Exam 2 Flashcards

1
Q

OPPS

A

Outpatient Prospective Payment System

Implemented Aug. 1, 2000 to replace fee-for service Medicare reimbursement with a fixed, prospectively determined payment system for products and services provided by outpatient treatment facilities

Due to escalating outpatient healthcare costs, Congress asked via Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) legislation of 1986 & 1990 for the secretary of the HHS to develop a proposal for an outpatient PPS system

The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 provided for implementation of a PPS for most hospitals outpatient services effective 1/1/99
Implementation was delayed until 8/1/2000 due to Y2K system concerns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

APC

A

Ambulatory Payment Classification

Developed by CMS for hospital outpatient (facility) reimbursement
Pays for:
◦Designated outpatient services
◦Certain Medicare Part B services furnished to hospital inpatients who do not have Part A coverage◦Partial hospitalization services
◦714 APCs for CY 2018

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Hospital Exceptions

A

•Hospitals that only provide Part B services to inpatients
•Critical Access Hospitals
•Indian Health Service and Tribal Hospitals
•Hospitals in
◦American Samoa, Guam, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Virgin Islands and Maryland hospitals paid under waiver provisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

APC Group Example

A

APCs classify procedures/services similar clinically& in resource costs and assigns them to

APC groups for payment:
◦Example APC group 0170 Dialysis contains:◦G0257 Unscheduled or emergency dialysis in a hospital◦90935 Hemodialysis, one eval
◦Both of these codes pay the same!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Two time rule

A

Items and services within an APC can not be grouped together if the highest cost item is more than two times greater than the lowest cost item within the same group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How to Calculate an APC Payment?

A

Conversion Factor x APC Relative weight

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

High Cost Outlier Payment

A

Outlier payments
◦threshold hit when service exceeds 1.75 X APC pmt amount—(if cost is at least 1.75 more than APC amt) and exceeds the APC payment rate by $2,900 facility will be paid 50% of excess

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Affordable Care Act

A

Preventative Services (effective 2011)
◦Patient costs sharing requirement (deductible and co-insurance) are waived for mostpreventative services
◦There is a US Preventative Service Task Force that prepares a list of those services considered preventative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

APCs are based on HCPCS codes

A

Each HCPCS code has a payment status indicator (SI) attached
The payment SI determines if and how the service is paid (examples):
◦C-Inpt procedure—not paid under OPPS
◦S-Significant procedure not discounted when multiple
◦T- Significant procedure discounted when multiple
Multiple APCs can be paid in one visit
Some services are still paid under a fee schedule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Key Features of APC System

A

Packaging services-services integral to the delivery of a service and contribute to the cost of the service.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Composite APCs

A

•In CY 2008, CMS developed composite APCs to provide a single payment for services that are generally performed together in a single encounter. There were no new composite APCs created for CY 2018.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Coding Systems for OPPS

A
  • Opportunities for upcoding are minimal
  • APC groups based on HCPCS codes
  • Level I-CPT
  • Level II-National codes
  • Medicare mandates use of Level II, other payers may require Level I
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Information Systems

A
Encoder
◦CPT/HCPCS code selection
◦Modifier assignments
◦CCI edits
APC grouper
◦Status indicator
◦APC designations
◦Weights
◦APC payment (incl. packaging & discounting)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

OCE & NCCI are what?

What is the goal?

A

The OCE and NCCI are two editing systems used to process claims using CPT and HCPCS Level II codes and modifiers
Goal: to identify coding patterns resulting in overpayment to providers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

OCE

What are the 3 major functions?

A

Outpatient Code Editor
Developed in 1996
is a software package supplied by CMS. This version of the OCE processes claims consisting of multiple days of service.
The OCE performs three major functions:
Edit the data to identify errors and return a series of edit flags.
Assign an Ambulatory Payment Classification (APC) number for each service covered under OPPS, and return information to be used as input to a PRICER program.
Assign an Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC) payment group for services on claims from certain Non-OPPS hospitals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

NCCI means?
When was it added? and added to who?
What is the goal?

