Exam 2 Flashcards
the range of positions along an attitude continuum a person finds acceptable
latitude of acceptance
the range of positions alone an attitude continuum a person finds unacceptable
latitude of rejection
the range of positions along an attitude continuum a person finds neither acceptable nor unacceptable (indifferent)
latitude of noncommitment
a person perceives a message as being similar to his or her attitudinal anchor and possibly closer than it really is from an objective point of view
assimilation
when a person perceives a message as being in opposition to his or her views
contrasting
a person’s commitment to an issue and related to a person’s self-concept and self-esteem
ego-involvement
what goes along with the latitude of acceptance?
assimilation
what goes along with the latitude of rejection?
contrasting
the difference between the position being advocated by a message and the preferred position of the receiver
message discrepancy
as message discrepancy increases, attitude change ______________
increases
what three factors can influence the relationship between discrepancy and attitude change?
1) ego-involvement
2) source credibility
3) language intensity
What is one significant strength of the social judgment theory?
provides an explanation of how an attitudinal anchor can change over time (how and why messages can backfire and result in a boomerang effect)
what is another strength of the social judgment theory?
helps to understand how people process a message and why two people holding similar attitudes can respond to the same message in different ways
can happen during contrasting, when a person’s anchor is moved in the opposite direction of the proposed message
boomerang effect
What is a limitation of the social judgment theory?
not very useful for controlling persuasion
what is another limitation of the social judgment theory?
doesn’t provide a theoretical prediction for what happens when a message falls in the LNC
what are two more limitations of the social judgment theory?
ordered alternatives questionnaire and doesn’t address how a message should be constructed
the amount of dissonance experienced
magnitude of dissonance
the process a person engages in to reduce cognitive dissonance that involves one or more of the following: change the behavior, change the ratio, change the importance, denial, bolstering, transcendence, and differentiation
dissonance reduction
an aversive motivational state that people are motivated to eliminate
cognitive dissonance
what are the 4 stages of the decision-making context?
1) conflict
2) decision
3) cognitive dissonance
4) dissonance reduction
what are 2 criterion necessary for cognitive dissonance to occur?
1) freedom of choice
2) insufficient external justification
what should be kept in mind when constructing persuasive messages?
consistency
what is the main strength of the cognitive dissonance theory?
its ability to explain at a theoretical level
what is a limitation of the cognitive dissonance theory?
difficult to disprove
what is another limitation of the cognitive dissonance theory?
not useful for creating messages intended to form new beliefs or attitudes
when an individual has this, they have control over their behavior
volitional control
the social pressure a person feels from important others to perform or not perform a behavior
subjective norm