 2019))
Our findings point to three historical periods with distinct characteristics:
a) exploratory phase (1982-1993)
(b) transition phase (1994-2003) and
(c) consolidation phase (2005-present)
Exploratory phase (1982-1993)
Professional Reasoning in OT: A scoping review (Marquez - Alvarez et al., 2019)
the scope of the research that would be developed in later literature is defined, described, and explored
(b) transition phase (1994-2003)
Professional Reasoning in OT: A scoping review (Marquez - Alvarez et al., 2019)
the number of studies increases considerably, the types of studies carried out diversify and there is a significant increase in empirical studies, which outweigh nonempirical studies during these years (qualitative) qualitative articles
Qualitative articles with a phenomenological approach were still predominant
(c) consolidation phase (2005-present)
Professional Reasoning in OT: A scoping review (Marquez - Alvarez et al., 2019)
the research trend is clearly reversed, with a quantitative approach predominating and an increase in the number of literature reviews
Clinical reasoning was coined in the 1980’s to explain clinical decisions are made
( Ch.1: Professional Reasoning as the Basis of Practice)
-basically a blend of technology know how combined with reflection during the process of practice
Professional Reasoning (PR):
Ch.1: Professional Reasoning as the Basis of Practice
the processes used by practitioners to plan, direct, perform and reflect on client care
- term is most reflective of the reasoning associated with OT practice
- It is inclusive- It also includes non medical enviros (school, community)
- It is about framing, implementing, and assessing therapy services
- What is actually going on with the practitioners as they contemplate and engage in therapy actions
The only reason they used clinical reasoning in the title of the book
( Ch.1: Professional Reasoning as the Basis of Practice)
is because its a very common search term so -basically clinical and professional reasoning is the same thing
-Pr theories are focused on the practitioner and how that person goes about doing or designing therapy
Praxis
Ch.1: Professional Reasoning as the Basis of Practice
reasoned actions taken to accomplish a specific task
Reflection in action vs Reflection on action
Ch.1: Professional Reasoning as the Basis of Practice
-Explain how professionals practice and develop expertise
5 succeeding Stages of Expertise (pg 140)
Ch.1: Professional Reasoning as the Basis of Practice
- Novice
- Advanced beginner
- Competent
- Proficient
- Expert
Dewey’s Linear model of reasoning
Ch.1: Professional Reasoning as the Basis of Practice
- Reflecting on ideas
- Formulating hypotheses
- Evaluating hypothesis for truths
- Determining a course of action
- Formulating a verbal statement to represent the hypothesis
Clinical reasoning and core dimensions
Ch.1: Professional Reasoning as the Basis of Practice
context dependent way of thinking and decision making in professional practice to guide practice actions
Core Dimensions: Strong Knowledge base Reflective inquiry -Metacognition
Unsworth’s hierarchical Model of Clinical reasoning
Ch.1: Professional Reasoning as the Basis of Practice
-a 3 tier: hierarchy to depict the relationship between different types of clinical reasoning found in research
Tier 1: therapists is in a life environment and has a worldview - this influences all the models of reasoning
Tier 2: Contains the 3 models of reasoning: procedural, interactive,conditional
Tier 3: pragmatic reasoning
-This model is client centred and the therapist considers the client condition and experience
Schell’s Ecological Model of Professional Reasoning (pg 16)
Ch.1: Professional Reasoning as the Basis of Practice
- Describes PR as a process directly to therapy action which is shaped by factors intrinsic to the therapist and client, as well as extrinsic factors in the practice context
- Echoes the EHP model
- Believes that each practitioner brings a situation knowledge, and skills from life experiences, values, beliefs, etc. - which forms a personal self - a lens the therapist frames the therapy encounter
- On top of the professional self is a layer called the professional self which includes knowledge, skills routines etc.. These two selves work together to respond to issues
- The client also has a personal lens which is topped with a client lens
- Together the client and therapist work altogether to shape the therapy process
EMPR (an ecological Model of Professional Reasoning)
Ch.2: An Ecological Model of Professional Reasoning (EMPR)
evolved as a way of understanding professional reasoning as a transaction among the therapist context. EMPR emerged from a series of lit reviews
