EXAM 3 Flashcards

1
Q

Approaches to studying the mind– plato

A

memory works like a wax tablet
Recording information by engraving into soft wax
Information is engraved into physical tissue into the brain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Approaches to studying the mind– Aristotle

A

earning theory based on association
Both based their ideas on intuition, personal insight, logic and reasoning
Major concerns
Can lead to inaccurate conclusions
We can be biased by our intuitions and personal insights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Benefits of scientific approach

A

Based on observation rather than beliefs/intuitions
Involves care, systematic observation and comparison
Evaluate the reliability of findings
Evaluate the generalizability of findings
To what extent to our findings generalize to situations and samples beyond the data right in front of us
Seek to challenge ideas and disprove theories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Observational methods

A

Self reports
Case study– in depth examination of one or a few individuals
Naturalistic observation– provides insight on how everyday look
Experiments– dominant method in cog psych
Experiments are preferred because they allow for causal inferences– can infer whether a factors or interest causes an observed outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Key characteristics of an experiment

A

Manipulation of a factor of interest
Researcher changes/varies something
Random assignment of participants to conditions
(if comparing different groups)
Control of extraneous factors that are not of interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Quasi experiments

A

When it is not possible, practical, or ethical to have random assignment of participants to comparison conditions
Ex– sex, ethnicity, age, drugs, trauma
When you can’t assign people to groups
Limitations– need to be more cautious in making causal inferences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Non-experimental methods

A

Sometimes have to be used out of necessity
Can be good for generating hypotheses
Can be used to see if experimental results generalize

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Experimental moths

A

Good for testing hypothesis
Can infer provable causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Converging evidence

A

Seeing if different methods are pointing to the same conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Cycle of science form hypothesis

A

Running study again and again to see if you keep getting the same results
Continue asking followup questions, forming new hypotheses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Change blindness

A

inability to notice changes in our environment when we’re not actively focusing on them
(like in a show when you don’t notice the director made a mistake)
It’s like our attention acts like a spotlight, making us unaware of alterations in what we’re not focusing on.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Role of attention in perception

A

to notice and understand something around us, it’s not just about our senses picking it up. Our mind needs to be paying attention and open to receiving that information. Without paying attention, even if our senses detect something, we might not actually perceive or become aware of it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Attention

A

directing of our mental resources of the mind
Why we focus on some things and not others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Dichotic listening task

A

participants where stereo headphones (signal coming in one ear can be different of signal coming in other ear) and get one message in one ear that is the– intended message and another message in the other ear– unintended message they are supposed to tune out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Dichotic listening task conclusion

A

when people focus on one thing (like a voice in one ear), they only catch basic details (like whether it’s speech or noise) from the other ear. They don’t really process its meaning or details—it’s like it’s blocked from meaninful processing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

All or none processing theory

A

Info is either being focused on and undergoes full processing of meaning or if it is being ignored it undergoes no processing for meaning
Theory came from Cherry’s dichotic listening task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Focusing of Attention

A

Researchers seek to understand what happens when we try to focus on one task or one stream of info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Divided Attention

A

Researchers seek to understand what happens when we try to do multiple tasks or take in multiple streams at once

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Multi-Tasking

A

Issue of whether and to what degree performance in one or more of the tasks is completed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Performance Tradeoffs

A

When tasks compete or interfere with one another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Dividing attention is easier when

A

Some tasks have different or distinct resource requirements

if one task needs visual focus and another needs verbal thinking, it’s simpler to do both at the same time because they aren’t competing for the exact same mental abilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

When tasks have overlapping resource requirements

A

They compete for resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Allport et al. (1972)

A

when the tasks required distinct mental abilities (like listening and memorizing visual information), participants made fewer errors. Having tasks that demanded different types of mental resources reduced interference between them, making it easier for individuals to perform both tasks simultaneously without getting confused or making mistakes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Pashler (1989)

A

Performance tradeoffs of pressing buttons for different tones and vocally naming digits shown on a screen

