Exam 2 Flashcards
Moderator
A variable that changes the relationship between two other variables
Ex: Exercise is a moderator for stress
Coping
The process of trying to manage demands that are appraised as taxing or exceeding one’s resources
Active and changing process, affected by personality
Negative affectivity
A personality variable marked by a pervasive negative mood, including anxiety, depression, and hostility; believed to be implicated in the experience of symptoms, the seeking of medical treatment, and possibly illness.
AKA: Neuroticism
On a sliding scale
Associated with a wide variety of negative psychological outcomes including depression, anxiety, substance abuse
Has modest heritability
Optimism
Tendency to expect positive outcomes rather than negative outcomes
Psychological control
The perception that one has at one’s disposal a response that will reduce, minimize, eliminate, or offset the adverse effects of an unpleasant event, such as a medical procedure.
Conscientiousness
The propensity to follow socially-prescribed norms for impulse control, to be task- and goal-directed, to be planful, to delay gratification, and to follow norms and rules
Higher levels of conscientiousness were found to be significantly associated with higher physical activity and lower levels of excessive alcohol use, drug use, unhealthy eating, risky driving, risky sex, suicide, tobacco use and violence
4 major coping styles
Approach/Avoidant
Problem focused
Emotion focused
Rumination
Approach Coping Style
Aka confrontative, vigilant
The tendency to cope with stressful events by tackling them directly and attempting to develop solutions; may ultimately be an especially effective method of coping, although it may produce accompanying distress.
Avoidant Coping Style
Aka minimizing
The tendency to cope with threatening events by withdrawing, minimizing, or avoiding them; believed to be an effective short-term, though not an effective long-term, response to stress
Problem-focused coping
Attempts to do something constructive about the stressful situations that are harming, threatening, or challenging an individual.
Beneficial if something can be done about the problem
Emotion-focused coping
Efforts to regulate emotions associated with a stressful encounter; can be associated with distress.
Beneficial if nothing can be done about the problem
Rumination
Tendency to focus on the negative aspect of the stressor, or the negative emotions experienced as a result of the stressor, in a passive and repetitive way
Decidedly not beneficial to health
Holds one in an ongoing state of negative thoughts and emotions and does nothing to help an individual cope with or move past a stressor.
Co-rumination
Sharing negative thoughts and emotions with others who also foster and support those negative thoughts and emotions
Associated with increased symptoms of depression
SES and Coping
Those who perceive themselves as having higher SES cope more effectively and have better health outcomes
Several reasons for this; may have more resources than those with lower SES and have less daily stressors
Successful coping
Successfully addressing tasks in several domains:
1) reduce stressful environmental conditions
2) maximize the chance of recovery, if relevant
3) adjust to or tolerate negative events
4) maintain a positive self-image
5) maintain emotional equilibrium
6) continue satisfying relationships with others
Social support
Information from other people that one is loved and cared for, esteemed and valued, and part of a network of communication and mutual obligation.
Types include: Esteem support, Informational support, Social companionship, Instrumental support
Positive effects on psychological functioning, health behaviors and illness, as well as the ability to cope successfully with stress.
Not measured by number of friends
Esteem support
Other people increase one’s self-esteem
Informational support
Other people are available to offer advice
Social companionship
Support through activities
Instrumental support
Physical help
2 main hypotheses on how social support influences health
Direct/Main Effect Hypothesis
Buffering Hypothesis
Direct/Main Effect Hypothesis
The theory that coping resources, such as social support, have direct beneficial psychological and health effects under conditions of both high stress and low stress
Absence of social support is itself a stressor that can lead to illness
Buffering Hypothesis
The hypothesis that coping resources are useful primarily under conditions of high stress and not necessarily under conditions of low stress.
Described using social comparison theory and role theory
Social comparison theory
Individuals are able to select appropriate coping strategies by comparing themselves to those around them
Role theory
As individuals experience differing stressors, they can change their roles to deal most appropriately with the stressor as friend, CEO, mother, wife and so on.
Having other people in one’s network allows one to select roles as appropriate to meet the demands of the stressor.
Coping interventions
Mindfulness
CBT
Exercise
Mindfulness
Involves the ability to be fully present in the current moment and to pay attention to the thoughts, emotions and sensations one is feeling at any given time.
Calls on individuals to be free of judgment and to accept things as they are in the moment.
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy
Form of psychotherapy that addresses the thoughts and behaviors that lead to negative emotional states such as depression and anxiety.
Exercise
Can be helpful for individuals in terms of putting nervous energy to use, thereby helping to cope with anxiety
Can also be activating for individuals who are suffering from depression, thereby improving mood
Pain
An unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage
Cannot be measured objectively; is subjective
Includes physical and emotional components
Critical feedback system to keep us healthy and safe
Theories of pain
Specificity theory
Pattern theory
Gate-control theory (GCT)
Specificity theory
Individual nociceptors (pain receptors) deliver pain stimuli directly to specific corresponding areas of the brain via pain pathways known as A-delta fibers and C-fibers, thereby triggering the recognized experience of pain and subsequent pain behaviors. Greater the intensity of stimulus, greater the intensity of pain experienced
3 problems with specificity theory
- No evidence supporting notion of specific brain locations for pain
- Pain fibers do not only respond to pain, but to other sensations as well, including temp. and pressure
- Does not seem to be a 1:1 relationship between stimulus intensity and intensity of pain experience (differs across individuals and situations)
Pattern theory
Stimulation of nociceptors in body generate patterns of impulses that are transmitted to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. If patterns exceed a given threshold, info about pain is then transmitted to brain and pain is perceived
Advantage: allows for stimulation of nociceptors without automatic experience of pain (i.e., sub-threshold stimulation) accounting for the lack of pain in the presence of some stimulation.
Problems with pattern theory
- Some people experience pain in absence of stimulation of nociceptors (phantom limb pain)
- Some people don’t experience pain immediately, but after the event