A

National corrective coding initiative
Added to the OCE in 2000
NCCI edits are used by those who process physician payments under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule
edits are developed based on coding conventions defined in the AMA’s CPT book, current standards of medical and surgical coding practice, input from specialty societies, and based on analysis of current coding practice.
NCCI does not review across service dates!
NCCI goal is to promote national correct coding and to control improper coding that could lead to inappropriate payments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

NCCI Prohibits unbundling of outpatient procedures via three types of edits:

A

Comprehensive/Component edits aka Column1/Column 2
Mutually Exclusive Edits aka Column1/Column2
Medically Unlikely Edits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Comprehensive/Component edits aka Column1/Column 2

A

Code pairs that should not be billed together because one service inherently includes another
Codes are broken into two procedure tables. In each table there are two columns of codes that represent services that should not be coded together.
If an encounter has codes from both columns, this creates an edit pair. If both codes from the edit pair are billed for the same beneficiary, same date of service, by the same performing provider, the Column 1 is eligible for payment and the Column 2 code is subject to denial as the service is considered integral.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Mutually exclusive edits

A

Code pairs that clinically are unlikely to be performed on the same patient on the same day
Codes are broken into two procedure tables. In each table there are two columns of codes that represent services that should not be coded together based on anatomic, temporal, or gender considerations
If an encounter has codes from both columns, this creates an edit pair. If both codes from the edit pair are billed for the same beneficiary, same date of service, by the same performing provider, the Column 1 is eligible for payment and the Column 2 code is subject to denial as the service is considered integral.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Medical unlikely Edits

A

MUE are a different type of NCCI edit that began in 1/2007
Does not look at code combinations and bundling
Instead focuses on how many units are billed for a single CPT code
MUE are line item edits rather than claim level edits
If units of service exceed that allowed by the MUE, the entire line is denied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Edits on website

A

All edits are updated quarterly and changes are communicated through Program Memorandum Transmittals.

22
Q

Modifiers

A

Modifiers are used to clarify coding, and provide additional information
Modifiers are important in the OCE and NCCI edits as they may serve to bypass the edits, but only if they are appropriate to use
A modifier should not be appended to a HCPCS/CPT code solely to bypass NCCI edits

23
Q

Modifiers That May bypass edits

A
Anatomic modifiers
-E1-E4, FA, F1-F9, TA, T1-T9, LT, RT, LC, LD, RC
Global surgery modifiers
-25, 58, 78, 79
Other modifiers
-22, 27, 59 (new rules, see PPT), 91
24
Q

Modifier 59

A

Modifier 59 is an important NCCI associated modifier
Modifier 59 should be used when it is appropriate to bypass a bundling edit
Example
-A patient presents with two lesions, one on the arm and another on the face. The physician excises the lesion on the arm and takes a biopsy of the lesion of the face. Both services are coded.

25
Q

Edit examples

A
Invalid diagnosis code
 Diagnosis and age conflict
 Diagnosis and sex conflict 
Medicare secondary payer alert 
External codes (diagnosis) can not be used as principal diagnosis
26
Q

Edits & guidelines

A

There are a both overlap and a few difference between the professional fee and facility edits and guidelines
Bypass modifiers may differ
Coding pairs may differ

27
Q

Cpt Assistant

who publishes it and what does it contain

A

AMA publishes CPT Assistant which contains Coding Guidelines
CMS does not review or approve the information in this publication
In developing edits, CMS occasionally disagrees with advice found in CPT Assistant (typically about bundling advice)

28
Q

POA reporting required by the State of Illinois effective when?

A

10/1/2007

29
Q

POA Reporting

what year with what act?

A

2005 Deficit Reduction Act demands accountability from providers for complications that occur AFTER a patient is admitted to the hospital
Key will be ability to separate the pre-existing conditions a patient has upon arrival from conditions acquired during the hospital stay
 Tracking this information over time will allow the hospital’s performance to be assessed

30
Q

State POA Guidelines

States and Years

A

Some states had already implemented POA reporting
◦New York (1994)
◦California (1996)
◦Maryland, Massachusetts & Wisconsin (1/07)
Some states plan to make this data public!
Complicating matters is that federal and state requirements may vary

31
Q

Federal POA Guidelines-years

A

10/1/2007 federal guidelines required all general acute care inpatient hospitals reimbursed under the IPPS to include the POA indicator for eachdiagnosis on all Medicare claims
1/1/2008 Claims that did not have a POA indicator will receive a remark code on the claim, yet processing will continue
After 4/1/2008 claims that did not have a POA indicator were returned to hospitals

32
Q

What is a POA Indicator?

A

A flag that identifies a diagnosis as present at the time of inpatient admission
It can include conditions:
◦Known at admission
◦Present on admission, but not diagnosed until later
POA Reporting Guidelines are included as part of the ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting-See Appendix I
◦“Present at the time the order for inpatient admission occurs”

33
Q

What is the point of a POA Indicator?

A

To determine when a given condition occurred or developed
Why…..
◦Steps within a “pay for performance” system

34
Q

Reporting Standards

A

Wording of the Deficit Reduction act does not require POA on principal dx
ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines and UB-04 Data Specifications Manual do require it!
◦On principal, secondary and external cause codes
Guidelines also provide direction on how to assign a POA indicator when it is not known if dx was present on admission; clinically undetermined; and when dx code is exempt from POA reporting

35
Q

Who will perform POA requirement?

