Exam 2 (Days 8-12) Flashcards

1
Q

Integrity

A

The willingness to conduct one’s self in accord with principles that promote fairness to all

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Business Ethics

A

The study of how to properly use one’s economic and professional power with integrity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Ethics

A

the study of Integrity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Cheating

A

The giving of less than fairly due while expecting the same reward as those who gave what was due.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Protected Classes

A

For these, an employer must be prepared to prove, for any discharge, for any reason, that it is not driven by discrimination.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

not a protected class

A

Under US law, every American is in a protected class except non-disabled, non-gender diverse Caucasian males between the age of 18 and 40.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Disparate treatment

A

this is created by deliberate acts that deny protected classes access to the workplace

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Disparate impact

A

this is created by common business practices that negatively impact protected classes

Most discrimination suits today

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why is discrimination an ethical issue

A
  1. Inclusion in “Protected Classes” has expanded to include most Americans.
  2. The categories for “discrimination victim” expand every year.
  3. The meaning of disability is constantly expanding
  4. The meaning of BFOQ can be subjective and hard to apply.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Bona Fide Occupational Qualifier

BFOQ

A

Through this, an employer can argue that a job, to be properly done, must require certain abilities on the part of the employee; but the burden of proof is on the employer

UPS case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

two forms of sexual harassment

A
  1. The linkage, quid pro quo, of sexual activity to work place privileges
  2. The presence of a hostile work environment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A Quid Pro Quo Harassment Claim must be able to prove the following elements to a jury:

A
  1. The alleged harasser, an officer or employee of company X, suggested or requested a personal relationship with the plaintiff.
  2. The request was linked to the granting of certain job benefits or even the possibility of employment or continued employment.
  3. At the time of the conduct, the alleged harasser was a supervisor or agent for company X.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Workplace Possessiveness

A

Like workplace bullying, this can involve co-workers, create psychological harm and even the threat of physical harm.

This can express itself as quid pro quo harassment, physical stalking, e-stalking, restructured work assignments (possibly involving travel with the harasser) and revenge (If you don’t like me I’ll make it so no one ever likes you.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson

A

This established the principle that an employer is liable for quid pro quo sexual harassment even if the victim prefers not to report it until a lawsuit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The Meritor v. Vinson Perspective

A

Employers must prepare for the unexpected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Hostile work environment

A

This is created by unwelcome verbal or physical conduct directed at race, color, religion, gender identity, national origin, age (40 and over), disability (mental or physical), sexual orientation, or retaliation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Robinson v. Jacksonville Shipyards

A

This case established the principle that an employer is liable for sexual harassment even if the victim suffers no psychological harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

The elements of a hostile work environment complaint

A
  1. There is no quid pro quo
  2. It can be employee to employee
  3. The employer is liable even if unaware or not involved
  4. The lack of preventive policies increase the awarded damages.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

The Tail Hook Scandal

A

100 U.S. Navy and Marine aviation officers were alleged to have sexually assaulted 83 women

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Bullying in the workplace

A

A violation of the

Social Contract

21
Q

Goal Driven

Workplace Bullying

A

In this the purpose of the bullying is to drive someone from the workplace.

22
Q

Friedrich Nietzsche in: The Will to Power

A

Argued that the most fundamental human need is to possess and control

23
Q

Psychologically Driven

Workplace Bullying

A

In this the purpose of the bullying is to express power

24
Q

Workplace bullying
differs from
“schoolyard” bullying
in three ways

A
  1. It is goal driven rather than psychologically driven.
  2. It is more subtle. It operates within the established rules and policies of both the organization and existing laws.
  3. In most cases the bully (bullies) is not a peer but a boss or a manager.
25
Actionable
Conduct that crosses the line between something formal laws will ignore and something they won’t.
26
six elements most commonly found in cases of bullying
1. Disproportionate power 2. A disregard for one’s personhood 3. An absence of individuals able or willing to defend the victim 4. A conscious effort on the part of the bully to not empower the victim with a legal recourse 5. A disregard for one’s property 6. A disregard for one’s rights
27
Plato’s Euthyphro
The oldest recorded case of Whistleblowing This can also be regarded as the oldest example of an ethical dilemma
28
Problem Reporting
In this an employee who discovers organizational misconduct chooses to bring it to the attention of his or her immediate supervisor
29
Whistleblower
In this an employee who discovers organizational misconduct chooses to bring it to the attention of someone other than his or her immediate supervisor
30
Internal Whistleblowing
This occurs when an employee discovers organizational misconduct and brings it to the attention of a company official, who then follows established procedures to address the misconduct within the organization
31
External Whistleblowing
When an employee discovers organizational misconduct and chooses to bring it to the attention of law enforcement agencies and/or the media.
32
The moral question in whistleblowing
Why did the employee who discovered organizational misconduct choose not to bring it to the attention of his or her supervisor. – skip the normal procedure of problem reporting?
33
The five factors that characterize | Whistle-blowing
1. The problem harms or potentially harms people. 2. The problem has been documented, it is real. 3. Efforts to internally resolve the problem have been exhausted. 4. The communication of the problem ignores normal channels. 5. There is the belief the act of reporting will resolve the problem.
34
When is Whistle-Blowing Unethical?
Whistle-blowing must be questioned if: - Motivation is the opportunity for financial gain or media attention - Employee is carrying out a vendetta against the company - - Key point –be very sure that your facts and your evidence is irrefutable before blowing the whistle
35
The two factors that make whistleblowing unethical
1. It is done only for financial reward or media attention. | 2. It is done as an act of revenge.
36
The two devices companies primarily use to contain whistle-blowing
1. Confidentiality agreements. | 2. The threat of a “tortious interference” suit directed at media seeking to cover the problem.
37
Tortious Interference
``` A legal term defining conduct aimed at creating either public or judicial prejudice against a party in a lawsuit seeking compensatory damages. ```
38
Ground
A statement or set of statements That can be held as incontestably valid.
39
a posteriori
that which is known with certainty by the senses objective knowledge only exists when all observers experience the same IF – THEN Conditions knowledge gained “from after” birth
40
a priori
that which is known with certainty by inference tied to understanding and ground knowledge gained “from before” birth i.e. innate common sense This relates to those things we can know with certainty when we have no causal influence affecting our senses.
41
Analogical Inference
The justification of a claim based upon a comparison of traits or circumstances.
42
Phenomenology
The study of appearances to the mind
43
Phenomenon
The object as it appears to the mind | Phenomena is the plural
44
Epistemology
the study of knowledge and the use of logic to achieve certainty
45
Skepticism
the view that religious and metaphysical knowledge is always tentative Plato argued against skepticism using the doctrine of Moral intellectualism
46
Moral intellectualism
Morality is inherently rational and objective
47
Voluntarism
Rulers use religion to create moral principles so the society can be controlled Rulers use religion or government to create moral principles to better control society
48
Intellectualism
Morality is inherently rational and objective