Exam 3: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Flashcards
Difference between systemic review and narrative review
- Systemic review: identify, appraise, and synthesize all empirical evidence that meets pre-specified eligibility criteria to answer a given research question; explicit methods used to minimize bias
- narrative: qualitative summary of evidence on a given topic; informal and subjective methods to collect and interpret info (written by “expert” in field)
types of review
- effectiveness of interventions
- accuracy of diagnostic tools
- identification of prognostic factors
- methodological factors
who is Archibald Cochrane and what is he known for and why
-wrote book “effectiveness and efficiency: random reflections on health services” led to the development of the Cochrane collaboration
Cochrane collaboration
- international not-for-profit organization dedicated to promotion of clinical trials evidence and development and dissemination of SRs of healthcare interventions
- primary product: Cochrane database of systematic reviews
Cochrane review
-Def: SRs of research in healthcare and health policy that are published in the Cochrane database of SRs
types of SRs published in Cochrane reviews
- intervention reviews
- diagnostic test accuracy reviews
- methodology reviews
the purpose of a systematic review
- to identify and combine studies using explicit methods to reduce bias
- do not typically define appropriate actions or incorporate values
what is the process of conducting an SR?
state the study objective–>develop the protocol–>develop a search strategy–>conduct the search–>retrieve relevant papers–>screen and select papers that meet established criteria–>evaluate methodological quality of selected studies–>analyze and synthesize findings–>determine if stats data are sufficient for further analysis (if no, the report results of SR); if yes, analyze the effect size estimates–>report results of meta-analysis
are PICO questions used in systematic reviews
yes, used to formulate the research question
how is the research question for an SR defined?
- a well formulated question that guides the review process
- assists with determining: eligibility criteria, searching for studies, collecting data from included studies and presenting findings
is the literature review for a systemic review exhaustive?
- yes??; need to pick ones specifically for your review
- select key words
- identify resources that include relevant information (Cochrane, previously published SRs, databases available, reference checking)
what databases are searched when conducting a SR?
- search at least 3
- Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Web of Science, EBM reviews
7 types of bias’ that can influence the outcome/quality of a SR
- selection bias
- confounding bias
- allocation bias
- performance bias
- attrition bias
- detection bias
- reporting bias
- selection bias
may distort tx effects
-random allocation and concealment are essential
- confounding bias
systematic differences in factors related to intervention and outcome