Therapy is a function of interplay among
Ch.2: An Ecological Model of Professional Reasoning (EMPR)
the therapist, client and practice context -taking a what we do WITH clients not what we DO to clients
Main assumption:
Ch.2: An Ecological Model of Professional Reasoning (EMPR)
PR is an ecological process that involves multiple therapist, client and context factors
The Therapist (pg 30)
Ch.2: An Ecological Model of Professional Reasoning (EMPR)
reasoning is shaped by their professional (what it mean to be an OT) and personal (mind/body characteristics) lens
The client
Ch.2: An Ecological Model of Professional Reasoning (EMPR)
they also have a personal lens (mind/body) anda client lens (what it means to be an OT client)
Practice Context (pg 34)
Ch.2: An Ecological Model of Professional Reasoning (EMPR)
Where the therapist and client engage in therapy activities includes materials available) ex. time, physical resources, social enviro, caseload, payment, discharge options
Therapy Process
Ch.2: An Ecological Model of Professional Reasoning (EMPR)
Describes therapy actions (what occurs in the evaluation, intervention, discontinuation and follow up phases) that characterize what occurs i the OT process.
Therapy Outcomes
Ch.2: An Ecological Model of Professional Reasoning (EMPR)
Statement or expressions of desired actual outcomes that are a result of the therapist - client transaction in the practice (Goals, QOL, OPP)
Definition of information processing:
Chapter 4: information processing theory and professional reasoning p.73-103
refers to organization of our memories and the processes used to learn and to use information in those memories
Memories
Chapter 4: information processing theory and professional reasoning p.73-103
are organized into stimulations or scripts a professional use these to decide “what works” and “what doesn’t work”
Information processing involves:
Chapter 4: information processing theory and professional reasoning p.73-103
two systems working memory and long-term memory which work together to allow us to learn, comprehend and respond to our experiences
- Basically working memory processes information whereas long term memory stores information
- In professional reasoning information in long-term memory is skewed by information and working memory
Working memory aka short term memory
Chapter 4: information processing theory and professional reasoning p.73-103
mediates our perceptions of the world with our memory but does not store information this allows us to make sense of the incoming information and reflect on what we experience
Long-term memory:
Chapter 4: information processing theory and professional reasoning p.73-103
is the storage system for both declarative knowledge and procedural knowledge. Declarative knowledge is what we know and procedural knowledge is the ability to do something
Theories how information is organized in long-term memory:
Perceptual symbol systems (PSS) theory (p82)
Chapter 4: information processing theory and professional reasoning p.73-103
is grounded system theory that assumes cognition to be grounded ins sensory experiences
Theories how information is organized in long-term memory:
● The ACT model p.83
Chapter 4: information processing theory and professional reasoning p.73-103
long term memory is comprised of two seperate semantic systems of declarative and procedural knowledge. The theory assumes that we store information using a model (non sensory based) semantic representations that have been stripped of sensory representation. Procedural knowledge and declarative knowledge work together in working memory to allow us to understand and respond to our experiences. As our declarative and procedural knowledge become refined with experiences, we rely increasingly on retrieving well learned knowledge and skills form long -term memory. A novice practitioner will have substantial demands placed on their working memory because knowledge in long term is not optimally organized and can’t be fluently accessed and used by working memory
Differences in novice and expert cognition
Knowledge organization
Chapter 4: information processing theory and professional reasoning p.73-103
Novice: Poorly integrated. Simulations are simple and less organized
Expert: highly integrated. Simulations are complex and well organized
Differences in novice and expert cognition
Strategy use:
Chapter 4: information processing theory and professional reasoning p.73-103
Novice: Working backward from the problem presented with no specific plan for problem solving
Expert: Working forward based on a plan for solving the problem from start to finish
Differences in novice and expert cognition
Ability to see patterns