Participants tended to respond faster when pressing buttons for tones compared to vocally naming digits on a screen. However, when it came to accuracy, vocal naming of digits tended to yield more precise responses compared to button pressing for tones.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Central Resource
mental capacity or processing power that's needed for various tasks. All tasks draw from this common pool of mental resources. When tasks require this shared mental capacity, they can "compete" for access to it
26
Control Mechanism
Control thoughts, keeps goals in mind, staying on task
27
With practice and experience there is a shift
From controlled to automatic processing, requiring less attentional resources when we're learning something new or unfamiliar, our brain uses controlled processing, which demands a lot of attention and mental effort. As we become more skilled or experienced, this task becomes automatic, requiring fewer attentional resources
28
Spelke et al. (1976)
Practice reading short stories for comprehension, dictation of words, no interference after about 6 weeks suggests that with enough practice, tasks that initially may interfere with each other can be successfully performed together without much difficulty.
29
Driving with cell phone use is equivalent to or worse than
Driving at the legal limit of alcohol use
30
Inattentional Blindness
when our focus is so fixed on one thing that we might not notice other stuff around us. It's like our attention gets overwhelmed, and because of that, we might miss things that are right in front of us missing entirely new or unexpected things
31
Can’t remember info unless
it has first been learned
32
How to test whether something has been learned
See if person has remembered/retained it
33
Experiments can infer
Causation
34
Learning Phase
Learn or encode the info or event
35
Test Phase
Complete a task or test in which retrieve the info or event
35
Retention Interval
Delay
36
Free Recall
Recall as many words as you can from the list you just saw
37
Cued Recall
Recall the word that started with “m” or recall the word that is a type of animal
38
Unconscious Memory
Unique methods in which learners are unaware memory is being examined
39
STM Characteristics
Duration – very limited, Capacity – very limited, Format – typically acoustic information is often stored in the form of sounds or auditory codes. people tend to remember things by mentally rehearsing or repeating them in their minds
40
LTM Characteristics
Duration – long-lasting, Capacity – high capacity, Format – typically semantic (meaning based)
41
Peterson & Peterson (1959)
Duration of STM, varied the retention interval to see how long the memory would last
42
Conrad (1964)
Acoustic Confusions happened with similair sounding words – “log” instead of “frog” Semantic Confusions happened with words with similair meanings – “toad” instead of “frog” short-term memory, errors often occur due to similarity in sound (acoustic) or meaning (semantic) between items being remembered.
43
Patient HM
Patient HM had severe epilepsy and underwent surgery where both his hippocampi were removed to stop the seizures. Before the surgery, his STM and LTM seemed fine. But after the operation, he struggled to form new long-term memories. This pattern was observed in similar patients too. They could remember recent things for a short while (STM), but couldn't turn these into long-lasting memories (LTM). This showed that the hippocampus plays a crucial role in transferring new memories from short-term to long-term storage.
44
Working Memory and STM Similarities
Both pertain to stuff you’re currently thinking about, dealing with form of memory that is proposed to be of very limited capacity and duration
45
Working Memory and STM Differences
STM holds info, WM holds and manipulates info, more flexibility with format
46
Simple Span Task
Only measure passive holding of info way to measure how much information you can hold in your short-term memory at once
47
Complex Span Tasks
Require holding and processing of info
48
Phonological Loop
Verbal and auditory info
49
Visuospatial Sketch Pad
Visual and spatial info
50
Motor skill requires
new learning and long-term memory
51
Repetition Priming
Shows long-term memory for the prior experience exposure to things makes it more accessible to our memory
52
Fragment Completion
Gave fragments that could be completed by earlier words Graf et al. (1985) – Free recall vs. fragment completion, poor memory when consciously trying to use memory, normal memory when not, dissociation different memory retrieval techniques or cues can significantly impact how well we can recall previously learned information
53
Explicit Memory
conscious, intentional recollection of past experiences and information used for recall and tests
54
Encoding
acquiring info and getting it into long term memory Processing occurring during exposure
54
Implicit Memory
Unconscious memory, memory without awareness, motor skills, repetition priming examples-- riding a bike, texting, brushing teeth, etc
55
Retrieval
process involved getting info out of LTM
56
Effect of simple exposure
Repeated exposure, even at very high levels, does not ensure that information will be well retained Passiving “soaking in” information through simple exposure is not an effective encoding activity for producing good long-term memory
57
Effects of simple repetition– craik and watkins
Repetition in the form of repeating information to yourself or re-reading Had people repeat target words as they came up Discovered simple repetition is not an effective coding strategy
58
Maintenance rehearsal