A

Coders
◦Increased the amount of physician queries for awhile
◦Not required to report on a condition that would not otherwise be coded
The UB-04 paper & electronic form are able to accept POA indicator reporting

36
Q

POA Research

A

In 2012, CMS issued a research report that found no widespread patterns of underreporting of POA status (3% underreporting)
“HAC reporting is becoming more reliable” according to the study

37
Q

THE INPATIENT PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM

A
  • def-method of payment undertaken by CMS to control the cost of inpatient hospital services to Medicare patients
  • 1983 SS Amendment Title VI
38
Q

DIAGNOSIS RELATED GROUPS (CMS-DRGS)

A
  • Developed in the 1960s at Yale
  • Initially used in New Jersey in the late 1970s
  • Patient classification scheme
  • Categorizes medically related inpatients with respect to diagnoses & treatment & similar LOS
39
Q

MAJOR DIAGNOSTIC CATEGORIES (MDCS)

A
  • All possible principal diagnoses were divided into mutually exclusive areas called MDCs
  • Currently there are
  • 25 MDCs
  • 17 pre-MDC (MDC 0) designations (organ transplants & tracheostomy)
  • Most MDCs correspond to a major organ system, others are known as residual
40
Q

MEDICAL MDC

A

Defined based on the precise principal diagnosis
i.e. reason for admission
Specific classes of principal diagnosis

41
Q

SURGICAL MDC

A
  • Operating Room Procedures
  • Use of the OR has significant effect on the type of resources used
  • Surgical partitioning if procedure would likely be performed in the OR
42
Q

STRUCTURE OF MS-DRGS

A
  • Classifies patients who:
  • are clinically similar
  • who use hospital resources in a similar fashion
  • use of common organ system or etiology
43
Q

MS-DRGS

A
  • Today there are over 740 MS-DRGs
  • MS-DRGs are used for:
  • Reimbursement by other insurers
  • Data analysis in negotiating managed care contracts
  • Utilization or Care management
44
Q

MS-DRG PAYMENT RATES

A
  • Based on two factors:•Relative weighting factor•Individual hospital rate
  • Relative weights-number assigned to each MS-DRG used as a multiplier to determine reimbursement.

Individual hospital rate x Relative weight of the MS-DRG=Reimbursement for Medicare inpatient

MS-DRGs are not assigned manually, they are assigned by software known as a GROUPER

45
Q

COMPLICATIONS AND COMORBIDITIES

A
  • Complication-an additional diagnosis that arises during the hospitalization and extends the LOS in most cases
  • Comorbidity-an additional diagnosis that exists at the time of the admission and extends the LOS in most cases
  • CC=complication or comorbid condition
  • MCC=major complication or comorbid condition
46
Q

MEDICAL SEVERITY DRGS(MS-DRGS) 2008

A
  • Adopted by Medicare in 2008 to improve recognition of severity of illness and resource consumption-745 MS-DRGs for that FY
  • Based MS-DRG relative weights on hospital costs (instead of hospital charges that are associated with CMS-DRGs)
  • Recognized 335 “base” DRGs which are further refined or stratified by complications or comorbidities (CC)
47
Q

Updates

A
•Biannual code changes (April & Oct)
-ICD-10-CM/PCS codes
•Annual changes (Oct)
-MS-DRGs
-List of CCs/MCCs
  • In addition
  • Federal law requires CMS to adjust MS-DRG weights annually to reflect changes in treatment patterns, technology, etc.
  • GROUPER is thus updated annually (Oct)
48
Q

CASE MIX INDEX

A

MS-DRG basic unit of payment for Medicare inpatients

Case mix index-(CMI)-the average of the relative weights of all cases treated at a given hospital. Case mix index is then used to make comparisons at a facility over time or between hospitals.

49
Q

DETERMINING CASE MIX INDEX

A
  • Can be determined for all patients or only Medicare
  • Add all relative weights and divide by the number of patients in the population
  • Case Mix is determined by:
  • Sum of all relative weights of MS-DRGs/Total number of discharges for a period
50
Q

Payment of claims

A
  • Medicare claims are paid to providers through contractual arrangement with a Third Party Organization (TPO/TPP)
  • Those that process and pay Medicare Part A (Hospital inpatient & outpatient services) & Medicare Part B (Physician claims & suppliers services) are called a Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC)
51
Q

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ORGANIZATION

A
  • The initial Peer Review Organization (PRO) program began under the Peer Improvement Act of 1982.
  • Under the Act, CMS contracts with QIOs to assure medically necessary, appropriate and quality healthcare service by region. (Telligen-IL)
  • Contracts are five years in length and each contract period is known as a Statement of Work
  • QIOs may change MS-DRG assignment
  • Hospital is then notified and may request a single re-review