Exam 2: Chapter 2 Flashcards
The Scoville scale
is a psychophysical scale that measures our experience of piquancy or “hotness”. The more capsaicin is present in a particular food, the spicier it will taste.
Scoville scale:
a measure of our detection of the amount of an ingredient called capsaicin in chili peppers.
Capsaicin:
the active ingredient in chili peppers that provides the experience of hotness, piquancy, or spiciness.
Psychophysical scale:
a scale on which people rate their psychological experiences as a function of the level of a physical stimulus.
Scales are used to match changes in the physical amount of a stimulus with corresponding psychological changes in perception of the stimulus. Most often not linear.
exceptions: lines; coldness
Method of limits:
Stimuli are presented in a graduated scale, and participants must judge the stimuli along a certain property that goes up or down.
Method of constant stimuli:
a method whereby the threshold is determined by presenting the observer with a set of stimuli, some above threshold and some below it, in a random order.
Method of adjustment:
a method whereby the observer controls the level of the stimulus and “adjusts” it to be at the perceptual threshold.
Magnitude estimation:
a psychophysical method in which participants judge and assign numerical estimates to the perceived strength of a stimulus.
Signal detection theory:
the theory that in every sensory detection or discrimination, there is both sensory sensitivity to the stimulus and a criterion used to make a cognitive decision.
Catch trial:
a trial in which the stimulus is not presented – used to check a study participant’s accuracy and honesty.
Forced-choice method:
a psychophysical method in which a participant is required to report when or where a stimulus occurs instead of whether it was perceived. Technique prevents the need for catch trials because the observer can’t say yes in every trial, regardless of the presence of a stimulus.
Psychophysics:
study of the mathematical relationship between magnitude changes in physical stimuli and the resulting psychological perception
Detection:
minimum intensity that we can perceive (absolute thresholds)
example) a dog can smell blood better than a human
Discrimination:
minimum change in stimulus need to separate two stimuli (difference thresholds)
(looking at the change)
Scaling:
correlation of changes in magnitude between physical stimulus and psychological experience
sensation magnitude vs stimulus intensity graph
exponent is <1: exponential increase (example: electric shock- has a survival value)
exponent =1: linear (apparent length)
exponent < 1: concave ( brightness) (I think this is similar for audio and visual)
—visian and sound are NONlinear
when take the log: the electric shock will be greatest intensity
we think the curve is like this so we can see a wieder range of stimulus
Absolute threshold:
minimum of a stimulus required for detection
-of humans- no cut off point
look @ 50% mark for where can detect stimulus – finding the middle range
differing values for the threshold indicate that humans have top-down processing
see graph- be able to find on graph
can find experimentally through the method of descending limits: ex) making each light dimmer
—–method of limits
or methods of constant stimuli
theoretical threshold
stepwise- what a machine would give (ideal)
The method of limits
The participant must decide if a stimulus is present at a number of different levels of intensity. The stimulus is increased in even trials and decreased in odd trials. A Y indicates that the participant detects the stimulus, whereas an N indicates that the participant does not detect the stimulus.
The estimate of the threshold is considered to be the mean crossover point.
Threshold = mean crossover = 4.5
Average result of ascending and descending trails for absolute threshold
Ascending and Descending trials; errors of habituation and anticipation (subject learns pattern)
Difference threshold (the JND) Ascending series and Descending series Crossover point Two-point touch threshold
Difference threshold (JND):
Just-noticeable difference (JND), or the smallest difference between two stimuli that can be detected.
Ascending series:
a series in which a stimulus gets increasingly larger along a physical dimension.
start with canNOT see the light, until they can
note: will get slightly different answers between ascending and descending series
Descending series:
a series in which a stimulus gets increasingly smaller along a physical dimension.
start with a bright light and lower intensity
problem: can figure out the pattern; decreasing at a regular rate
note: will get slightly different answers between ascending and descending series
Crossover point:
the point at which a person changes from detecting to not detecting a stimulus or vice versa.
Two-point touch threshold:
the minimum distance at which two touches are perceived as two touches and not one.
Method of Constant Stimuli:
a way to measure absolute threshold
range of detectable and undetectable stimuli presented in random order
RANDOM stimuli - taking away the predictability
(this is different than the method of limits)
Fewer errors due to random procedure
Time consuming and subject may experience fatigue or boredom- try to reduce stimulus range to those values just around the threshold
—can reduce this by giving the participants a break
The threshold is the stimulus magnitude that the subject detected 50% of the time for that particular magnitude. The threshold is the value with 50% Yes and 50% No responses.
In this example, the light intensity value of 180 was detected 50% of the time when a value of 180 was presented to the subject. The value of 200 always produced a Yes response while 150 never got a Yes response.
The findings of absolute thresholds supports _________
top-down processing. A machine would have the same ‘cut-off’ regardless of direction and would give a graph like (a). But humans give a graph like (b).
FIGURE 2.6 Measuring Threshold
These graphs illustrate how we measure the threshold in psychophysical experiments. In Figure 2.6a, we see a hypothetical cutoff at a particular level of intensity that separates the stimulus level at which we see the stimulus and the stimulus level at which we do not see the stimulus. Figure 2.6b illustrates that in most cases, thresholds vary from trial to trial, and we must estimate the threshold from the point at which participants are 50% likely to say “saw it” and 50% likely to say “didn’t see it.”