Exam 3 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Definition of Privacy

A

The right to be let alone & The right to control personal information about oneself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 4 torts of privacy and their defense?

A
1. Intrusion
     • No Defense - Same as Trespass 
2. Public Disclosure of Embarrassing Private Facts
     • Defense: Newsworthiness
3. False Light
     • Defense: Actual Malice 
4. Appropriation
     • Defense: Consent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Facts of Dietemann v. Time

A

• (Intrusion) Two Lifetime reporters targeted A. A. Dietemann, a disabled Veteran who claimed to heal people with herbs and other remedies
• They entered his home, posing as patients, using a hidden bowtie camera and a hidden microphone to record the conversation
* Published materials in the magazine and turned over to district attorney who sued Dietemann for practicing medicine without a license.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Decision of Dietemann v. Time

A

The Court of Appeals upheld the $1,000 award in damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Reasoning for Dietemann v. Time

A
  • When Life magazine misrepresented themselves to get access to Dietemann’s home, it doesn’t negate the fact that it is your home, the ultimate sphere of solitude.
  • The use of cameras is protected by the first amendment but the fact that they were hidden was the problem and thus not protected
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Facts of Sidis v. F-R Publishing

A
  • William Sidis was an unwilling subject of a brief biographical sketch and cartoon that was printed in The New Yorker
  • Graduated from Harvard at 16 and was a child prodigy.
  • The New Yorker published an article titled ‘Where are they now?’
  • Reporters found him living in obscurity, and working as a grocery store clerk.
  • Sidis sued them under the second tort
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Decision of Sidis v. F-R Publishing

A
  • The Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the decision siding with the New Yorker Magazine
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Reasoning of Sidis v. F-R Publishing

A
  • Sidis was a public figure when he was a child prodigy.

* He would always be considered a public figure, despite his effort to remain out of the public eye

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Facts of Cox Broadcasting v. Cohn

A
  • 17 year old student was sexually assaulted at a party and later died in Sandy Springs, Georgia
  • 7 months later six boys were charged with her rape and murder though the trial judge dropped the murder charge.
  • Thomas Wassell, a reporter for WSB-TV obtained the copy of the indictment and later broadcasted the girls name while reporting
  • Martin Cohn, the victims father, sued both WSB and the reporter. Claiming it violated Georgia’s shield law and his right for privacy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Decision of Cox v. Cohn

A

Supreme Court ruled 8-1 in favor of Cox Broadcasting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Reasoning of Cox v. Cohn

A
  • Since the reporter legitimately obtained the name in a public document in open court, the court held that later publication of the name was an activity protected by the first amendment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Facts of Time v. Hill

A
  • James Hill and his family were taken hostage in their own home by three escaped convicts
  • They were held for 19 hours.
  • Joseph Hayes wrote a book called The Desperate Hours, influenced by the family’s ordeal.
  • The book was turned into a production though it portrayed the family being threatened with sexual abuse and other violent acts
  • Life Magazine published an article of the productions debut.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Decision of Time v. Hill

A
  • Court determined a 5-4 decision in favor of Time, Inc.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Reasoning of Time v. Hill

A

*The Hill family couldn’t prove actual malice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The strength of Newsworthiness as a defense

A
  • There are certain types of information that are so private and personal that it’s no one’s business but your own
  • If put out there, it would highly embarrass or humiliate said person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the Common Decency Standard

A

The private information disclosed about the plaintiff, by the press defendant, violates the common decency as perceived by people of ordinary sensibilities

17
Q

What is the Chilling Effect?

A

If enough reporters burn their anonymous sources, and provide the authorities with the anonymous news source, it can have a chilling effect on the news media. It entails a lack of trust in our credibility

18
Q

Define Subpoena

A

Legal mechanism authorities use, compelling by force of law of the press to give the names of their anonymous sources

19
Q

Define Civil Contempt

A

A judge hands down a subpoena to a reporter and a reporter refuses to obey the direct court order to turnover their sources name

20
Q

Define Criminal Contempt

A

Someone in the courtroom insulting the dignity of the court (judge, jury, witness, etc.), verbally or engaging in any act of obstruction of justice

21
Q

Define Direct Criminal Contempt

A

Someone in the courtroom insulting the dignity of the court during the trial and the judge has firsthand knowledge of the insult that has occurred

22
Q

Define Indirect Criminal Contempt

A

The insult to the dignity of the court occurs outside of the courtroom by someone connected to the case, the judge has secondhand knowledge of the insult

23
Q

Facts of Branzburg v. Hayes

A
  • Paul Branzburg a reporter of The Courier witnessed people manufacturing and using hashish.
  • Wrote two articles concerning drug use. (included unidentified hands pictures and marijuana users as sources)
  • Earl Caldwell, a reporter for the Times conducted extensive interviews with the leaders of the Black Panthers
  • Paul Pappas, a Massachusetts tv reporter, spent several hours in the Black Panthers headquarters
24
Q

Decision of Branzburg v. Hayes

A

Court ruled 5-4 against the existence of reportorial privilege in the Press Clause of the First Amendment

25
Q

Reasoning of Branzburg v. Hayes

A
  • White acknowledged the argument that refusing to recognize such a privilege would undermine the ability of the press to gather news
  • They had information about individuals that they could hand over to the authorities to help land indictments against the people doing these crimes
26
Q

What are the three parts of the Qualified Privilege Test

A
  1. Probable Cause
    • To show the reporter has possession of information of the commission of a crime
  2. Info can’t be obtained via any other means
    • No other methods the authorities could get the information that the reporter has
  3. Compelling and Overriding Interest
    • The information is really important that the authorities need and the reporters have it
27
Q

Facts of Irvin v. Dowd

A
  • Centered around a series of murders
  • Local police arrested Leslie Irvin, announcing he had confessed to the crimes
  • Irvin’s lawyers sought a change of venue to avoid local biases, but they lost
  • Was sentenced to death
  • Escaped and soon recaptured, court rejected his motion for appeals
28
Q

Decision of Irvin v. Dowd

A

Brought a 5-4 majority for the liberals

29
Q

Reasoning for Irvin v. Dowd

A
  • Brennan wrote an opinion forcing the state of Indiana to consider Irvin’s appeal on the basis of the jury issue
30
Q

What is Prejudicial Publicity?

A

Pre trial, the press discloses information about a crime and about the background of the criminal defendant that might taint the verdict

31
Q

Waht are the procedural safeguards of law?

A
  1. Voir Dire
    • The Jury Selection Process
  2. Change of Venue
    • Location of the trial held in a different part of the state
  3. Change of Venire
    • Stays in same jurisdiction
  4. Continuance
    • Judge delays trial start
  5. Gag Order
  6. Closure order
32
Q

What is Trial by Newspaper?

A

The press convicting the defendant before he’d even been arrested.

33
Q

Facts of Sheppard v. Maxwell

A

Dr. Sheppard was convicted of murdering his wife by bludgeoning her to death

Challenged the verdict as product of an unfair trial because there was a wide spread broadcast of his trial

Trial by Newspaper.

34
Q

Decision of Sheppard v. Maxwell

A

8-1 Decision for Sheppard

35
Q

Reasoning of Sheppard v. Maxwell

A

Found that he did not receive a fair trial. Murder charge was overturned

Should have a new trial in a less violent atmosphere.

Found not guilty for the murder.