simple repetition of information Not effective
59
elaborative rehearsal
think of meaning, form meaningful connections effective
60
types of processing
Visual analysis ex– Is this word in uppercase or lowercase letters? or count the number of letters/vowels Sound based analysis– Does this word rhyme with this word? Meaning-based analysis– is a yacht a type of boat?
61
Research on type of processing– craik and tulving
found massive improvements when they are making judgments when words fit into complex sentences Elaborative processes– thinking about the meaning of information and linking what you are learning to other things is an effective approach
62
Retrieval processes
Sometimes memory performance is poor even when our process of remembering is done well This is because of retrieval failures
63
Brown and Kulik– Memory tied to major historical events (autobiographical memories)
Coined term flashbulb memory Memory when tied to emotional/shocking events is almost like a snapshot from a camera
64
memories for highly emotional events
are not perfectly preserved Emotion creates strong beleifs about memory, but not especially well preserved memories When memory fail us it does not just get fuzzy– it fails us in the sense that we report something, we think its accurate, but its not
65
Factor 1: Activations of Stored Information
Roediger & McDermott Presented related words, tested recognition later. 81% falsely recognized related but non-presented words. Holst & Pezdek Explored schemas (knowledge clusters). Participants listened to a robbery trial recording. Participants recalled schema-consistent elements not in the recording.
66
Factor 2: Exposure to Post-Event Information
Loftus & Palmer Showed a collision video. Changed wording in questions (hit vs. smashed). Word choice influenced memory of broken glass.
67
Factor 3: Thoughts and Imaginations
Loftus Interviewed parents about significant events. Presented false events among true ones. Later, asked to recall details; some created false memories.
68
Updated views of memory
Memory is dynamic– constantly changing Memory is integrative– mixing together process Memory is reconstructive– piecing together process Memory is subjective
69
Study strategies
Can't rely on - beliefs/intuition - Perceptions - Anecdotes Can rely on - Science of learning
70
Forming connections with a concept in the form of an example
improves memory
71
Elaboration by connecting to oneself– Rogers et al. 1977
Self-judgments: Does this word describe you? Findings: Self-reference doubled performance. Connecting information to one's life enhances memory. Self-Reference Effect: Not just linking to examples but relating information to one's own life. Enhances memory retention significantly.
72
elaboration by connecting to other knowledge
Connecting all forms of elaboration together Concepts build on one another
73
Elaborative interrogation
asking yourself why Way to get yourself to connect to other things you've been learning and already know Full letter grade improvement for why question group during experiment
74
Explanation for enhanced retrieval
Having all these connections gives you a higher set of cues By forming associations there are more retrieval routes Test question
75
Use of tests
2.5X more likely to remember tested info than restudied info Testing effect– advantage of practice testing Reusing the study time you would of used anyway to test yourself Tests can also serve as an effective learning tool by making it more memorable Only 11% of college students say they use practice testing as a strategy Big mismatch between people intuitions vs. reality and what science is telling us
76
Massed vs. Spaced Study
Massed study: Concepts studied back-to-back. Spaced study: Study sessions spread out. Beliefs vs. Reality: Belief: 93% of students think massed study is better. Reality: Studies show spaced study enhances learning. Spacing Effect: Spacing out study sessions boosts learning. Discrepancy: Intuition (massed study) doesn’t align with reality (spaced study)
77
Simple Span Tasks
Only measure passive holding of info
78
Complex Span Tasks
Require holding and processing of info
79
Motor skill requires
New learning and long-term memory
80
Humans as rational decision makers-- economist
rational decision makers We tend to make optimal choices that maximize value
81
Humans as rational decision makers-- Edwards
We act as intuitive staticians Intuitive– did not believe people were actually doing the math, he believed mentally we have intuitive capabilities that allow us to arrive at destinations that are in line with statistical rules We make decision consistent with statistical rules
82
Framing effect
framing (wording) things as gains vs. losses can switch the decision people make based on risks shows we are not always consistent
83
Algorithmic decision making
use systematic, step-by-step reasoning to make choices weighing pros and cons
84
Heuristic decision making
using mental shortcuts, rules of thumb Simple and efficient, but not foolproof Commonly used to estimate likelihoods
85
Availability heuristic
judge the likelihood of an event according to the ease with which examples come to mind Things that are more memorable, stand out, think of most readily
86
Representativeness heuristic
judge the likelihood of an event by how much is matches their preconceived notion of the even in notion We estimate events that match our stereotype to happen more commonly expect small samples to be representative of long-run outcomes
87
Importance of base rates in judgment
The size of the pools that your are comparing are different (first born child example)
88