Exam 2 Material Flashcards

1
Q

SSA- Significant Scientific Agreement

A

experts would likely agree that the scientific evidence supports the substance-disease relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

totality of evidence

A

a structured review of literature or ALL relevant evidence, based on HUMAN studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

systemic Approach

A

a methodical, consistent approach is applied to substantiate a health claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

transparency

A

search strategies, literature selection and evaluation are fully disclosed, to increase the credibility of the document and permit reproducibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

comprehensiveness

A

all original research in humans is captured including evidence in favour and not in favour of the health claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

human evidence

A

the focus is on original research in humans that measure the food and health effect of interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

convincing level of certainty

A

the majority of high-quality human studies support a statistically significant favourable effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Demonstrations of Causality

A

Considers the quality and quantity of human research that support a beneficial effect of the food and the relationship between the amount of the food and the health effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Biological Relevance of the Claimed Effect

A

To ensure biological relevance, surrogate markers of the claimed effect must have both methodological validity and biological evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Feasibility of consumption of effective dose

A

The amount of food to be consumed to achieve a beneficial effect can be incorporated into a healthy, balanced diet by the target population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Cell Culture- Main Advantages

A
  • Consistency (in populations)
  • Reproducibility
  • Cost: low (compared to other methods)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Cell Culture- Main Disadvantages

A
  • Lack of complexity

- Cells can acquire multiple mutations after successive passages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Cell Culture Models- PROS

A
  • Investigate possible functional mechanisms
  • Inexpensive, easy to perform
  • Within the same cell line, should be easy to replicate
  • May help identify future biomarkers
  • Good control over experimental conditions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Cell Culture Models - CONS

A
  • May not be relevant to a living organism, especially human
  • Some cell lines difficult to maintain (repeatability between primary culture- especially human)
  • May not take into account interactions between cell types and tissues: non-physiological
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Animal Models - PROS

A
  • Shows effect on whole organism
  • Can make more invasive measurements and measure toxicity
  • Highlight mechanisms
  • Lifespan studies
  • Very tightly controlled conditions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Animal Models - CONS

A
  • Effect in animals does not necessarily reflect same effect in humans
  • Dose in animals not necessarily comparable to humans
  • Dietary or other intervention may not be realistic
17
Q

Human Observational Studies -PROS

A
  • Shows effects in humans
  • Can use large population
  • Can study multiple outcomes
  • Can establish a temporal relationship
  • Cheaper than clinical trial
18
Q

Human Observational Studies- CONS

A
  • Identify associations only (does not prove causation)
  • Difficult to remove confounders
  • Advanced statistical methods required
19
Q

Human Intervention Studies- PROS

A
  • Only study that is able to show cause and effect

- Conclusively measure safety and efficacy, which is ultimately the primary goal of FFN research

20
Q

Human Intervention Studies- CONS

A
  • Expensive
  • Ethical considerations
  • Compliance
  • Often invasive
21
Q

Cancer

A
Uncontrolled growth of abnormal cells
-	Caused by genetic mutations 
       Gain of function 
       Loss of function 
       Change in metabolism
22
Q

tumour

A

formed by abnormal cells

23
Q

Benign

A

atypical cells without metastatic properties

24
Q

Pre-malignant

A

altered cells capable of becoming malignant

25
Q

malignant

A

an abnormal cell that has gained the capacity to migrate

26
Q

Hallmarks of Cancer

A
  1. Sustaining proliferative signalling
  2. Evading growth suppressors
  3. Resisting cell death
  4. Enabling replicative immortality
  5. Inducing angiogenesis
  6. Activating invasion and metastasis
  7. Re-programming energy metabolism
  8. Evading immune destruction
  9. Genome instability that provides mutations
  10. Inflammation
27
Q

Coffee protects against:

A
endometrial 
liver and biliary tract
gallbladder
oral and pharyngeal
prostate
skin 
breast 
colorectal