Exam 2 Flashcards
Transcortical sensory aphasia
A fluent aphasia with preserved repetition.
- usually associated with damage to angular gyrus which isolates wernickes area by cutting off association fibers
- damage is to the watershed regions of upper parietal
- conversation speech is fluent and filled with neologistic or semantic jargon
- their ability to repeat words accurately is surprising. No press on speech like with wernickes aphasia
- comprehension is severely disturbed
- when they repeat they don’t understand what they are saying (like a parrot talking)
- naming is defective
What is transcortical motor aphasia?
A non-fluent aphasia with preserved repetition
- brain damage is usually in the dorsalateral frontal cortex. Can affect association fibers (white matter) isolates the language center from other areas of the brain
- repetition is fine but spontaneous speech is impaired
- utterances may be preservative and not finished
- comprehension can be functional
- seem distant and difficult to engage in conversation
- show little interest in using language
Transcortical mixed aphasia
A global aphasia with relatively preserved repetition
- damage involves both anterior and posterior portions do watershed areas
- primary cause is stenosis (blockage of internal carotid artery)
Define Primary progressive aphasia
Definition: a language deficit of insidious onset, gradual progression, and prolonged course, in absence of generalized cognitive impairments due to a degenerative disease, predominantly and presumable involving the left perisylvian region of the brain(Duffy 1987)
-gradual progression mirrors degenerative diseases but cognitive abilities are intact, just language is impaired
Primary progressive aphasia clinical presentation
-these patients rarely deny their deficits
-usually initiate the search for diagnosis and management
-these patients due not observe memory disturbances unrelated to verbal functions
-no personality changes
Word finding issues & other language problems are present
-different from dementia because there is no concern over memory, personality, or orientation
-due to an unknown condition in the language center
Language confusion
This is a language impairment that is usually caused by diffuse bilateral trauma to the brain, such as from head injury, toxic conditions, post surgical stress, or related events
- typically patients show normal syntax, semantics, and phonology, but the context of their language is confused and confabulatory
- in most cases the onset is sudden
Language confusion vs. aphasia
- patients with LOC have language abilities that are better than their ability to communicate
- aphasia patients language abilities are worse than their abilities to communicate
- LOC – language is good their just not in our context/reality
Sub cortical aphasia
- damage to sub cortical structures and white matter
- associated with damage to the basal ganglia
- there is controversy about whether us cortical structures like the thalamus have a direct role in our language abilities
- nevertheless, language deficits have been associated with subcritical brain damage
Aphasia battery tests: BDAE 3
Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination 3rd edition
- there are 5 subsections: 1. Conversational speech, 2. Auditory comprehension, 3. Oral expression, 4. Reading, 5. Writing (plus a section on apraxia)
- it is norm-referenced, standardized test with norms for both aphasic subjects and normal subjects
- total administration time is about 2 hours +
- has a separate naming test
- included supplementary non-language tests such as R/L orientation, and a acalculia
- provides a profile of patient scores that can help in the classification of major aphasic syndromes (types)
Aphasia tests: Western aphasia battery
- Similar in content & purpose of BDAE
- The first four sections examine oral language abilities
- The final four sections examine reading, writing, apraxia, & arithmetic
- This test will give a summary score, which is useful in documenting progress in treatment. The most commonly used score is the aphasia quotient score (AQ)
- the AQ is the summary score for the oral language abilities section of the test
- the highest AQ score is 100, meaning either normal language performance or only mildest of impairment
Boston naming test
- assesses name retrieval
- contains 60 items of progressive difficulty
- ceiling of 8 consecutive errors
- most useful for patients with mild naming problems
- usually used as a criterion referenced test
Overview of aphasia treatment
- clinical treatment has its limits
- treatment is not limited to speech & language
- aphasia tx must be structured (repetition)
- no single set of tasks or procedures is adequate tx (should be dynamic)
- aphasia tx exploits strengths
- *clients need to be trained to be their own clinicians
- involve others
- many patients take their moods from clinicians
3 goals of aphasia treatment
- To assist people to regain as much communication as their brain damage allows, and their needs drive them to
- To help them to learn how to compensate for residual deficits
- To help them learn to live in harmony with the difference between the way they were and the way they are
* *the first two can be acquired through clinical practice and reading books
* *the third is gained through experience and maturity
* *the overall goal of treatment is to prepare an aphasic patient for a lifetime of aphasia
What do I treat?
