Exam 3: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Flashcards

1
Q

Difference between systemic review and narrative review

A
  • Systemic review: identify, appraise, and synthesize all empirical evidence that meets pre-specified eligibility criteria to answer a given research question; explicit methods used to minimize bias
  • narrative: qualitative summary of evidence on a given topic; informal and subjective methods to collect and interpret info (written by “expert” in field)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

types of review

A
  • effectiveness of interventions
  • accuracy of diagnostic tools
  • identification of prognostic factors
  • methodological factors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

who is Archibald Cochrane and what is he known for and why

A

-wrote book “effectiveness and efficiency: random reflections on health services” led to the development of the Cochrane collaboration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Cochrane collaboration

A
  • international not-for-profit organization dedicated to promotion of clinical trials evidence and development and dissemination of SRs of healthcare interventions
  • primary product: Cochrane database of systematic reviews
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Cochrane review

A

-Def: SRs of research in healthcare and health policy that are published in the Cochrane database of SRs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

types of SRs published in Cochrane reviews

A
  1. intervention reviews
  2. diagnostic test accuracy reviews
  3. methodology reviews
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

the purpose of a systematic review

A
  • to identify and combine studies using explicit methods to reduce bias
  • do not typically define appropriate actions or incorporate values
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is the process of conducting an SR?

A

state the study objective–>develop the protocol–>develop a search strategy–>conduct the search–>retrieve relevant papers–>screen and select papers that meet established criteria–>evaluate methodological quality of selected studies–>analyze and synthesize findings–>determine if stats data are sufficient for further analysis (if no, the report results of SR); if yes, analyze the effect size estimates–>report results of meta-analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

are PICO questions used in systematic reviews

A

yes, used to formulate the research question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how is the research question for an SR defined?

A
  • a well formulated question that guides the review process
  • assists with determining: eligibility criteria, searching for studies, collecting data from included studies and presenting findings
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

is the literature review for a systemic review exhaustive?

A
  • yes??; need to pick ones specifically for your review
  • select key words
  • identify resources that include relevant information (Cochrane, previously published SRs, databases available, reference checking)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what databases are searched when conducting a SR?

A
  • search at least 3

- Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Web of Science, EBM reviews

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

7 types of bias’ that can influence the outcome/quality of a SR

A
  1. selection bias
  2. confounding bias
  3. allocation bias
  4. performance bias
  5. attrition bias
  6. detection bias
  7. reporting bias
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
  1. selection bias
A

may distort tx effects

-random allocation and concealment are essential

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
  1. confounding bias
A

systematic differences in factors related to intervention and outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
  1. allocation bias
A

Systematic differences due to the way that tx groups are assemebled

17
Q
  1. performance bias
A

differences in the provision of care to experimental and control groups
-blind those who receive and give care

18
Q
  1. attrition bias
A

differential loss of subjects across comparison groups

-intention to treat analysis, people drop out

19
Q
  1. detection bias
A

outcome differs across comparison groups

-quality assessment tools: quality assessment may provide explanations for differences in study results

20
Q
  1. reporting bias
A

systematic differences between reported and unreported findings

21
Q

what are the rating scales used for an SR

A
  • Jaded scale, Pedro scale, QUADAS scale
  • no gold standard, most scoring systems have not been validated
  • PT-related scales should take into account: pt adherence, standardization of tx protocol, precision of performance of intervention, validity, reliability, and responsiveness to the tests and measures
22
Q

how many people review the systematic review prior to its publication?

A
  • minimum of 2 primary reviewers

- disagreement= describe if resolved by consensus or by resolution from a 3rd party

23
Q

how do you read a Forest Plot?/how is it constructed?

A

-has 5 odds ratios (squares, proportional to weights used in meta-analysis), with the summary measures (center line of diamond) and associated confidence intervals (lateral tips of the diamond), and a solid vertical line of no effect

24
Q

purpose of Forest Plot

A

-illustrates results of individual studies and a cumulative summary; visually understand the inconsistency in findings and large variance in several studies for this review

25
Q

what is meta-analysis?

A

statistically combining results from 2 or more separate studies to estimate an “average” or “common” effect
-improves the precision of the estimated treatment effect

26
Q

what are the two states in a meta-analysis?

A

Stage 1. calculation of confidence intervals for each study

  • extraction of data from each individual study and the calculation of a result for each study with an estimate of the chance variation we would expect with studies like that
  • Evaluate heterogeneity (chi-square test)

Stage 2: calculation of pooled average result across all studies

  • give greater weight to the results from studies
  • effect size, effect size index, weighting effect size
27
Q

what is the relationship between a meta-analysis and a SR

A

-SR refers to the entire process of selecting, evaluating, and synthesizing all available evidence, while meta-analysis refers to the statistical approach to combining the data derived from an SR

28
Q

What is PRISMA

A

Preferred Reporting Items for SRs and Meta-Analysis: a checklist for reporting them

  • making sure it has all of the components
  • abstract, intro, methods, results, discussion, funding