exam 2 Flashcards

1
Q

underlying hypothetical characteristics or processes that are hypothesized to exist but cannot directly be observed (example - intelligence)

A

conceptual variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

defining a variable in terms of procedures used to measure/or manipulate it

A

operational definition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

degree to which items on a measure appear to be reasonable (subjective)

A

face validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

degree to which the items on a measure adequately represent the entire range or set of items that could have been appropriately included; (subjective)

A

content validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

refers to the consistency of measurement

A

reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

increased by including similar items on a measure, by testing a diverse sample of individuals, and by using uniform testing procedures

A

reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

refers to the truthfulness of a measure: Does it measure what it intends to measure?

A

validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

represents the extent to which a measure assesses the theoretical construct it is designed to assess

A

construct validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

determined by assessing convergent validity and discriminant validity

A

construct validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

yields consistent or similar results each time it is administered

A

reliable self-report measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

a large group of participants take the test twice and their scores on the tests should be similar

A

test-retest reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

looks at how well a self-report measure aligns with a behavioral outcome (ability of a measure to predict an outcome)

A

criterion validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

when one measure recorded at one time predicts a criterion that occurs in the future

A

predictive validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

look at someone’s current behavior and compare it simultaneously to a self-report measure/assessment

A

concurrent validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

scores on a measure should correlate highly with scores on other measures of the same construct

A

convergent validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

scores on a measure should not correlate too strongly with scores on measures of other or unrelated constructs

A

discriminant validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

percentage of times two observers agree, over and beyond the degree of agreement that would be expected to occur by chance; it used with categorical data where you have mutually exclusive categories (nominal data)

A

Kappa

18
Q

number of times agree / number of opportunities to agree X 100

A

interrater reliability

19
Q

analyze with Spearman rank order correlation

A

ordinal data

20
Q

Pearson product correlation

A

interval/ratio scale data

21
Q

research methods that do not involve the manipulation of any variable by the researcher

A

descriptive methods

22
Q

determination of the relation between 2 variables

A

correlational study

23
Q

a study in which the variables to be studied are selected after they have occurred

A

ex post facto study

24
Q

seeks to determine the percentage of the population that has a certain characteristic, holds a particular opinion, or engages in a particular behavior

A

descriptive survey

25
Q

seeks to determine the relevant variables and how they are related

A

analytic survey

26
Q

why are they considered non-experimental?

A

they are considered non-experimental because we can only speculate the causation of the experiments. We can not conclude cause and effect

27
Q

what are the characteristics of experimental research?

A

the experiment is in a controlled setting. The researcher manipulates the IV in response to the DV

28
Q

more holistic in approach and does not focus on one or few variables, occurs in natural setting, and has a detailed and descriptive narrative of phenomena

A

qualitative research

29
Q

sets out with behavior to be measured in some way, it starts with preconceived hypothesis based on a theory, and is in a lab or controlled setting

A

quantitative study

30
Q

seeking answers to research questions by observing behavior in the real world

A

naturalistic observation

31
Q

research in which the goal is to learn about a culture or some aspect of a culture from the perspective of the members of that culture

A

ethnographic inquiry

32
Q

research in which the participant becomes part of the group being studied

A

participant observation

33
Q

7 to 10 participants with shared experiences or similar characteristics who meet for 1 to 1 1/2 hours to discuss a topic of common interest

A

focus group

34
Q

researcher actively gathers and interprets stories that individuals in their target group use to describe their lives

A

narrative studies

35
Q

studies involving the intensive observations of a single participant over an extended period of time

A

case studies

36
Q

involves the examination and analysis of extant artifacts, such as text-based materials

A

artifact analysis

37
Q

the collection and analysis of info and data in order to reconstruct past events

A

historiographies

38
Q

study of the common symbols that give meaning to human interaction within a social group context

A

symbolic interaction

39
Q

a qualitative research approach that attempts to develop theories of understanding based on data from the real world

A

grounded theory

40
Q

why are ethics vital to science?

A

science and psychology have a responsibility, “do no harm”, science and psychology try to improve lives, protect human and animal rights, need to have trust, benefits MUST outweigh risks