exam 2 Flashcards
—– —— is indicated to control the progress of perio destruction and attachment loss when more conservative non surgical treatment is insufficent
periodontal surgery
True or false
almost all dental procedures would be considered surgery
true
the major benefit and indication for perio surgery as an adjunct to non sugerical perio treatment is to gain access…
to the root surface for scaling and root planing. It also improves access for plaque biofilm control.
perio surgery results in better access to
furcations, complex root surfaces, and infrabony pockets
Improving access for plaque biofilm control by the patient may require removing tissues or bony forms that block the patient from adeqautely removing as much biofilm as necassary to control the disease
true
disadvantages of perio surgery include
health status
age of the patient
and the specific limitatons of each procedure
the patients opinion of the negatives of perio surgery are
time
cost
aesthetics
disomfort
the healing after non surgerical therapies is atleast
4 weeks
the amount of pocket reduction observed after these procedures inficates the extent of surgical procedures s
that are still required
in prescribing perio surgery the periodontist carefully considers
probing pocket depth
amount of bone loss
importantce of the tooth to function and aesthetics
patients level of plaque biofilm control
patients general health
is a deepended gingival sulcus with an infected root surface covered by an ulcerated epithelial surface with underlying inflamed connective tissue
periodontal pocket
the periodontal pocket is bound ——– by the gingival margin on one side by the root surfae on the other sie by the epithelial surface and at the base by the junctional epithelium
coronally
scaling and root planing is effective in controlling perio disease to probing depths of about 1
4 mm
pockets deeper than 5 mm are
difficult to intstrument and therefore often remain infected even after the best care
pockets greater than — -mm suggest extreme loss of attachment which makes the long term prognosis for retaing the affected teeth poor
9mm
perio surgery is most succesful when treating perio pockets with probing depths of
5-9 mm
probing depths is not always equal to
clinical attachment loss
measurement from the crest of the gingival margin to the base of the pocket
probing pocket depth
measured from the cemento enamel junction to the base of the pocket
attachment loss
if the gingival margin is on the root surface as when there has been recession the attachment loss is greater
than the probing depth
if the gingival margin is on the enamel surface of the crown as in the gingival hypertrophy than the attachment loss is less than the
probing depth
attachment loss represents
bone destruction
not all probing depths greater than five need surgery
true
the 5mm guideline is only the
first step in identifying if patients need perio surgery
patients with 5-6 mm may be monitored with a — and —- approach to determine whether non surgical perio therapy and careful maintence are adequate
wait and see
to know that a disease is definitely progressing a — mmm increase in probing depth must be observed over time. if surgery is postponed the dentist must be willing to risk this — mm loss
2
the base of the perio pocket is not at the
level of the crest of the alveolar bone
there is usually — to — mm of connective tissue attachment covered by the epithilium between the probing depth and the alveolar bone
1-2 mm
BIOLOGIC WIDTH
bone loss caused by perio disease results in
osseous defects
osseous defects may occur
in a horizontal dimension where the bone resorbs equally on the mesial and distal surfaces or a vertical dimension where the resorption is unequal around the teeth
pockets that are coronal to horizontal bone loss are often called
suprabony pockets
pockets that extend apicaly beyond the crest of the bone are called
infrabony pockets
– may also occur in a variety of configurations that are usually described by the number of bony walls remaining
vertical bone loss
when all the walls of the osseous defects are within the bone housing they may be termed
infrabony pockets
perio surgery that includes modification of the bone level or shape is called
osseous surgery
grafting or regenerations techniques may be required
if perio surgery isnt needed
generally osseous surgery performed to correct
irregulary shaped defects of the bony support around the tooth is indicated when at least half of the bone support remains.
an abutement tooth for a functioning fixed bridge can be importnat to the patient and often every attempt
to salvage a particular tooth through perio surgery is strongly indicated.
patients with pocking depths exceeding 5 mm and half there supporting bone lost who are relatively young (younger than —) have an aggressive form of perio disease
30
patients oolder than — years with the same clinical condition usually have a more slowly progressing form of the disease
60
the goal of — — — is to reduce perio pocket depth by removing soft tissues to a level at which plaque biolfium control and maintence procedures are effective usually not exceeding 3 to 4 mm in depth
pocket reduction surgery
methods for pocket reduction include
excisoional perio surgery (gingevectomy) and incisional perio surgery (flap)
excisional perio surgery remove the excess tissue from
the wall of the perio pocket
used for rapid reduction of the gingival pockets
the most basic excisional surgical procedures are termed
gingivectomy or gingivoplasty
first consideriation for pocket reduction is usually
gingvectomy
you can do that and gingivoplasty together
the presence of deep perio pockets with thick fibrous tissue is the major indication for
gingivectomy
drug induced gingival hyperplasia is treated with
gingivectomy
caused by antiseizure meds phenytoin ccb to control blood pressure or immunosupressive drugs
perio scaling and root planing should be completed (– to – weeks) before surgery allows tissues to heal
4 to 6
often, the need for gingivectomy cannot be determined until tissue shrinkage ater scaling and root plaing has occured
true
edematous friable and hemorrahagic tissues are not easily incised and therefore require adequate healing time ater scaling and root planing and before surgery
true
gingevectomy the gingiva is excised with knifes at
45 degree angle to the gingival surfacekeeping the incsion with the keritinized gingiva
healing is usually uneventful and the gingial epithelium is reestablished — weeks after surgery
2
gingivectomy is rarely used for pocket reduction
due to the many contraindictions
the primary contraindiction to gingivectomy is
the procedure does not permit access to infrabony pockets, those below the crest of the alveolar bone, a highly common occurance in periodontisits
other negatives of gingivectomy is
wide wound is created, which makes healing slow discomfort.
