Exam 3 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Can use however much reasonable appears necessary

A

non-deadly force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Only to prevent or end a dangerous felony involving risk to human life

A

Deadly force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Police encouraged or had defendant commit crime though they would not have done it themselves

A

Entrapment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Defendants predisposition to commit the crime.
The question goes to the?

A

Subjective Standard
Jury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Focus is on law enforcement officers activity.
Question goes to?

A

Objective Standard
Judge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

All evidence illegally obtained directly or indirectly must be excluded.

A

Exclusionary rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Weeks v. US, Silver Platter Problem, and Mapp v. Ohio are all examples of what

A

Exclusionary rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Arguments for the exclusionary rule are what

A

Judicial integrity and deterrent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Arguments against the exclusionary rule are what

A

States rights and “large cost”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What four places does the exclusionary rule not apply

A

Before trial proceedings, After trial, Civil cases, Admin agency hearings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Would have discovered the evidence regardless of the illegal conduct

A

Inevitable Discovery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Got evidence from an independent, untainted source not connected to the illegal activity

A

Independent Source

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How many exceptions/limits to the exclusionary rule are there

A

9

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Ill gotten evidence cannot be used to determine guilt or innocence but can be used to impeach the defendants credibility

A

Impeachment exception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

If state provides defendant with a hearing of an unreasonable search and seizure claim they cannot raise exclusionary questions again according to what

A

Post-Conviction Federal Habeas Corpus Proceeding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

If person acting independently of police direction, violates a persons fourth or fifth amendments rights, the court will not exclude the private party’s evidence

A

Private Party Searches

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Exclusionary rule does not apply where police act on an objectively reasonable belief that their conduct is not violating a defendants rights

A

Good faith exception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Us v. Leon is a case about

A

Good faith Exception

19
Q

Search does not violate the constitution but only violates the internal working rules of an agency

A

Agency Rule/ State law exception

20
Q

Fourth amendment provides that no warrant, search, or arrest shall be issued unless there is a what

A

Probable Cause

21
Q

What are the two prongs in the Aguilar/Spinelli test

A

Credibility/Reliability prong and Basis of knowledge prong

22
Q

Totality of the circumstances test is what test

A

Gates Test

23
Q

all searches and seizures should be reasonable

A

Reasonableness clause

24
Q

Explains how to get a valid warrant

A

Requirements Clause

25
Q

Taking a person into custody against his or her will

A

Arrest

26
Q

Any government intrusion upon a persons reasonable and justifiable expectation of privacy

A

Search

27
Q

An exercise of control by the government over a person or thing

A

Seizure

28
Q

What are the elements of a formal arrest

A

officer intends to arrest, comes from real or presumed authority, actual or constructive seizure of the person, and communication by the officer that the person is under arrest

29
Q

What can turn a detention into an arrest

A

Length of seizure, intensity of the intrusion, movement of the suspect, and location of the seizure

30
Q

Police have the authority to detain a person briefly for questioning even without probably cause to believe that the person committed a crime

A

Stop and Frisk

31
Q

What are the three valid factors of a stop and frisk

A

Observe unusual conduct, leading to a reasonable suspicion that criminal activity may be a foot, and the officers ability to point to specific and articulable facts to justify that suspicion

32
Q

Less than probable cause, but more than mere/vague suspicion

A

Reasonable suspicion

33
Q

An investigatory stop must be temporary and no longer than necessary to satisfy or dispel suspicions

A

Scope and Duration

34
Q

May pat down a persons outer clothing for weapons, provided the officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous

A

Frisk

35
Q

Written order, based on probably cause, issued by a magistrate telling officers to arrest a particular person

A

Arrest warrant

36
Q

Written order telling the person to appear in court at a stated day and time

A

Summons

37
Q

In MN, the person must be brought before the magistrate within how many hours?

A

36 hours

38
Q

Routine searches by government agents at an international border or its equivalent

A

Border searches

39
Q

Can stop vehicles and question occupants if the officer has reasonable suspicion that said vehicle contains an illegal immigrant

A

Roving Patrols

40
Q

Can stop vehicles and question occupants with a reasonable suspicion

A

Permanent checkpoints

41
Q

Government inspectors must have a warrant to search private residences and commercial buildings

A

Administrative Searches

42
Q

Before beginning any search, police must have probably cause to believe that auto contains fruits, instrumentalities, or evidence of a crime or contraband

A

Probably cause requirement

43
Q

What are the four key questions raised by Miranda

A

Were the warnings given? Is the defendant in custody? Were the defendants statements made in response to interrogation? Can the confession be used for impeachment purposes

44
Q

Getting an inmate to do their questioning for them

A

Jailhouse informers