Exam 3 Flashcards

1
Q

Unobtrusive Research

A

Methods that gain information from studying social behavior without affecting it.

The unobtrusive approach often seeks unusual data sources, such as garbage, graffiti and obituaries, as well as more conventional ones such as published statistics.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Content analysis

A

the study of message, NOT how someone uses it

Samples are smaller than surveys

Process of judging sample size uses same logic as surveys

Example: (See phone pic)

    NOT how advertising influences you (see phone pic for example)
    NOT how news are read
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Appeals

A

strategies used to try to convince you

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the top 7 appeals used in advertising?

A
  1. Wealth/prestige/success
  2. Sex
  3. Humor
  4. Sports/adventure
  5. Holidays
  6. Tradition
  7. Taste/quality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Krippendorf’s Six Questions

A

These are questions that must be addressed in every content analysis:

  1. Which data is analyzed?
  2. How are they defined?
  3. What is the population from which they are drawn?
  4. What is the context relative to which the data are analyzed?
  5. What are the boundaries of the analysis?
  6. What is the target of the inferences?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Elaborate on the CDC example as discussed in class.

A

?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Elaborate on the Rimm report example as discussed in class.

A

?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are McMillan’s five issues for coding web content?

A
  1. How to identify the units to be sampled?
  2. How to collect data for cross-coder tests when the Web changes rapidly?
  3. How to solve copyright issues if researchers download Web pages for analysis?
  4. How to standardize units of analysis given the multimedia features of the Web?
  5. How to check inter-coder reliability?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the pros and cons of content analysis?

A

?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

True or False?

Experiments are the best way to determine causation.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the functions of an experiment and what is a common real world example?

A

Experiments involve exposing one group to something, not exposing that same thing to a second congruent group, and analyzing the reaction of the exposure and comparing it to the group who did not receive it.

Ex: Randomized controlled trial of a drug; does drug “X” help alleviate depression?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The experimental method is best for what type of research?

A

The experimental method is best for research that:

  • Has limited and well defined concepts
  • Relies heavily on hypothesis testing
  • Determines Causality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the independent and dependent variables in all experimental designs?

A

Independent variables are the parts of the experiment that can be controlled or changed.
Dependent variables within experiments are defined as “the effect” [what is the main measure of the study?]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does the laboratory setting compare to the natural setting in experimental designs?

A

In Lab settings, you will always have a high rate of control. [ you can assess if you actually take the medicine or not] the only thing that varies is what action you take.[the control]

In Natural settings like field studies, you night not have as much control due to external factors such as emotions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the pros and cons of experiments?

A

Pros

    Isolation of experimental variable’s impact over time - best way to determine causality!

    Replication

Cons

    Not representative - experiments are generally not random

    Artificiality of laboratory settings
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is random selection mean in an experimental design?

A

Random selection - Randomly select people who will be interviewed for a survey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Random assignment

A

Looking at group of people that were not randomly selected and then randomly assigning them to experimental groups

Giving everyone equal chance → Eliminates pre-existing systematic group differences; people don’t get to choose what group they will be in

        “All other things being equal”
        Groups are similar
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Draw an example of a 2x2 factorial design

A

See ipad pic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Draw an example of a 2x3 factorial design

A

see ipad pic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Ellaborate on the classic bobo doll experiment. What was the goal, control group, exposure group, hypothesis, independent variable, dependent variable, and results?

A

Study by Albert Bandura et al.

Goal: to study patterns of behavior associated with aggression [Has serious implications on parenting and schooling]

Hypotheses: Children witnessing an adult role model behaving in an over aggressive manner would likely replicate similar behavior themselves - are they more aggressive than kids that saw a non-aggressive role model? Children who had observed a non-aggressive adult would be the least likely to show violent tendencies.

Children would be more influenced by same-sex adults - manipulation of behavior and gender of adult (2 independent variables with 2 attributes each - gender and behavior = 2 x 2 factorial model)

Independent variable: The exposure to the models both aggressive and non-aggressive.

Dependent Variable: The Preschool kids [36 boys & 36 girls aged 3-6] who received the exposure to both aggressive and non-aggressive models.

Exposure to aggressive modeling:

  1. A child & the adult model in a playroom - one corner with highly appealing activities and another corner with a toy set, mallet, and inflatable Bobo doll.
  2. Before leaving, the experimenter told the child not to lay w/ the toys in the adult corner.
  3. After a min of playing w/ the toy set, the adult in the aggressive model scenario would attack the doll

Results

Children exposed to aggressive model were more likely to act in physically aggressive ways than those who were not exposed to the aggressive model

Children more influenced by same-sex models
Males more aggressive than females

Social learning theory: aggressive behavior is learned through observing and imitating of others

Increased appeal to guns even though they had never been exposed to them before

Also picked up hostile language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

For what reasons would you want to conduct your research via experimental analysis rather than survey analysis and what are the 2 weaknesses in doing so?