Relative Level of Impairment
- Look at testing to determine which areas are strengths and weaknesses
- According to porch (1981) treat those specific areas that are slight to moderate impairment
- If scores of subtests are dramatically treat that area until variability decreases and treatment has approached the patients recovery potential
- Choosing a goal based on how severe patient is
What do I treat? Fundamental Processes Approach
-Treat those areas that are thought to be the underlying cause of aphasia impairments–> what areas of language will make the most difference in their life
Ex: treating auditory comprehension in aphasia, as it improves so will so will general communicative ability as the improvement generalizes
-choosing a goal that is most functional for patient
What do I treat? Activity participation approach or functional approaches
- views the purpose of intervention as helping the patients overall success with communication in natural settings
- choose a targeted life activity
- ex: talking on the phone &treatment specifically targets skills related to this skill. - impairment–>word retrieval issues
- activity–>ordering a cheeseburger
- participation–> engage in task with other people
- *what is the final objective of my tx?
What does therapy look like?
- In a more structured therapy session treating specific impairments:
- *opening–> conversation
- *accommodation –> familiar tasks, high success
- *goal directed therapy–> challenging, tx goal oriented tasks
- *cool down–> easy tasks, high success
- *closing–> conversation
- in activity: participation approach, treatment follows similar pattern but it is slightly less structured, clinician coaches patient in more every day activities
Choosing stimuli
Resource allocation: help patient toward behavior by eliminating process load (mental capacity)
Stimulus manipulation: intensity (strength ex:auditory how loud) vs. salience (how stimulus stands out)
Clarity/Intelligibility: line drawings may be uncertain
Redundancy/context: redundancy increases the performance of brain injured adults (ex: show me the small red cups vs. show me the cup that is small & red) context is the background or setting
Novelty/interest value: patients respond better to more personally interesting items
Cues: hints given by the clinician when a patient produces an incorrect response
Cueing hierarchy (in order of decreasing power)
- Imitation
- First sound/syllable
- Sentence completion
- Word spelled aloud
- Rhyme
- Synonym/Antonym
- Function/Location (drink it at breakfast)
- Superordinate (it’s something you drink)
How else can a clinician control tx difficulty level?
- Manipulate the length & complexity or responses require sentence length, increased syntactic demand, ect
- Manipulate familiarity & meaningfulness of responses –alter questions making them more or less personal
- Manipulate delay–adding a time delay may increase difficulty of a task
Giving instructions & feedback
-Instructions: clear & concise at an adequate rate for the patient using language the patient understands
-feedback: incentive feedback–> can maintain or eliminate behavior (candy/electric shock)
Informative feedback: tells patient about the accuracy of response
full strength praise (great job) vs. diluted negative feedback (close, but lets do it again)
Generalization
Use of natural maintenance–>hello/goodbye are naturally reinforced by others in daily lives
Teach the same pattern of response in different settings–>office, home, restaurants
Loose training–> teaching with a variety of stimulus items to promote generalization
Sequential Modification–> training targets in every setting generalization is desired
Programming common stimuli–> making the environment you train look like those you wish to generalize
Mediating generalization–> using mnemonic devices visualization a to train the patient to cue themselves
Training generalization–> spontaneous generalization that occurs during tx activities
Treatment of Auditory Comprehension
- Single-Word Comprehension
- Understanding verbal sentences
- Answering questions
- Following verbal directions
- sentence verification (yes/no)
- Tasking switching drills: point to___, pick up___, which one do you write with? We’re you born in Fresno?
- Comprehension of Conversation: higher level
- yes/no questions
- retelling a conversation
- open ended questions
- *results for adults (book for aphasia)
Treatment of reading comprehension
- First acquire a literacy history
- May start with survival reading skills (maps, signs, medicine labels, addresses)
- Treating mild to moderate reading impairments
- printed word drills–> orally sound out words/non words, discriminate similar words, supply missing letters
- printed sentence drills–> patient must interpret sentences with syntactically difficult (passive voice) sentences, move to paragraphs, ect.