Exam 2: Textbook Notes Flashcards
1
Q
Effective Interviewing Techniques (2) children
A
- NICDH
- avoid: close ended, and suggestive questions
- intro phase, rapport-building phase, substantive phase - Step-Wise Interview
- designed to maximize accurate info and minimize contamination of info
- general to specifici
2
Q
Courtroom accommodation for children (4)
A
- Supportive adult of child’s choosing
- Videotapes pretrial interview
- Imposing a publication ban on courtroom proceedings
- Closing courtroom to media and public
Others: one-way screen, CCTV, hearsay, etc.
3
Q
Research in Implanting false memories (4)
A
- Little effort needed
- Visual imagery is powerful
- Expectations are powerful
- Real cases: process is longer & has more pressure
4
Q
Explanations that exist for forgetting memories (3)
A
- Transience if memory (forgetting over time)
- More likely to forget if trusted caretaker or family member
- Individual differences (some people better at keeping unpleasant memories at bay, etc.)
5
Q
Criteria for evaluating claims of recovered memories of abuse (5)
A
- Techniques: coercive or suggestive?
- Began as vague images/feelings and not clear, detailed memories
- Extend into adolescence
- Involve abuse occurring before 3 years of age
- Rare forms of abuse
6
Q
Categories of offences in the Canadian Criminal Code (3)
A
- Summary offences: less serious; lower courts, no juries
- Indictable offences: more serious; higher courts with juries
- Hybrid offences: majority of other offences
7
Q
Characteristics of the jury (3)
A
- Representativeness
- Impartiality
- Competence
8
Q
Sources of juror partiality (4)
A
- Interest prejudice: result of direct interest in case
- Specific prejudice: attitudes/ beliefs about specific case
- Generic prejudice: general attitudes
- Normative prejudice: community interest in case affects juror
9
Q
Ways to handle pre-trial juror partiality (3)
A
- Adjournment
- Change of venue
- Challenge of cause
10
Q
Studying juries (3)
A
- Mock trials
- Archival records
- USA: post-trial interviews
11
Q
Ways of viewing the jury decision making process
A
- Mathematical
2. Story
12
Q
Effect of jury being exposed to inadmissible evidence (3)
A
- Verdicts consistent with slants of evidence
- Instruction to ignore does not eliminate its impact
- Instruction to ignore sometimes inflates it’s impact
13
Q
Stages of deliberation process (3)
A
- Orientation stage
- Open-conflict stage
- Reconciliation stage