A

you would use an experiment instead of a survey if:
You want to control the analysis perfectly = find causation

Two weaknesses:

  1. The experiment is not necessarily representative of the population
  2. The environment is artificial
22
Q

What is internal validity in experimental designs?

A

In order for your experimental data to be internally valid, the data must accurately reflect what went on in the experiment.

23
Q

How could “maturation” affect the internal validity of an experiment?

A

In a long-term study, where the examinees are revisited after a year or so, their perspectives and maturity level has changed.

In a short-term study, examinees can experience exhaustion and boredom.

24
Q

How could “experimental morality” affect the internal validity of an experiment?

A

examinees nay die during the span of the study.

25
Q

What is “Diffusion or irritation of treatments” in an experiment?

A

when a portion of the control group recieves treatment and become “contaminated”

26
Q

How does “compensation” affect internal validity?

A

The researchers over compensate for the control group. [Not showing as much concern for the control group because you know nothing will happen, and showing strong concern for the treatment group because you are aware of the treatment.]

27
Q

What method of administering treatment is used to ensure compensation will not be a threat to internal validity?

A

Double Blind Experiments

[Both the examinees and treatment administers are unaware of who gets treatment and who does not.

28
Q

How does “instrumentation” affect internal validity?

A

If what you are using to measure data in the pretest is not consistent with that used to measure data in the posttest, your gonna have a bad time.

29
Q

External Validity

A

How conclusions drawn fromm experimental results relate to the real world.
Not a strength of experiments.

30
Q

How did the discussion in class about “WEIRD” people demonstrate external validity?

A

Behavioral scientists routinely publish broad claims about human psychology and behavior in the world’s top journals based on samples drawn entirely from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) societies.

Researchers, often implicitly, assume that either there is little variation across human populations, or that these “standard subjects” are as representative of the species as any other population.

→ Are these assumptions justified?

Most sample groups are college students -- non-representative. This studies groups across cultures.

Review of the behavioral sciences suggests both that there is a substantial variability in experimental results across populations and that WEIRD subjects are particularly unusual compared with the rest of the species -- frequent outliers.

The domains reviewed include visual perception, fairness, cooperation, spatial reasoning... (incomplete)

The findings suggest that members of WEIRD societies, including young children, are among the least representative populations one could find for generalizing about humans.
Many of these findings involve domains that are associated with fundamental aspects of psychology, motivation, and behavior -- hence, there are no obvious a priori grounds for claiming that a particular behavioral phenomenon is universal based on sampling from a single subpopulation.
31
Q

What are the six steps in the experimental design?

A
  1. Come up with a research idea
  2. Articulate one hypothesis
  3. Who will be in your subjects and how will you put them in groups?
  4. What is the factorial design?
  5. What are you independent and dependent variables?
  6. What will you statistically test?
32
Q

What is the elemental context of field research?

A

The subject’s natural setting
Feild research is qualitative in a sense that tries to understand behaviors and attitudes in their natural settings. Field research avoids artificiality but isn’t perfectly natural.

33
Q

What are some elements of social life appropriate to field research?

A
  • Practices
  • Episodes
  • Encounters
  • Roles and social types - Ex. “Designated Driver” = role in driving
  • Social & personal relationships
  • Groups & cliques
  • Organizations
  • Settlements & habitats
  • Social worlds
  • Subcultures & lifestyles

[You want to observe what happens, how it happens, why, who, where in order to gain an in-depth understanding of your subjects that cannot be gained with a survey]

34
Q

Roles of the researcher

A

?

35
Q

Reflexivity

A

The researcher being aware of hi/her effect on the process and outcomes of the research.
[being aware that your presence effects the outcomes of what you are observing.]

36
Q

How is field research inductive?

A

The researcher in field research uses grounded theory by observing, processing the observations into focal concepts, and then develops theories using those focal concepts. [Trying to make sense of it]

37
Q

What are the 5 guidelines in developing theories within field research?

A
  1. Think conservatively - Think as objectively as you can
  2. Obtain multiple viewpoints - You don’t want to go to Chilifest and just hang out with the old folks on the hill. You’ll never see what happens in other groups. Get multiple viewpoints to make your view as objective & as comprehensive as possible.
  3. Periodically step back - Sit by yourself and think through things. Clear your mind. Go back and observe things again, perhaps from a new viewpoint.
  4. Maintain an attitude of skepticism - You want to observe and come back with the most objective view that you can come up with.
  5. Follow the research procedures - Repeat observation and see if you can come up with the same common themes.
38
Q

What are some qualitative field research paradigms discussed in class?

