exam 2 Flashcards
what are the two possibilities of what is stored in learning
1) stimulus -> response association (habit)
2) stimulus -> stimulus association (expectation of the future)
what are the two possibilities of what is stored in learning in an example in terms of 1) T-> food and 2) stop sign -> brake
T -> food
1) S-R possibility: T -> salivation
2) S-S possibility: T -> food
stop sign -> brake
1) S-R: stop sign -> “hit brake”
2) S-S: stop sign -> cars coming, could hurt people, etc
why can dogs learn the L-T association (evidence for S-S learning)
sensory preconditioning: learning the relationship between two sensory things before ever presenting a US
dogs are not blind reflex beasts they can look forward to future events and learn L-T
why can pigeons learn the different color light associations (evidence for S-S learning)
US devaluation study: taking away the value of something to reveal the understanding of two sensory stimuli associations
what is natural to think happens during extinction in terms of T-food
1) T -> food
2) T -> nothing
so people think that T does not = food (loss of association/connection)
THIS IS WRONG
what are the examples of evidence that show associations survive extinction
1) spontaneous recovery: response comes back after time apart
2) reinstatement: adding the US back in after some time
3) disinhibition: changing the setting
4) renewal: changing the context
what are the two theories that answer the question: if extinction doesn’t erase CS-US association what does it do?
1) loss of attention to the CS, in other words habituation, there is recovery of attention when aroused (association is never broken)
T-food | T-nothing | food | T?
reminds you of last time you got food or arouses you
2) competing memory theory (two memories stored at once)
T-food & T-nothing
what are some psychopathies attributed to classical conditioning
1) specific phobias: something happens to you and you’re always afraid of that thing
2) relapse after drug use: you previously associated certain CS with drugs, then you go through recovery, after seeing CS you relapse
3) child sexual abuse: most predators suffered abuse too
4) PTSD: certain CS remind you of US
5) mood disorders
what are the conditioned based treatments for drug relapse
1) lab extinction
2) give med that blocks drug addiction
3) aversion therapy
4) substitution therapies
5) teach new competing CRs
what are the problems with lab extinction
responses could recover, real world is not context of extinction
what are the problems with giving a med that blocks drug addiction
when people got an implantable naltrexone pellet they try to take it out themselves
what is aversion therapy
instead of drug cues -> nothing, drug cues -> bad things
what are some examples of aversion therapy and some problems
1) cigarette cessation: sit in room filled with cigarette stuff and smoke until sick
Problems: people have to volunteer for this, real world is also not context of extinction
2) alcohol abuse: antabuse, a chemical that reacts with alcohol to make you nauseous
problems: you have to voluntarily take the tablet
what is the substitution theory
CS-> crave, so take a different US
what are some examples and problems with substitution theory
1) heroin: methadone is an opiot like heroin but less powerful
2) nicotine: chantix, some action on receptor site as nicotine but is less powerful
problems: don’t really get rid of addiction
what are the three ways to teach new competing CR’s
1) behavior alternative: teach things to do in response to craving a drug (crave and run)
2) imagery: teach that every time you think of a cigarette you think of diseased lungs and people
3) waiting: want cigarette, but wait 5 minutes, then wait 5 more to eventually thin out use
what are the two theories that can explain the translation of knowledge into behavior
1) stimulus substitution
2) CS allows you to adapt or prepare for the US
what is stimulus substitution
CS just “stands in” for US, causes same response
ex. T-> food -> salivate
T-> (T) -> salivate (tone takes place of food)
what are the examples of CS allowing you to adapt or prepare for the US (CR’s help you prepare)
1) fighting fish (show on paper)
2) conditioned mating (show on paper)
3) conditioned snuggling (show on paper)
what is compensatory conditioning
form of the conditioned response, the CR is adaptive
shows association is made (drug opposite response)
homeostasis: maintaining constant internal conditions
what is an example of conditioned opposite response in Pavlov with dogs and with drinking in the real world
show on paper
what are CRs technically
the “withdraw symptoms”
ex. a hangover is a mini withdraw from alcohol and that is why drinking the next morning makes you feel better
withdrawal systems are the exact opposite of the drug symptoms
what is tolerance
tolerance = UR + CR
what is operant conditioning and how is it different than classical conditioning
classical: stimulus -> stimulus association
operant: réponse -> stimulus association, your response or behavior is the cause of a stimulus coming (your behavior controls the outcome)
define positive, negative, reinforcement, punishment
(will be on test!!!!)
