Exam 4-Policy Flashcards
Which court cases compose the exclusionary rule?
Miranda, Gideon, & Mapp
Miranda v. Arizona
people cannot be coerced into confession (Miranda rights)
Gideon v. Wainwright
right to an attorney
Mapp v. Ohio
search and seizure
Obergefell v. Hodges
legalized gay marriage
Citizens United v. FEC
giving money to a candidate is a form of free speech and therefore cannot be restricted by the government
NFIB v. Sebelius
the court case that kept Obamacare in place
DC v. Heller
legal to own a gun but cannot carry it around
Roe v. Wade
legalized abortion
Dobbs v. Jackson Health Center
overturned Roe v. Wade
Engle v. Vitale
prohibits the requirement for teacher-led prayer in school
Kitzmiller v. Dover School District
attempt to sue the school district for not having a class centered around the idea that God created the universe
Gibbons v. Ogden Interstate Commerce
government has the power to regulate interstate commerce
Lawrence v. Texas
as long as there are two consensual adults, any type of sex is legal
Crawford v. Washington
“heresay” is not recognized as valid evidence in court
Grutter v. Bollinger
practice of affirmative action- court ruled that race could be used in decisions to create more diversity in certain environments
US v. Nixon
president does have executive immunity and privilege, but that does not extend to the commitment of a crime
McDonnell v. Green
don’t need direct evidence to prove that a crime was committed
Reynolds v. Sims
“one man, one vote”- any kind of district that is used for elections, to possible extent, should be the same size in terms of population
Lemon v. Kurtzman
parochial (Christian) schools can get funding from the government, but they must pass the Lemon Test
NY Times v. US
it is legal to publish illegally obtained information
NY Times v. Sullivan
libel in the press- must be false, person who made the claim must know that it is false, and it must be printed/said with malice
Edwards v. SC
right to peaceable assembly
Concurring opinion
a written opinion by judges in court supporting a decision with reasoning for why
Dissenting opinion
a written opinion made by judges in court that disagrees with the majority
Civil liberties
protection against government infringement on rights
Civil rights
protection against infringement by persons and/or government
Strict scrutiny test
the court will look at policies to make sure that they are the least restrictive policies in regards to religion
Schenck v US
if the things you say present a clear and present danger, you can be prevented from having freedom of speech
Brandenburg v Ohio
government allows hate speech if it doesn’t present a clear and present danger
Tinker v Des Moines School District
personal expression can’t be restricted
Sunset legislation
legislation with a deadline
McDonald v Chicago
extended federal gun rights to states
Miller v California
against obscene materials
Ex-post facto laws
if you commit a crime that wasn’t a crime when you committed it, you can not be given criminal charges
Bills of attainder
a bill passed by Congress declaring that someone is guilty of a crime
Double jeopardy
you cannot be charged twice for the same crime
Self-incrimination (5th Amendment)
Once you take immunity, you cannot plead the 5th
Habeas corpus
police cannot put you in jail without charging you with a crime
Right to a speedy trial
the government cannot delay your trial
De jure segregation
making law to discriminate
De facto segregation
segregation by circumstance
Dred Scott v Sanford
Dred Scott sued for his own freedom, lost the case because he was considered only ¾ of a person
Plessy v Ferguson
Constitutional establishment of “separate but equal”
Brown v Board of Education
Overruled Plessy v Ferguson
Swann v Mechlenberg County
forced integration in schools
Civil Rights Act of 1964
No more discrimination, cannot discriminate on basis of race, sex, national origin, age, and disability was added later