A

-Naturalism
-Ethnomethodology
-Case studies
Data related to events or issues
Ex. Case study on Chilifest - Very descriptive, involves
social indicators to give explanation on what Chilifest is about
-Institutional ethnography
Classic ethnographies were conducted in villages of
Africa Researchers lived in these villages for prolonged
amount of time (years); most early ethnographers were
caucasian and very different from the people they were
studying
-Participatory action research
Doing research on a group of people who play a role in the experiment, know whats going on, and make observations for themselves.

39
Q

What preparations should be made for field research?

A
  • Be familiar with relevant research (existing literature) [have a general understanding of your subjects]
  • Discuss your plans with others in the area
-Identify and meet informants (when appropriate) - Sometimes, there are specific people that you want to develop close ties to; [Ex. Chief of village in an African group, customs you are unaware of, offensive behavior.]
     First impressions = important
     Establish rapport (an open and trusting relationship)

-Ethical considerations [When a problem is observed within the subjects that can be fixed with the researcher’s help, the researcher’s objective should adapt to the situation in an ethical manner.]

40
Q

What ethnographer is credited for the term “Cultural Relativism”?

A

Franz Boaz.
“..civilization is not something absolute, but… is relative, and… our ideas and conceptions are true only so far as our civilization goes.”

41
Q

Who took inuit people from the north pole and put them on display in the Smithsonian?

A

Franz Boaz

42
Q

Deductive reasoning

A

In deductive reasoning, a conclusion is reached from general statements.
Seen in experiments, surveys, and content analysis.

43
Q

Inductive Reasoning

A

Where a conclusion is reached from specific examples.

Seen in field research.

44
Q

What are the 7 stages in field research?

A
  1. Thematizing - Look at pre-existing literature and knowledge; recognize themes and commonalities that the researcher expects to see
  2. Designing - Very flexible; can come up with a series of themes and list of questions, but they may change during the interview/observation
  3. Interviewing
  4. Transcribing - Usually audio/visual, mostly audio–you want to transcribe audio bits; sometimes requires a translator in cross-cultural situations
  5. Analyzing - Read through stories and comments; listen again, watch again to find what themes are appearing; exclude the outlier – if you see one theme appear among 30 interviews, do not use it
  6. Verifying - If a researchers develops a sense of rapport, they have a better chance of being able to go back to the research site
     -Are these things happening normally?
     -Are these behaviors repeating and consistent  
     over time?
  7. Reporting - Write yo paper
45
Q

What are the Pros and Cons of Focus Groups?

A

Pros

  • Very flexible – can use a series of “probing” questions to get more detailed information
  • Real-life data
  • High degree of face validity – can be pretty confident that the things discussed are what are truly happening
  • Fast
  • Inexpensive

Cons

  • People are hesitant to share personal stories face to face
  • Even if they share, it’s a self-report – “socially desirable” and “normative” responses
  • Not representative
  • Limited to the types of people in those groups and non-random sample – cannot make generalizations
  • “Leader” and “passive” personalities – some people have a tendency to dominate conversations while others just follow along with the bandwagon
  • Little interviewer control
  • Difficult analysis – hard to analyze qualitative data; cannot collapse variables, calculate things, etc. and make definitive statements
  • Interviewer/moderator skills
  • Difficult logistically
46
Q

What are the strengths and weaknesses of qualitative field research?

A

Strengths

  • Effective for studying subtle nuances in attitudes and behaviors and social processes over time
  • Flexibility
  • Inexpensive

→ Greater validity than survey and experimental measurements

Weaknesses

  • No appropriate statistical analyses – although you find a common theme, there is no way to test it statistically
  • Potential problems with reliability
47
Q

Qualitative analysis

A

Qualitative analysis - the non-numerical examination and interpretation of observations, for the purpose of discovering underlying meanings and patterns of relationship

  • Field research is not representative – cannot take those findings and strongly generalize them to the population of interest
  • Inductive research – observing as objectively as possible to come up with a meaning
  • Discovering patterns - frequencies, magnitudes, structures, processes, causes, consequences
48
Q

Ground Theory Method

A

An inductive approach to research in which theories are generated solely from examination of other data rather than being derived deductively.

49
Q

Constant Comparative Method

A

A component of the Grounded Theory Method in which observations are compared with one another and with the evolving inductive theory – adding objectivity to the inductive method.

50
Q

What are the four stages of the Constant Comparative Method, and what are they used for?

A

Steps where we can keep referring to our observations to create order; come up with categories – themes are very common to field research

  1. Comparing incident application to each category
  2. Integrating categories and their properties
  3. Delimiting the theory
  4. Writing theory
51
Q

What is conversational Analysis, and what are its three fundamental assumptions?

A

Conversation analysis is a meticulous analysis of the details of conversation, based on a complete transcript that includes pauses, hems, and haws; studying how people talk

Fundamental assumptions:

  1. Conversation is socially constructed activity
  2. Conversations must be understood contextually
  3. Conversational analysis aims to understand the structure and meaning of conversation through excruciatingly accurate transcripts of conversations