Chapter 4: information processing theory and professional reasoning p.73-103
Novice: does not see patterns in information because the patterns do not exist in long term memory
Expert: Can quickly recognize patterns and information because the patterns match patterns stored in long -term memory
Differences in novice and expert cognition
Automaticity
Chapter 4: information processing theory and professional reasoning p.73-103
Novice: low automaticity with the novice having to think through each step and each step being separate from the other
Expert: High automaticity with the expert. quickly and efficiently because the steps have been combined into larger steps
Differences in novice and expert cognition
Ability to use cues
Chapter 4: information processing theory and professional reasoning p.73-103
Novice: Poor in determining cues and their importance
Expert: Knows what cues to look for and why they are important
Differences in novice and expert cognition
Ability to learn new information:
Chapter 4: information processing theory and professional reasoning p.73-103
Novice: Slower at learning new information related to the topic because the novice lacks the integrated knowledge in which to insert the new information
Expert: Fast learning of topic related information because highly integrated knowledge base exists. the expert plugs into appropriate spots
Scientific reasoning
Chapter 6: Aspects of professional reasoning
- Used to understand the condition that is affecting an individual and to decide on interventions that are in the clients best interest
- Parallel scientific inquiry
- Diagnostic reasoning -clinical problem sensing and problem definition (e.g. considering referral info)
- Procedural reasoning - thinking about the disease or disability and deciding which intervention activities (procedures) the might employ to remediate the person’s functional performance problems (e.g interview or observation of personal engaged in tasks or standardized measures
- Two body practice: body as a machine (procedural) and the person as a life
Narrative reasoning
Chapter 6: Aspects of professional reasoning
- Practitioners find a way to understand the meaning of this experience from the clients perspective
- Help their clients invent new life stories with theirs are so disrupted
Pragmatic reasoning
Chapter 6: Aspects of professional reasoning
- OTts both actively consider and are influenced by their practice contexts (e.g resources for interventions, organizational culture, power relationships among team members, reimbursement practices, and practice trends in the profession
- The OTs personal situation also plays a part (clinical competencies, preferences, commitment to the profession and the role demands outside of work)
Interactive reasoning
Chapter 6: Aspects of professional reasoning
- Gaining trust of clients and using a number of interpersonal strategies that are designed to facilitate collaboration and client centred care
- Doing with as opposed to doing it
Professional reasoning as a conditional process
Chapter 6: Aspects of professional reasoning
Conditional reasoning -therapists attempted to understand their client holistically and imagined their
past, current life experiences and the possible future of the person in the fullness of their life world
-A deep appreciation of both the trajectories of various health or disabling conditions as well as the impact of both personal and contextual variables in the person’s life world
Reasoning and reflection
Chapter 6: Aspects of professional reasoning
- Reflective practitioner: How experts think critically about their own experience
- Reflect in action-think in the midst of action and adapt to meet the demands of the situation, modify the therapy in order to get the just right fit
- Reflect on action- critical thinking that occurs after the practice has occurred
Self-assessment
Chapter 6: Aspects of professional reasoning
- Seek a variety of courses including peers and local experts to support and OTs accurate self-assessment and reflection process
- Evidence based practice model emphasizes the use of outcome data, clinical guidelines, chart review, and other “objective” sources of knowledge
Reasoning And Practice improvement
Chapter 6: Aspects of professional reasoning
- Evidence informed professional thinking (EIPT) -use of knowledge gained through both critical reflection and systematic appraisal of experience and of peer reviewed literature, leading to alternative causal models for clinical problems and interventions
- EIPT therapist consistently collect and measure outcomes. The reason about desired outcomes., identify and observe short term response and outcomes, and reason about long term real world outcomes
