Exam 2 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

rationality and natural law: universal truths

A

universal truths exist independently of our own subjective thoughts and experiences. we know these things for certain j by thinking abt them. (ex: tree falls in forest b/c laws of gravity. we dont need to be there to know it fell)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

well known examples of universal laws of human nature

A

Hobbes- human nature to seek peace thru war
Hobbes/Rousseau- the social contract
lock/jefferson- humans have natural right to life, liberty, property, equality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is more superior..natural laws or human made laws

A

natural laws are superior to human made laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

kant on rationality/natural law

A

a priori truth exists but we can never know them directly b/c its limited by subjectivities of our mind. moral truths about right and wrong exist but we cant know them directly. we can never know if natural laws really exist but we must take faith that they do.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

distinguishing normal from pathological: a preliminary method

A

if a phenomena exists in every single case then it is normal. (everyone does things wrong sometimes so deviance is normal and socially healthy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

give example of statistical deviance

A

if a person never does anything wrong/deviant then that is not normal and something is wrong with them since everyone sometimes does things wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

normality determined by effect on organism

A

determines normal from pathological by asking how it effects society and if society functions well with it or if it throws societal systems out of balance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

generals about distinguishing normal from pathological

A

ideological method has solution saying sole means to judge phenomena is to relate them to overriding thing. since deviance is relative what works for one society might not work for another. something can be termed pathological only in relation to a given species.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

why is crime normal?

A

b/c it exists in every society. crime must be in a society to be healthy. its human nature to deviate and inevitable that deviations will be labeled criminal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

why is crime useful?

A

b/c you need freedom for society to evolve/change. to have the idealist you need the criminal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what does deviance/crime have to do with social solidarity?

A

it reinforces it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

definitions of good and evil?

A

these definitions are linked to social life. as society changes, so do definitions of good and evil.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how are witch hunts/moral panics an application of durkheim?

A

b/c deviance holds society together. when people break the law they give others the opportunity to define community boundaries. implies outcasts serve purpose to society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Erikson: holy experiment

A

how/why does a community decide which behavior merits attention? why do some things get labeled deviant but not others? to answer this use definitions of deviance used by sociological group of study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

functionalism

A

communities encourage and discourage deviance at same time. deviance includes rites of transition into permanent deviant identities. creates population on the fringes of society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is eriksons general hypothesis

A

when community boundaries shift, deviant behavior shifts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what is a crime wave

A

increased publicity of a particular brand of deviant behavior. may/may not correspond to increase in deviant behavior. not always new behavior, can be emerging need to clarify pre-existing boundary lines

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what are the three crime waves

A

antinomian controversy of 1636, quaker persecutions of late 1650’s, witchcraft hysteria of 1692

19
Q

antinomian controversy of 1636

A

people did not like the new settlers coming to the colony. the colony was setting up a new govt which was gov by church, clergy decided if ppl were pious enough to vote. Anne hutchinson passed judgement on men and churches control. she was charged with treason for her opinions along with her friends

20
Q

quaker persecutions of late 1650s

A

support in England for there great experiment died and they felt lost since no one was looking to them as model for ideal society. then the Quakers showed up, the invasion was about resisting change into new brand of puritanism. 2 women showed up and were arrested the second they stepped on shore. belongings burned.

21
Q

what was result of quaker invasion?

A

they called them an army but they really slowly trickled yet, Quakerism banned (which is basically just being British). there were lots of executions. anti-loitering law called vagabond act passed

22
Q

in 1660 what did charles 11 do when quakers complained to him

A

he issued an order of religious freedom in colonies, they can no longer limit vote based on church membership.

23
Q

witchcraft hysteria of 1692

A

colony had lost favor with king, original settlers on brink of collapse. dissention among original settlers grew. girls in colony start acting strange and they accused people of being witches based on what the girls said with no real evidence

24
Q

why did the girls say people were witches

A

they liked the power and accused politically/economically powerful people

25
Q

why did witchcraft hysteria stop?

A

they executes so many people and then started to question the proof they accepted. started doing trial by ordeal (the prayer one), testimony of neighbors, confessions, physical marks, spectral evidence

26
Q

becker: moral entrepeneurs

A

someone who takes initiative to create new deviant rules.

27
Q

rule creator

A

Professionals who make a living off of creating morality legislation

28
Q

rule enforcer

A

not concerned with content of rules, rather carrying out his job

29
Q

crusading reformer

A

see their mission as a holy one. they’re not j interested in making their own moral laws, but also that new rules will be good for everyone so there is no possible unforeseen consequences. driven by morals and must rely on advice of experts

30
Q

what counts as real/reality

A

reality is contingent on context. it is phenomena we recognize as having a being independent of our own volition

31
Q

basic premise of reality

A

not priori given. it is contextual and what counts as knowledge is relative. sociologists can study process by which reality is taken for granted. people take reality for granted unless something makes them question it

32
Q

theory regarding social reality

A

social reality constructed in interaction, often in a dialectical fashion, using subjective meanings, and thru internalization processes operating via an imagines social structure and imagined other

33
Q

social interaction in everyday life

A

reality is shared and experienced thru face to face interaction. we experience it as ordered with a structure that exists.

34
Q

how is chaos turned into order

A

experiences are chaotic. chaos turned into order by selective attention. this is ignoring/highlighting and re-imagining experience. it is human nature to make stuff up and call it real

35
Q

berger/luckmann: legitimation

A

the shared reality we all inhabit is socially constructed yet we see it as legitimate. legitimation involves explaining (cognitive validity) and justifying (normative dignity)

36
Q

conceptual machineries: therapy and nihilation

A

therapy- ensures deviants stay within institutionalized definition of reality
nihiliation- which attacks speaker, making them seem crazy and that their point of view is wrong. denies an outsiders reality bringing them in line with dominant symbolic universe

37
Q

4 levels of legitimation

A

affirmations- existence is self evident. existence forgotten if no word for it
sayings- pragmatic saying. “the early bird gets the worm”
theories- coherent, institutionalized body of knowledge like the science of economics
symbolic universe- all official and unofficial realities. needs to be actively maintained against threats from outside

38
Q

what are conceptual machineries

A

forms of legitimation that are products of social activity.

39
Q

in the division of labor how does durkeheim measure social solidarity

A

by using law as an indicator because he thought it represented the most important aspect of social solodarity

40
Q

In the division of labor how does Durkheim measure social solidarity

A

Using law as an indicator because he couldn’t measure social solidarity directly so he chose to measure collective consciousness

41
Q

What does Durkheim think about science

A

Science can instruct us about ultimate values. Ethical rules discovered via rational thot experiments could be verified thru empirical observation

42
Q

What reason did reinarman give for sociological interest in drug scares

A

They are a recurring cultural and political phenomena

43
Q

Anti-opium legislation. Which group?

A

Chinese