the anatomy of the surrounding area may prevent incising the tissues at the proper angel or minimal width of attached gingiva may prevent keeping the incision with the keratinized tissue
unacceptable aesthetics sens. tp heat and cold and caries
incisional surgery
perio flap surgery or simple flap
incisional surgery
is the procedure of choice when excisional perio surgery cannot be performed for pocket reduction.
incisional surgery is called flap surgery because the
tissues are pushed away from the underlying tooth roots and alveolar bone much like a flap or envelope.
the usual incisional technique for pocket reduction with a flap surgery is called teh
apically positioned flap because the flap is sutured at a more apical location on the tooth roots to reduce pocket depths.
flap surgery has fewer contraindictions than
gingivectomy
the majority of implants used in dentristy are the root form type
endosseous implants which are based on the principles of osseointegreation
today in excess of 50 implant systems are avaiable with innovations being proposed and instituted by dinfferent manufactures through intense competition
true
ideally longitudinal trials of – years or longer are required to forecast the validity of emerging treatment concepts
5
subperiosteal and transosteal
still seen but less often
custom made cast framework that is placed beneath he periosteum over the alveolar bone
subperiosteal implant can be used on top or bottom
in subperiosteal the frame rests
on the jawbone with no evidence of direct union with the bone in most cases
transosteal implants
traverse the mandible in a apicocoronal direction. they protrude through the gingival tissues into the mouth for prosthesis anchorage
a stabilization plate is placed along the inferior border of the mandible
with transosteal implants
tranosteal implants are often called
staple implants
the interfacial adaption between the subperiosteal and transosteal implants and bone resmembles that of a scar tissue with no direct bone anchorage
creates a compromised arrangement under occlusal loads
endossesous two types
blade and root
root form
screw or cylindicral shaped with different lengths diameters and specific design character.
the blade implant
no longer used because it has a high incidence of complications and failures
—- — — — provide direct osseous anchorage through formation of an intimate lattice between the implant surface and bone
root form endossesous implant
most predictable and accepeted
scanning electron microscopy of the interface reveals a narrow nonminerilized zone approx — to — between the bone and the implant containing chondrotin sulfate glycosaminoglycans
20 to 40
the def of osseointegration as propsed by brainemark is
direct structural and functional connection between ordered living bone an the surgace of a load bearing implant
because implant integration involves soft and hard tissues the term — —- implant has been suggested to describe implant integration better
stably integrated
—– observation of the bone interace has also demonstrated that because of thedynamic nature of the bone 100 percent integration never develops and the bone to implant contact is both time dependant and influenced by implant surface characterisitcs
longitudinal.
the amount of bone to implant contact varies among different implant systems
30 to 70 the exact amount of bone to implant contact required for sucess has not been determined.
the bioloical process involved in attainment and maintents of implant integration depends on factors that include
biomaterials bicompatibilty implant design bone factors surgical and loading consideration
close contact of living cells at its surface which does not contain leachable that produce inflammation and which does not prevent growth and division of cells in culture
biocompatibility
molecules that seperate off the surface
leachables
gold, stainless steel, cobalt chromium alloys, bioactive glasses, niobium, hydroxyappetite, tricalcium, phosphate, polymers, zirconium, titatium
biomatierlas not all are compatible as an implant material.
any implanted material is consiered
a foreign body
metals in contact with tissue fluid are prone to
degration and dissoulotion by corrossion
exchange of protons with biological molecules leads to
antigen formation and cellular uptake
—– has become the standard in osseointegration
titanum
highly reative yet biocompatible metal
titanium
titanium rapidly forms a layer of surface oxides (— to —-) mm thick most notably of titanium oxide when exposed to air or fluid
.3-.5mm
the oxide layer prevents —– on the surface so that tissue integreation can occurs
erosion
advantages of titanium
light weight and can withstand occlusal forces
the length of implants are between — to — long
8 to 14
based on avaibable bone height and proximity to votal structures such as nerve trunks and blood vessels
implant diameters range from
3 to 6
the selection of diamter is based on
the width of the jaw ridge at the implant site
the jaw ridge is narrower in the —- so narrower implants are used there
lateral incisor
wider impants can be used in
molar region
the most common implant shape
cylindrical
implants exhibit
threaded surface design
there are — implants also avaiable with no threads
hollow
the initial stability of the implants is in part dependant on the
surface texture
many studies have shown that a higher bone to implant contact is attained around
rough surfaced implants
methods for producing roughened implant surfaces include
grit blasting acid etching plasma spraying and using additive surfaces such as hydroxyappating coating
the amount of bone to implant contact achieved at the time of the implant placement isrelated to the quantiy and quality of bone and determines
fixture stabilty
there is variability in the
amount of cortical and cancellous tissue with the arch and between the maxilla and mandible
the volum density or cortical bone is
three to four times that of cancellous bone
—— contribute less to implant stability at placement
cancellous
resorption of the alvelous is a natural sequeale to
tooth loss
the extent of the resorption process is dependent on
the history or trauma, length of time since loss occured, and loading removable prosthesis
quality of bone is also influenced by systemic condition such as
osteoporosis and social factors such as smoking
there are no fixed guideline for the length of healing time after surgery and before prosthetic loading of implants
true
brianne orginally advised — months for mandible and – months for maxilla
3
6
movement of the implant more than —- um during the healing phase may result in fibrous tissue encapsulation of the implant rather than osseointegration a result that does not provide long term functional occlusal load
100
——- is compatible with attaining osseointegration
immediate loading
treatment should be delayed in younger patients until growth is near completion because unlike the natural dentition
implant s remain stationary during dentoalveolar growth.
conditions that increase the patients susceptibilty to infection such as uncontrolled diabetes may result in
high incidence of peri implantitis and implant failure