- Professional competence is developmental, context dependent and provisional on the therapists habits of mind and habits of performance
Habits of mind
Chapter 6: Aspects of professional reasoning
recurrently and accurately observing and assessing their own thinking, emotional and thinking processes (consistent with self-reflection process)
Intellectual humility
Chapter 6: Aspects of professional reasoning
the willingness to consider that one’s beliefs or assumptions might be wrong
Expertise in OT (good table 140-141)
Chapter 6: Aspects of professional reasoning
- Development is dynamic and influenced by many factors beyond just the years of experience
- Experts do not outperform novices when confronted with unstructured or “messy” problems
Scientific Inquiry
Ch.7 Scientific Reasoning and Evidence in Practice
uses the scientific method to systematically pursue the discovery of knowledge about phenomena that is dependable and defensible and most desired, generalizable
Scientific reasoning
Ch.7 Scientific Reasoning and Evidence in Practice
a process of uncovering, appraising, interrogating, interpreting and using knowledge to make decisions in professional practice
Deductive reasoning
Ch.7 Scientific Reasoning and Evidence in Practice
- impact certainty to the conclusion
- skilled detectives or therapists have strong talents in: seeing what others don’t see, how to tease out more evidence through observing or interviewing, connecting clues, drawing correct inferences from patterns, drawings inferences form limited clues, thinking, counterfactually, systematic exhaustive exploration of alternative explanation, pursuing logical conclusions regardless of cost, and maintaining the courage to question
Inductive Reasoning
Ch.7 Scientific Reasoning and Evidence in Practice
- Holds the potential for generating new knowledge
- Given the empirical evidence available what can we reasonably infer about a pattern or predict about a future event?
Probabilistic and Statistical reasoning
Ch.7 Scientific Reasoning and Evidence in Practice
These mathematical approaches to uncertainty do not provide solutions of certainty but rather they allow us to quantify the level of our uncertainty about an indicative conclusion
-Statistical reasoning also allows us to draw inferences about certain characteristics of a population based on the limited information contained in a sample
Scientific Challenges: Linear to complex
Ch.7 Scientific Reasoning and Evidence in Practice
- Mid 20th century rise of importance of quantitative scientific research in OT
- The use of research findings for the actual practice of the profession has been accelerated by the movement towards evidence based practice (mid 1990’s)
Scope of scientific reasoning
what are the embedded occupations of reasoning scientifically in the field of OT?
Ch.7 Scientific Reasoning and Evidence in Practice
1) In the creation and testing of disciplinary knowledge through scientific inquiry (conducting research for evidence supported practice: demonstrating the general efficacy of OT)
2) In the use of principles of logic and scientific reasoning about cases in actual practice
3) In the application of the finding of 1) to the actions in 2) evidence informed practice
Evidence informed practice
Ch.7 Scientific Reasoning and Evidence in Practice
- The use of published evidence along with clinical experience the practitioner and expertise of others, the values, goals, preferences and wishes of the client; the available resources of the practice setting
- With these four above therapists blend two more sources of info for decision making: theories as to causality of human occupation and the evaluation data and data from client responses to interventions collected by OT
- Ask clinical questions, trackdown best evidence from the literature. Appraise the evidence, use evidence to formulate practice guidelines, evaluate the impact of new guideline
Application of scientific reasoning
Ch.7 Scientific Reasoning and Evidence in Practice
referral, therapeutic relations, FOR, occupational profile, analysis of occupational performance, intervention plan, intervention plan implementation, effective activity sequence, effective pacing, adjusting the plan/responding to feedback, extending therapeutic effects, intervention review, outcomes
—>detailed examples in text of scientific reasoning in these areas
errors in Scientific Reasoning
Ch.7 Scientific Reasoning and Evidence in Practice
Lists of errors in scientific reasoning come from three sources: studies of medical diagnosticians (cause of performance deficits could be misidentified) general studies of reasoning errors people make, and empirical study of practice reported by OTs