positive: behavior making something more likely to happen
negative: behavior makes something less likely to happen
reinforcement: anything you do to make response go up
punishment: anything you do to make response go down
what are examples of all of the types of reinforcements and punishments in terms of rats BP for food
1) positive reinforcement: BP -> food
2) positive punishment: BP -> shock
3) negative punishment: free food, BP -> no food
4) negative reinforcement: free shock, BP -> turns shock off
what are real life examples of all the types of reinforcements and punishments
1) positive reinforcement: good behavior -> cookie
2) positive punishment: misbehave -> yell
3) negative punishment: bad behavior -> take phone away
4) negative reinforcement:
escape: bad date, safety call -> leave, so you set up safety call next time
avoidance: ask friends about boy, they say no -> avoid bad date
what are the techniques for studying instrumental conditioning
1) discrete trial: counting trial 1, trial 2…
2) free operant techniques: rat BP, pigeon pecking at light
what are some examples of discrete trials
1) straight runway: rat is in a straight runway with hidden food at the other side, collecting your data by measuring speed or time to get to end
2) T-maze: rat is in a T shaped maze with food in one of the corners, collecting your data by looking at where the rat turns, % of correct turns
what are the pros of using free operant techniques (Skinner)
1) more applicable to scenarios in real life, the species can make choice freely
2) define behavior base don how it operates in the environment, behavior is defined by the effect it has on the world (outcome)
how do you get the rat to press the first time?
reward the rat when he does behaviors close to the desired behavior (shaping by successive approximations)
ex. facing food (reward), walking towards food (reward), sniffing level (reward) etc.
what is a real life example of operant responses
the tenure system
when you’re done grad school you need publications on your resume so you do small, safe studies not big risky ones
this is an operant contingency
what are the two developed theories to explain reinforcements (neither of these are right)
drive reduction theory: reinforcers are events that satisfy biological needs/drives (hunger, thirst, sexual arousal, pain avoidance)
or the “pleasure theory” that says reinforcements are stimuli; released dopamine in the “pleasure center”
what is the study that disproves the drive reduction theory
if reinforcers are events that satisfy needs, punishers are events that make needs worse
put male rat in straight line cage with receptive female rat on the other side, have the rat run across and start mating with the female but take him out in the middle of mating
drive reduction theory says that the rat will eventually stop running but he actually runs faster
sometimes increases in drive states are rewarding (drive reduction is not right)
what are some examples of studies that disprove the “pleasure theory”
problem with “pleasure theory” is sensory reinforcement
1) monkeys press button to open a shade and look at lab even though its not pleasurable
2) rats will press a bar to run through an empty maze, no biological pleasure
3) infants will suck a pacifier harder to view vacation slides which are pleasurable
4) humans will spend money to solve crosswords or go to horror films, none of these are pleasurable
what does the relative reinforcer theory (Premack Principle) consider compared to the dual process and pleasure theory
considers preferences between events
BP -> food
-given choice between bar pressing and eating, rats would pick eating
-bar pressing is less probable behavior and eating food is more probable behavior
-so reinforcement is when something you’re less likely to do leads to something you’re more likely to do
-punishments are when something you’re more likely to do leads to sometimes you’re less likely to do (BP -> shock)
what is an example of the relative reinforcer theory in rats choosing eating > running > grooming
1) teach rat grooming (less) -> running (more), this is reinforcement so grooming will go up
2) teach rat eating (more) -> running (less), this is punishment so eating will go down