Exam #3 - Contract Law Flashcards
Background info of a contract
- not every contract is enforceable
- contract law is ancient law but has evolved to reflect social change
- founded on tradition
- it is immoral to not keep a promise which is why contracts were created
2 main goals of contract law
- autonomy/certainty (supports what people want to do)
2. fairness
Elements of a contract
- agreement
- consideration (look at exchange between the parties)
- capacity (who can legally enter into a contract)
- lawful object (an object or action that is not illegal)
Contract law = strict liability (so state of mind does not matter)
true or false?
TRUE
What happens when a promise is broken in contract law?
A remedy occurs
Unilateral contract
- one promise (in exchange for performance)
- one party promises to do something in the future
- contract is formed at the time of the promise
ex: I ask you to replace my car’s battery and if you show up (but you don’t have to) I will give you $500
ex: loyalty programs (the brusters stamp card where on the tenth stamp I get a free one or a discount
Bilateral contract
- 2 promises
- contract is formed at the time of the promise
- both parties are promising to do something in the future
ex: I ask a mechanic to come fix my car battery on Friday for $500
Express contract
when you expressily promise (either orally or in writing)
Implied contract
- implied in fact = implied from circumstances
- nothing specific but one can assume based on the circumstances
ex: two companies who have done business together for 20+ years when suddenly one leaves then they are breaching an implied contract
Valid contract
a contract that can be enforced
Voidable contract
one or both parties have a reason by law that the contract can be voided if one or both parties choose to do so
Void contract
a contract that cannot be enforced by law even if both parties want it to
Executory contract
a contract is in place but one or both parties have not performed yet
ex: the mechanic came to my house the day I asked him to but I was not home
Executed contract
the contract was fully performed on both ends and the contract is over
ex: mechanic came to my house on Friday like I asked and I paid him the $500
Treaty
a contract between countries
choice of law system can allow for parties to opt out of a treaty
Sources of contract law
- common law
- uniform commercial code (UCC - sale of goods only)
- convention on the International sale of goods (CISG)
Uniform commercial code (UCC)
- ONLY applies to sale of goods (tangible, movable, personal property)
- does NOT apply to sale of service, intangible (stocks or intellectual property) and real estate
Mixed sale situation
deals with an issue of goods AND services to determine which is the dominant one is a contract
gravamen test or predominate factor test
Gravamen test
- deals with a mixed sale situation
- looks at the breach (what the complaint filed was about) and determines if that is a goods or service issue
Predominate factor test
- deals with mixed sale situation
- 4 factors
1. language of contract (ex: “repair” or “inspection”)
2. nature of business (ex: oil change is due for the car)
3. reason for contract (ex: bringing a car in for an oil change)
4. amounts charged (ex: goods: 25% and service 75%)
Quasi contract
- court will give a remedy as if there was a valid contract in place
- prevents UNJUST ENRICHMENT (unfair for someone to not pay for it)
- NOT someone doing you a favor without you asking and then asking/expecting compensation
ex: guy hires contractor to fix city sewage pipe and city gave him a permit to do it and then refused to reimburse him for it even though it was their responsibility to fix in the first place
Promissory estoppel (4 elements)
- a promise
- reasonable reliance
- actual reliance
- INJUSTICE
- this stops someone from backing out of their promise because of reliance
- a reasonable person would have relied on the promise
Holt vs Home Depot (example of promissory estoppel)
- Home Depot had an open door policy when it came to complaints
- 2 senior managers terminated Holt after they complained
- promissory estoppel because in the employee handbook there was the open door policy and it promised to not have any consequences for using it (reasonable person would rely on a company policy stated in a company document)
Material and non-material breach
- material breach or non-material breach
- factors: magnitude of breach, good faith, timing, extent that injured party can be compensated for damages
- did the breach deprive party from reasonable expectation?
example of material breach: hired you to paint my house and you only painted half of it
example of non-material breach: hired you to paint my house and you painted everything except a 2’x2’ area