Narrative thinking
Chapter 8, Narrative Reasoning
Subjective, personalised particulars of lived experience, intention and action connecting events across time
- ->Not to be generalized beyond the narrator
- we live a narrative made up of our occupational choices
Narrative reasoning
Chapter 8, Narrative Reasoning
mode of thought essential to identity
- Use of narrative reasoning to venture out of one’s own perspective and into that of the client, look at the story from their POV they are the main character
- ->Empathize
- ->Helps us to stay client centred
- Go beyond the intellectual reasons and OPIs allow the client to be a real person and remain client centred
- ->be willing to let go of your plan
Narrative = story in OT litterature
Chapter 8, Narrative Reasoning
- Occupations reflect personal uniqueness and identity, we identify by what we do and how we narrate our world
- This is dynamic interpretation of identity
- ->includes: experiences, intentions, psychology, group membership, personal history, emotional responses, personality traits, role etc
positive life stories promote self-esteem lesser ones do the opposite
- aspects of personality affect how people tell their stories
- Life stories become our perception of reality
Health challenges threaten life story and identity
Chapter 8, Narrative Reasoning
Narrative wrek
- Can reform sel-image by telling new stories, reframing thinking
- Hearing people’s stories and how they tell them gives the OT perspective into their identity and what is important to them
- Stories socialize and impart culture, define norms, an how to cope with deviations
- People tend not to include the ordinary in narratives, as OTs we must ask questions to get this
The illness Narrative
Chapter 8, Narrative Reasoning
tells the story of life altered by illness
-What is it like to live with a disease or condition
The occupational narrative
Chapter 8, Narrative Reasoning
- Shows the relationship between health and participation
- ->illness, disability, or restriction when present or at risk
- Places occupational performance into context
- Expresses meaning behind occupations and relationships
Narrative reasoning
Chapter 8, Narrative Reasoning
Inductive cognitive strategy of telling and interpreting occupational narratives to inform client-centred practice
-Created a collaborative story we can enact in treatment
Storytelling:
Chapter 8, Narrative Reasoning
makes meaning by telling and listening to stories bridging the occupational past from the actual world of illness disability or OPPs to the present possibility of occupational wholeness and healing
–>repairs narrative wreck
- We set up therapeutic climate within which the client uses their performance skills, patterns, and client factors to identify embedded stories
- Respect the confidentiality of your client stories
Recognize stories by looking for common elements
Chapter 8, Narrative Reasoning
- Acor
- action
- Scene
- Goals
- Instruments
- Trouble
- ->can be acute (heart attack) or chronic (MS)
- ->problems with occupational performance
Bread and water can be tea and toast
Chapter 8, Narrative Reasoning
- Elicit stories from clients to get more meaningful informations
- Ask for stories directly using open-ended questions
- Ask about past challenges and the response to them
- Allow stories to emerge during standardized assessments
- ->COPM
Listening to Narratives:
Listen for plot details
Chapter 8, Narrative Reasoning
- these details can help or hinder progress
- Directs intervention
Progressive plots
-life doesnt stop with disability I choose life
Stable plots
-life comes to a halt
Regressive plots
-Life is deteriorating
Listening to Narratives:
Listen for who has agency and locus of control
Chapter 8, Narrative Reasoning
- Vistimic
- Agentic
Listening to Narratives:
Relating the body to others, control, and desire
Chapter 8, Narrative Reasoning
Restitution narratives
- Illness as transitory
- Often acutely or recently ill
- Cure seeking
- Hope
Chaos
- Nothing will get better
- No one is in cont4rol
- No future
- No hope
- Like “living in hell”
Quest narrative
- Like the hero’s journey
- face the suffering head on
- OPPs beyond the chief compliant
Listening to Narratives:
Listening for the truth
Chapter 8, Narrative Reasoning
- People live atypical lives
- ask questions but don’t assume they are lying
Story distoritions
Chapter 8, Narrative Reasoning
- Feeling can be projected onto the therapists
- Transference and countertransference
Story therapists tell each other
Chapter 8, Narrative Reasoning
- Cultural norms and values
- Think or major lectures
Story making
Chapter 8, Narrative Reasoning
Prospective narrative reasoning that links the present to the future by imagining the effect of illness, disability or occupational performance problems in future contexts
- ->ie. making goals by projecting the needs of a preschooler into what they will need as a kindergartener
- ensure client and therapist are in the same story
- Stories are not told but acted through the intervention process, structured around meaningful daily tasks
- Make interventions fill gaps between where they are and where they want to be
- ->what is most important
- Acting out plot show that it will not be linear process, guide, communicate progress
- Stay motivated when goals need to be changed, advocate fro resources
- Let the temporality alert us to new issues
- ->what will be hard with changing seasons
Narrative reasoning is an expert process,
Chapter 8, Narrative Reasoning
as a student knowing there are many perspectives will help us get there
-Use narrative reasoning to edit life and past stories
Pragmatic Reasoning
Chapter 9 Schell and Schell Pragmatic Reasoning
describes the practitioner thinkings that focuses on the everyday realities that affect the delivery of service; therapy happens in the real world
- attend to the contextual factors
- See things as they really are and find ways to deal with them
Focusses on the practice context and personal context
Chapter 9 Schell and Schell Pragmatic Reasoning
- address the world in which therapy occurs
- the possibility of treatment within a certain setting
- Important not to get stuck in one way thinking, following one part of policy, or one way of accessing funding, this severely limits therapy
- Be willing to improvise
- You are somewhat limited by your own repertoire of therapy skills. negotiation skills, practice culture, and motivation
Therapist intentions are influenced by four factors
Chapter 9 Schell and Schell Pragmatic Reasoning
- Attitude
- ->I always get good results with this approach - Subjective norm
- ->We are expected to do this with all our patients - Perceived behavioural control
- ->I am really not sure I can do this correctly - Personal norms
- ->Core beliefs and world views
Pragmatic reasoning and external context table
Organizational norms and policies
Chapter 9 Schell and Schell Pragmatic Reasoning
- Teamwork
- Perceived organizational expectations
- Power relations
Pragmatic reasoning and external context table
Time
Chapter 9 Schell and Schell Pragmatic Reasoning
- Scheduling
- Treatment duration
Pragmatic reasoning and external context table
Physical Resources
Chapter 9 Schell and Schell Pragmatic Reasoning
- Space
- Supplies and Equipment
Pragmatic reasoning and external context table
Caseload
Chapter 9 Schell and Schell Pragmatic Reasoning
- Number of clients
- Kinds of clients
- Prioritization
Pragmatic reasoning and external context table
Payment of Services
Chapter 9 Schell and Schell Pragmatic Reasoning
- Insurance or government coverage
- Client ability to pay
Pragmatic reasoning and external context table
Discharge Options
Chapter 9 Schell and Schell Pragmatic Reasoning
- Place
- Timing
Personal Context Factors Requiring Pragmatic Reasoning
Chapter 9 Schell and Schell Pragmatic Reasoning
- Therapist skills
- ->Competence
- ->Experience and confidence
- Personal Characteristics
- ->Bodily Factors (Short people may pick a different transfer method)
- ->sensory preferences
- ->Emotional stability
Why do therapy and skills that we are comfortable with
Chapter 9 Schell and Schell Pragmatic Reasoning
When you are a hammer everything looks like a nail
Ethics
Ch 10: Ethical Reasoning
in our roles as practitioners, educators, and researchers, we confront an increasing number of ethical challenges in our daily work lives
-Clients and families place their trust in therapists to act in their best interests. This is a moral and ethical imperative as important as specific practice process. Ethical reasoning without action is confined to thinking about intellectualization. True moral character leads to practitioner to go beyond thinking, to take action, and learn from action
Philosophical Ethical Theories
Ch 10: Ethical Reasoning
- Focus on Consequences (Utilitarianism): the end justifies the means
- Focus on action (Deontology): the act itself, or the means, is what is important, not the consequence
Basic Ethical Principles
Ch 10: Ethical Reasoning
-Shared moral norms that provide a framework for analyzing ethical issues and reflecting on the common morality
Basic Ethical Principles:
Beneficence
Ch 10: Ethical Reasoning
actions that benefit others; actively “doing good” and considering potential for harm
Basic Ethical Principles:
Nonmaleficence
Ch 10: Ethical Reasoning
Refrain from causing harm; assess risk of benefit and avoid actions that may be harmful